These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20821141)

  • 21. Breast image pre-processing for mammographic tissue segmentation.
    He W; Hogg P; Juette A; Denton ER; Zwiggelaar R
    Comput Biol Med; 2015 Dec; 67():61-73. PubMed ID: 26498046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Computer-aided characterization of mammographic masses: accuracy of mass segmentation and its effects on characterization.
    Sahiner B; Petrick N; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Paramagul C; Helvie MA; Gurcan MN
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1275-84. PubMed ID: 11811827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Automated detection of breast mass spiculation levels and evaluation of scheme performance.
    Jiang L; Song E; Xu X; Ma G; Zheng B
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Dec; 15(12):1534-44. PubMed ID: 19000870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A New Breast Border Extraction and Contrast Enhancement Technique with Digital Mammogram Images for Improved Detection of Breast Cancer.
    Hazarika M; Mahanta LB
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 Aug; 19(8):2141-2148. PubMed ID: 30139217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Mammographic mass segmentation using fuzzy contours.
    Hmida M; Hamrouni K; Solaiman B; Boussetta S
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Oct; 164():131-142. PubMed ID: 30195421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A robust method for segmenting pectoral muscle in mediolateral oblique (MLO) mammograms.
    Yin K; Yan S; Song C; Zheng B
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2019 Feb; 14(2):237-248. PubMed ID: 30288698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A probabilistic approach for breast boundary extraction in mammograms.
    Habibi Aghdam H; Puig D; Solanas A
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2013; 2013():408595. PubMed ID: 24324523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Mass detection in digital breast tomosynthesis: Deep convolutional neural network with transfer learning from mammography.
    Samala RK; Chan HP; Hadjiiski L; Helvie MA; Wei J; Cha K
    Med Phys; 2016 Dec; 43(12):6654. PubMed ID: 27908154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Using computer-extracted image features for modeling of error-making patterns in detection of mammographic masses among radiology residents.
    Zhang J; Lo JY; Kuzmiak CM; Ghate SV; Yoon SC; Mazurowski MA
    Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):091907. PubMed ID: 25186394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Computerized nipple identification for multiple image analysis in computer-aided diagnosis.
    Zhou C; Chan HP; Paramagul C; Roubidoux MA; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Petrick N
    Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2871-82. PubMed ID: 15543797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A new 2D segmentation method based on dynamic programming applied to computer aided detection in mammography.
    Timp S; Karssemeijer N
    Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):958-71. PubMed ID: 15191279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. GPCALMA: implementation in Italian hospitals of a computer aided detection system for breast lesions by mammography examination.
    Lauria A
    Phys Med; 2009 Jun; 25(2):58-72. PubMed ID: 18602854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Multiview-based computer-aided detection scheme for breast masses.
    Zheng B; Leader JK; Abrams GS; Lu AH; Wallace LP; Maitz GS; Gur D
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3135-43. PubMed ID: 17022205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Identification of the breast edge using areas enclosed by iso-intensity contours.
    Padayachee J; Alport MJ; Rae WI
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2007 Sep; 31(6):390-400. PubMed ID: 17398069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A concentric morphology model for the detection of masses in mammography.
    Eltonsy NH; Tourassi GD; Elmaghraby AS
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Jun; 26(6):880-9. PubMed ID: 17679338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Computer-aided classification of mammographic masses using visually sensitive image features.
    Wang Y; Aghaei F; Zarafshani A; Qiu Y; Qian W; Zheng B
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2017; 25(1):171-186. PubMed ID: 27911353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Location of mammograms ROI's and reduction of false-positive.
    Salazar-Licea LA; Pedraza-Ortega JC; Pastrana-Palma A; Aceves-Fernandez MA
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 May; 143():97-111. PubMed ID: 28391823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Parameter optimization of a computer-aided diagnosis system for detection of masses on digitized mammograms.
    Radovic M; Milosevic M; Ninkovic S; Filipovic N; Peulic A
    Technol Health Care; 2015; 23(6):757-74. PubMed ID: 26409521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Computer-aided detection of breast masses on full field digital mammograms.
    Wei J; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Chan HP; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA; Ge J; Zhou C
    Med Phys; 2005 Sep; 32(9):2827-38. PubMed ID: 16266097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Computer-aided diagnosis of mammographic masses using scalable image retrieval.
    Jiang M; Zhang S; Li H; Metaxas DN
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2015 Feb; 62(2):783-92. PubMed ID: 25361497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.