136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20821170)
1. Dependence of radiographic sensitivity of CR imaging plate on X-ray tube voltage.
Asai Y; Uemura M; Matsumoto M; Kanamori H
Radiol Phys Technol; 2008 Jan; 1(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 20821170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Investigation of beam quality for digital chest radiography with RbBr:Tl(+) photostimulable storage phosphors].
Kawata H
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 Sep; 59(9):1174-82. PubMed ID: 14593331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Image quality and exposure dose in digital projection radiography].
Busch HP; Busch S; Decker C; Schilz C
Rofo; 2003 Jan; 175(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 12525978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Physical evaluation of a needle photostimulable phosphor based CR mammography system.
Marshall NW; Lemmens K; Bosmans H
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):811-24. PubMed ID: 22320791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relative speeds of Kodak computed radiography phosphors and screen-film systems.
Huda W; Rill LN; Bruner AP
Med Phys; 1997 Oct; 24(10):1621-8. PubMed ID: 9350716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Energy and angular dependence of x-ray absorption and its effect on radiographic response in screen--film systems.
Chan HP; Doi K
Phys Med Biol; 1983 May; 28(5):565-79. PubMed ID: 6867113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiation doses and image information in digital pelvimetry with a phosphorous screen.
Holje G; Jarlman O; Samuelsson L
Acta Radiol; 1997 Jan; 38(1):181-4. PubMed ID: 9059425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimisation of image plate radiography with respect to tube voltage.
Tingberg A; Sjöström D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):286-93. PubMed ID: 15933123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [The reduction of the radiation dosage by means of storage phosphor-film radiography compared to a conventional film-screen system with a grid cassette on a skull phantom].
Heyne JP; Merbold H; Sehner J; Neumann R; Freesmeyer M; Jonetz-Mentzel L; Kaiser WA
Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 10464506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Possibilities of dose reduction in lateral cephalometric radiographs and its effects on clinical diagnostics.
Kaeppler G; Dietz K; Reinert S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Jan; 36(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 17329587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Physical imaging properties of a flat panel X-ray detector system].
Yoshida A; Nakamura S; Nishihara S; Kohama C; Takahata A; Fujikawa K
Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(4):246-54. PubMed ID: 12766270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of computed radiography and film/screen combination using a contrast-detail phantom.
Lu ZF; Nickoloff EL; So JC; Dutta AK
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2003; 4(1):91-8. PubMed ID: 12540823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Understanding the relative sensitivity of radiographic screens to scattered radiation.
Yip KL; Whiting BR; Kocher TE; Trauernicht DP; Van Metter RL
Med Phys; 1996 Oct; 23(10):1727-37. PubMed ID: 8946369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Experimental investigations of image quality in X-ray mammography with conventional screen film system (SFS), digital phosphor storage plate in/without magnification technique (CR) and digital CCD-technique (CCD).
Schulz-Wendtland R; Aichinger U; Säbel M; Böhner C; Dobritz M; Wenkel E; Bautz W
Rontgenpraxis; 2001; 54(4):123-6. PubMed ID: 11883115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimal steel thickness combined with computed radiography for portal imaging of nasopharyngeal cancer patients.
Wu S; Jin X; Xie C; Cao G
Med Phys; 2005 Oct; 32(10):3112-6. PubMed ID: 16279063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique.
MacMahon H; Sanada S; Doi K; Giger M; Xu XW; Yin FF; Montner SM; Carlin M
Radiographics; 1991 Mar; 11(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 2028063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating radiographic parameters for mobile chest computed radiography: phantoms, image quality and effective dose.
Rill LN; Brateman L; Arreola M
Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2727-35. PubMed ID: 14596311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Simultaneous multilayer arthrotomography of the temporomandibular joint using photostimulable phosphor computed radiography.
Honda E; Ohbayashi N; Sasaki T; Kino K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Sep; 26(5):304-11. PubMed ID: 9482004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. AEC set-up optimisation with computed radiography imaging.
Mazzocchi S; Belli G; Busoni S; Gori C; Menchi I; Salucci P; Taddeucci A; Zatelli G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):169-73. PubMed ID: 16461503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Unsharp masking of low-dosed digital luminescence radiographs: results of a receiver operating characteristics analysis.
Müller RD; Voss M; Hirche H; Buddenbrock B; John V; Bosch E
Eur Radiol; 1996; 6(4):526-31. PubMed ID: 8798037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
