252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20821930)
1. Less iodine injected for the same diagnostic performances: comparison of two low-osmolar contrast agents (iobitridol 350 and iopamidol 370) in coronary angiography and ventriculography: a randomized double-blind clinical study.
Velázquez MT; Albarrán A; Hernández F; García Tejada J; Zueco J; Andreu J; De la Torre JM; Figueroa A; Sainz F; Tascón J
Acta Cardiol; 2010 Aug; 65(4):387-94. PubMed ID: 20821930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical tolerance and diagnostic efficacy of iobitridol 300 in lower limb angiography.
Stockx L; Wilms G; Baert AL; Terrier F
Acta Radiol Suppl; 1996; 400():72-4. PubMed ID: 8619357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of iopromide with iohexol and iopamidol in coronary arteriography and left ventriculography.
Bergelson B; Bettmann MA; Wexler L; Wilson R; Dyet J
Invest Radiol; 1994 May; 29 Suppl 1():S107-11; discussion S118-9. PubMed ID: 8071037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative assessment of image quality for coronary CT angiography with iobitridol and two contrast agents with higher iodine concentrations: iopromide and iomeprol. A multicentre randomized double-blind trial.
Achenbach S; Paul JF; Laurent F; Becker HC; Rengo M; Caudron J; Leschka S; Vignaux O; Knobloch G; Benea G; Schlosser T; Andreu J; Cabeza B; Jacquier A; Souto M; Revel D; Qanadli SD; Cademartiri F;
Eur Radiol; 2017 Feb; 27(2):821-830. PubMed ID: 27271922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A prospective, randomized trial to determine the early and late reactions after the use of iopamidol 340 (Niopam) and iobitridol 350 (Xenetix) in cardiac catheterization.
Vijayalakshmi K; Williams D; Wright RA; Hall JA; Harcombe AA; Linker NJ; Stewart MJ; Davies A; de Belder MA
J Invasive Cardiol; 2004 Dec; 16(12):707-11. PubMed ID: 15596875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of iopromide and iopamidol in left ventricular angiography and in coronary angiography.
Dyet JF; Carter EC; Hartley WC
Br J Radiol; 1990 Sep; 63(753):700-5. PubMed ID: 2205329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of a low-osmolar contrast medium, iopamidol, and an iso-osmolar contrast medium, iodixanol, in MDCT coronary angiography.
Ozbulbul NI; Yurdakul M; Tola M
Coron Artery Dis; 2010 Nov; 21(7):414-9. PubMed ID: 20671550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of iopromide with iopamidol and iohexol for contrast-enhanced computed tomography.
Goldberg SN; Abrahams J; Drayer BP; Golding S; Bernardino M; Brunetti J
Invest Radiol; 1994 May; 29 Suppl 1():S76-83; discussion S93. PubMed ID: 8071050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Safety and efficacy of the new iodinated nonionic low-osmolality contrast medium Iobitridol (Xenetix) in coronary and ventricular angiography.
Lefevre T; Funck F; Aliot E; Ethevenot B
Acta Radiol Suppl; 1996; 400():75-80. PubMed ID: 8619358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In response to: K. Vijayalakshmi, et al, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 707-711: A prospective, randomized trial to determine the early and late reactions after the use of iopamidol 340 (Niopam) and iobitridol 350 (Xenetix) in cardiac catheterization.
Pinès E; Zamia P; Idée JM
J Invasive Cardiol; 2005 Feb; 17(2):123-4. PubMed ID: 15770762
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A double-blind study of iopromide 300 for peripheral arteriography. Results of a multi-institutional comparison of iopromide with iohexol and iopamidol.
Druy EM; Bettmann MA; Jeans W
Invest Radiol; 1994 May; 29 Suppl 1():S102-5; discussion S106. PubMed ID: 8071036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In response to: K. Vijayalakshmi, et al, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 707-711: A prospective, randomized trial to determine the early and late reactions after the use of iopamidol 340 (Niopam) and iobitridol 350 (Xenetix) in cardiac catheterization.
Gayet JL; Lefevre T
J Invasive Cardiol; 2005 Feb; 17(2):124. PubMed ID: 15770763
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical tolerance and diagnostic efficacy of iobitridol in contrast-enhanced CT in children.
Smets A; Shaw D
Acta Radiol Suppl; 1996; 400():65-7. PubMed ID: 8619355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Incidence of ventricular fibrillation during left coronary arteriography in pigs: comparison of a solution of the nonionic dimer iodixanol with solutions of five different nonionic monomers.
Chai CM; Karlsson JO; Almén T
Acta Radiol; 2008 Mar; 49(2):150-6. PubMed ID: 18300138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of viscosity and iodine concentration of nonionic radiographic contrast media on coronary arteriography in patients.
Kern MJ; Roth RA; Aguirre FV; Beauman G; Vogel R
Am Heart J; 1992 Jan; 123(1):160-5. PubMed ID: 1729820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of non-ionic iodinated contrast media on patient heart rate and pressures during intra-cardiac or intra-arterial injection.
Schmid I; Didier D; Pfammatter T; Garachemani A; Fleisch M; Kirchin MA; Meier B
Int J Cardiol; 2007 Jun; 118(3):389-96. PubMed ID: 17376548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of reduced x-ray tube voltage, low iodine concentration contrast medium, and sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction on image quality and radiation dose at coronary CT angiography: results of the prospective multicenter REALISE trial.
Yin WH; Lu B; Gao JB; Li PL; Sun K; Wu ZF; Yang WJ; Zhang XQ; Zheng MW; McQuiston AD; Meinel FG; Schoepf UJ
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2015; 9(3):215-24. PubMed ID: 25843243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Double-blind study of the safety, tolerance, and diagnostic efficacy of iopromide as compared with iopamidol and iohexol in patients requiring aortography and visceral angiography.
Faykus MH; Cope C; Athanasoulis C; Druy EM; Hedgcock M; Miller FJ; Bron K
Invest Radiol; 1994 May; 29 Suppl 1():S98-101; discussion S106. PubMed ID: 8071053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 64-Slice CT angiography of the abdominal aorta and abdominal arteries: comparison of the diagnostic efficacy of iobitridol 350 mgI/ml versus iomeprol 400 mgI/ml in a prospective, randomised, double-blind multi-centre trial.
Loewe C; Becker CR; Berletti R; Cametti CA; Caudron J; Coudyzer W; De Mey J; Favat M; Heautot JF; Heye S; Hittinger M; Larralde A; Lestrat JP; Marangoni R; Nieboer K; Reimer P; Schwarz M; Schernthaner M; Lammer J
Eur Radiol; 2010 Mar; 20(3):572-83. PubMed ID: 19789884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Randomized, Double-Blind Study Comparing Patient Comfort and Safety Between Iodixanol 320 mg I/mL and Iopamidol 370 mg I/mL in Patients Undergoing Peripheral Arteriography - The COMFORT II Trial.
Rosenberg C; Martínez-Rodrigo JJ; Lonjedo Vicent E; Macho J; Lim L; Todoran TM;
J Invasive Cardiol; 2017 Jan; 29(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 28045670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
