These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20821438)

  • 1. Toward a unified approach to dose-response modeling in ecotoxicology.
    Ritz C
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2010 Jan; 29(1):220-9. PubMed ID: 20821438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Bayesian approach for determining the no effect concentration and hazardous concentration in ecotoxicology.
    Fox DR
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2010 Feb; 73(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 19836077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. MOSAIC: a web-interface for statistical analyses in ecotoxicology.
    Charles S; Veber P; Delignette-Muller ML
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Apr; 25(12):11295-11302. PubMed ID: 28842838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Moving Beyond p < 0.05 in Ecotoxicology: A Guide for Practitioners.
    Erickson RA; Rattner BA
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2020 Sep; 39(9):1657-1669. PubMed ID: 32539165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. General unified threshold model of survival--a toxicokinetic-toxicodynamic framework for ecotoxicology.
    Jager T; Albert C; Preuss TG; Ashauer R
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Apr; 45(7):2529-40. PubMed ID: 21366215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The benchmark dose method--review of available models, and recommendations for application in health risk assessment.
    Filipsson AF; Sand S; Nilsson J; Victorin K
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2003; 33(5):505-42. PubMed ID: 14594105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. NOEC and LOEC as merely concessive expedients: two unambiguous alternatives and some criteria to maximize the efficiency of dose-response experimental designs.
    Murado MA; Prieto MA
    Sci Total Environ; 2013 Sep; 461-462():576-86. PubMed ID: 23756217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Model-based dose finding under model uncertainty using general parametric models.
    Pinheiro J; Bornkamp B; Glimm E; Bretz F
    Stat Med; 2014 May; 33(10):1646-61. PubMed ID: 24302486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistical failure models for water distribution pipes - A review from a unified perspective.
    Scheidegger A; Leitão JP; Scholten L
    Water Res; 2015 Oct; 83():237-47. PubMed ID: 26162313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mathematical modeling of drug release profiles for modified hydrophobic HPMC based gels.
    Ghosal K; Chandra A; Rajabalaya R; Chakraborty S; Nanda A
    Pharmazie; 2012 Feb; 67(2):147-55. PubMed ID: 22512085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Individual versus population effects in concentration-response modeling.
    Fox DR; Billoir E
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2011 Jul; 7(3):501-2. PubMed ID: 21692173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Statistical cautions when estimating DEBtox parameters.
    Billoir E; Delignette-Muller ML; Péry AR; Geffard O; Charles S
    J Theor Biol; 2008 Sep; 254(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 18571678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using sparse dose-response data for wildlife risk assessment.
    Hill RA; Pyper BJ; Lawrence GS; Mann GS; Allard P; Mackintosh CE; Healey N; Dwyer J; Trowell J
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2014 Jan; 10(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 23913468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimal designs for the individual and joint exposure general logistic regression models.
    Antonello JM; Raghavarao D
    J Biopharm Stat; 2000 Aug; 10(3):351-67. PubMed ID: 10959916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modeling dose-response functions for combination treatments with log-logistic or Weibull functions.
    Holland-Letz T; Leibner A; Kopp-Schneider A
    Arch Toxicol; 2020 Jan; 94(1):197-204. PubMed ID: 31786636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistical analysis of combined dose effects for experiments with two agents.
    Wagenpfeil S; Treiber U; Lehmer A
    Artif Intell Med; 2006 May; 37(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 16497492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.
    Paciorek CJ; Liu Y;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Local polynomial regression modeling of human plasma melatonin levels.
    Gamst A; Wolfson T; Parry B
    J Biol Rhythms; 2004 Apr; 19(2):164-74. PubMed ID: 15038856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Time to get off the fence: the need for definitive international guidance on statistical analysis of ecotoxicity data.
    van Dam RA; Harford AJ; Warne MS
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2012 Apr; 8(2):242-5. PubMed ID: 22308052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Combining multiple comparisons and modeling techniques in dose-response studies.
    Bretz F; Pinheiro JC; Branson M
    Biometrics; 2005 Sep; 61(3):738-48. PubMed ID: 16135025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.