138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20821155)
1. Low-dose CT screening for lung cancer with automatic exposure control: phantom study.
Gomi S; Muramatsu Y; Tsukagoshi S; Suzuki M; Kakinuma R; Tsuchiya R; Moriyama N
Radiol Phys Technol; 2008 Jul; 1(2):244-50. PubMed ID: 20821155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 3D automatic exposure control for 64-detector row CT: radiation dose reduction in chest phantom study.
Matsumoto K; Ohno Y; Koyama H; Kono A; Inokawa H; Onishi Y; Nogami M; Takenaka D; Araki T; Sugimura K
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Mar; 77(3):522-7. PubMed ID: 19836179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automatic exposure control in computed tomography--an evaluation of systems from different manufacturers.
Söderberg M; Gunnarsson M
Acta Radiol; 2010 Jul; 51(6):625-34. PubMed ID: 20429764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automatic exposure control in pediatric and adult computed tomography examinations: can we estimate organ and effective dose from mean MAS reduction?
Papadakis AE; Perisinakis K; Oikonomou I; Damilakis J
Invest Radiol; 2011 Oct; 46(10):654-62. PubMed ID: 21673583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automatic exposure control at MDCT based on the contrast-to-noise ratio: theoretical background and phantom study.
Funama Y; Sugaya Y; Miyazaki O; Utsunomiya D; Yamashita Y; Awai K
Phys Med; 2013 Jan; 29(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 22182517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A routine quality assurance test for CT automatic exposure control systems.
Iball GR; Moore AC; Crawford EJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):291-306. PubMed ID: 27455490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Utilizing a simple CT dosimetry phantom for the comprehension of the operational characteristics of CT AEC systems.
Tsalafoutas IA; Varsamidis A; Thalassinou S; Efstathopoulos EP
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111918. PubMed ID: 24320451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automatic exposure control in multichannel CT with tube current modulation to achieve a constant level of image noise: experimental assessment on pediatric phantoms.
Brisse HJ; Madec L; Gaboriaud G; Lemoine T; Savignoni A; Neuenschwander S; Aubert B; Rosenwald JC
Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 34(7):3018-33. PubMed ID: 17822010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automatic exposure control in pediatric and adult multidetector CT examinations: a phantom study on dose reduction and image quality.
Papadakis AE; Perisinakis K; Damilakis J
Med Phys; 2008 Oct; 35(10):4567-76. PubMed ID: 18975703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of x-ray tube parameters and iodine concentration on image quality and radiation dose in cerebral pediatric and adult CT angiography: a phantom study.
Papadakis AE; Perisinakis K; Raissaki M; Damilakis J
Invest Radiol; 2013 Apr; 48(4):192-9. PubMed ID: 23344518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of organ absorbed doses and estimation of effective doses from pediatric anthropomorphic phantom measurements for multi-detector row CT with and without automatic exposure control.
Brisse HJ; Robilliard M; Savignoni A; Pierrat N; Gaboriaud G; De Rycke Y; Neuenschwander S; Aubert B; Rosenwald JC
Health Phys; 2009 Oct; 97(4):303-14. PubMed ID: 19741359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dose estimation of ultra-low-dose chest CT to different sized adult patients.
Svahn TM; Sjöberg T; Ast JC
Eur Radiol; 2019 Aug; 29(8):4315-4323. PubMed ID: 30560356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CT automated exposure control using a generalized detectability index.
Khobragade P; Rupcich F; Fan J; Crotty DJ; Kulkarni NM; O'Connor SD; Foley WD; Schmidt TG
Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 46(1):140-151. PubMed ID: 30417403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of automatic tube voltage selection on image quality and radiation dose in abdominal CT angiography of various body sizes: a phantom study.
Schindera ST; Winklehner A; Alkadhi H; Goetti R; Fischer M; Gnannt R; Szucs-Farkas Z
Clin Radiol; 2013 Feb; 68(2):e79-86. PubMed ID: 23219454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reduced radiation exposure of the female breast during low-dose chest CT using organ-based tube current modulation and a bismuth shield: comparison of image quality and radiation dose.
Kim YK; Sung YM; Choi JH; Kim EY; Kim HS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Mar; 200(3):537-44. PubMed ID: 23436842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of surface dose and image quality using the half-scan mode in chest computed tomography-guided interventional radiology: a phantom study.
Hasegawa H; Sato J; Kobayashi I
Radiol Phys Technol; 2018 Jun; 11(2):138-148. PubMed ID: 29488072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Size-Specific Dose Estimation In the Korean Lung Cancer Screening Project: Does a 32-cm Diameter Phantom Represent a Standard-Sized Patient in Korean Population?
Kim EY; Kim TJ; Goo JM; Kim HY; Lee JW; Lee S; Lim JT; Kim Y
Korean J Radiol; 2018; 19(6):1179-1186. PubMed ID: 30386149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of contrast material on image noise and radiation dose in adult chest computed tomography using automatic exposure control: a comparative study between 16-, 64- and 128-slice CT.
Paul J; Schell B; Kerl JM; Maentele W; Vogl TJ; Bauer RW
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Aug; 79(2):e128-32. PubMed ID: 21640536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computed tomography automatic exposure control techniques in 18F-FDG oncology PET-CT scanning.
Iball GR; Tout D
Nucl Med Commun; 2014 Apr; 35(4):372-81. PubMed ID: 24445670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Optimization of the chest computed tomography scan by varying the position of the arms].
Matsumoto Y; Masuda T; Imada N; Maruyama N; Inada S; Ishibashi T; Satou T
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2012; 68(7):851-6. PubMed ID: 22821158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
