BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20821699)

  • 1. Summing nondetects: incorporating low-level contaminants in risk assessment.
    Helsel DR
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2010 Jul; 6(3):361-6. PubMed ID: 20821699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fabricating data: how substituting values for nondetects can ruin results, and what can be done about it.
    Helsel DR
    Chemosphere; 2006 Dec; 65(11):2434-9. PubMed ID: 16737727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of method detection limits in environmental measurements.
    Adams NH
    Qual Assur; 1997; 5(4):257-64. PubMed ID: 9670240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Much ado about next to nothing: incorporating nondetects in science.
    Helsel D
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Apr; 54(3):257-62. PubMed ID: 20032004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the application of loss functions in determining assessment factors for ecological risk.
    Hickey GL; Craig PS; Hart A
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2009 Feb; 72(2):293-300. PubMed ID: 18691758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Toxicity profiling: An integrated effect-based tool for site-specific sediment quality assessment.
    Hamers T; Leonards PE; Legler J; Vethaak AD; Schipper CA
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2010 Oct; 6(4):761-73. PubMed ID: 20872654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Chemicals of emerging concern in the Great Lakes Basin: an analysis of environmental exposures.
    Klecka G; Persoon C; Currie R
    Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2010; 207():1-93. PubMed ID: 20652664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantification of variability and uncertainty for censored data sets and application to air toxic emission factors.
    Zhao Y; Frey HC
    Risk Anal; 2004 Aug; 24(4):1019-34. PubMed ID: 15357825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Potential application of ecological models in the European environmental risk assessment of chemicals. I. Review of protection goals in EU directives and regulations.
    Hommen U; Baveco JM; Galic N; van den Brink PJ
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2010 Jul; 6(3):325-37. PubMed ID: 20821697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dioxin and furan levels found in tampons.
    Archer JC; Mabry-Smith R; Shojaee S; Threet J; Eckert JJ; Litman VE
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2005 May; 14(4):311-5. PubMed ID: 15916504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving emissions estimates of home and personal care products ingredients for use in EU risk assessments.
    Price OR; Hughes GO; Roche NL; Mason PJ
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2010 Oct; 6(4):677-84. PubMed ID: 20872648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ecological risk of anthropogenic pollutants to reptiles: Evaluating assumptions of sensitivity and exposure.
    Weir SM; Suski JG; Salice CJ
    Environ Pollut; 2010 Dec; 158(12):3596-606. PubMed ID: 20855139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bioconcentration, bioaccumulation, and metabolism of pesticides in aquatic organisms.
    Katagi T
    Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2010; 204():1-132. PubMed ID: 19957234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Potential application of population models in the European ecological risk assessment of chemicals. II. Review of models and their potential to address environmental protection aims.
    Galic N; Hommen U; Baveco JM; van den Brink PJ
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2010 Jul; 6(3):338-60. PubMed ID: 20821698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Methods for deriving pesticide aquatic life criteria.
    TenBrook PL; Tjeerdema RS; Hann P; Karkoski J
    Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2009; 199():19-109. PubMed ID: 19110939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of observations below detection limit for model calibration.
    LeFrancois M; Poeter E
    Ground Water; 2009; 47(2):228-36. PubMed ID: 19016900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of techniques for assessing central tendency in left-censored data using PCB and p,p'DDE contaminant concentrations from Michigan's Bald Eagle Biosentinel Program.
    Leith KF; Bowerman WW; Wierda MR; Best DA; Grubb TG; Sikarske JG
    Chemosphere; 2010 Jun; 80(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 20416924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ecotoxicity and chemical sediment data classification by the use of self-organising maps.
    Tsakovski S; Kudlak B; Simeonov V; Wolska L; Namiesnik J
    Anal Chim Acta; 2009 Jan; 631(2):142-52. PubMed ID: 19084619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effectiveness of various exposure metrics in defining dose-response relationships for mink (Mustela vison) exposed to polychlorinated biphenyls.
    Fuchsman PC; Barber TR; Bock MJ
    Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 2008 Jan; 54(1):130-44. PubMed ID: 17943339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.