These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

424 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20822210)

  • 21. A common coding framework in self-other interaction: evidence from joint action task.
    Tsai CC; Kuo WJ; Jing JT; Hung DL; Tzeng OJ
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Nov; 175(2):353-62. PubMed ID: 16799815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Influence of action-effect associations acquired by ideomotor learning on imitation.
    Bunlon F; Marshall PJ; Quandt LC; Bouquet CA
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0121617. PubMed ID: 25793755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Influence of verbal instructions on effect-based action control.
    Eder AB; Dignath D
    Psychol Res; 2017 Mar; 81(2):355-365. PubMed ID: 26847335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Non-action effect binding: A critical re-assessment.
    Weller L; Kunde W; Pfister R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Oct; 180():137-146. PubMed ID: 28942126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Ideomotor learning: Time to generalize a longstanding principle.
    Moeller B; Pfister R
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2022 Sep; 140():104782. PubMed ID: 35878792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of stimulus-response compatibility in mediating expert performance in baseball players.
    Nakamoto H; Mori S
    Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 1189():179-88. PubMed ID: 18048011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Expression of nonconscious knowledge via ideomotor actions.
    Gauchou HL; Rensink RA; Fels S
    Conscious Cogn; 2012 Jun; 21(2):976-82. PubMed ID: 22377138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Transfer of learning in choice reactions: contributions of specific and general components of manual responses.
    Yamaguchi M; Proctor RW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jan; 130(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 18952202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The influence of response--effect compatibility in a serial reaction time task.
    Stöcker C; Sebald A; Hoffmann J
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 May; 56(4):685-703. PubMed ID: 12745836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The functional and neural mechanism of action preparation: roles of EBA and FFA in voluntary action control.
    Kühn S; Keizer A; Rombouts SA; Hommel B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Jan; 23(1):214-20. PubMed ID: 20044885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Equivalency of reaction times for simple and primed tasks.
    Hart MA; Reeve TG
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Jul; 125(3):291-300. PubMed ID: 17055991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Impaired imitation of meaningless gestures in ideomotor apraxia: a conceptual problem not a disorder of action control? A single case investigation.
    Sunderland A
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Apr; 45(8):1621-31. PubMed ID: 17306847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. From anticipation to integration: the role of integrated action-effects in building sensorimotor contingencies.
    Camus T; Hommel B; Brunel L; Brouillet T
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Jun; 25(3):1059-1065. PubMed ID: 28537007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Sensory-based mechanism for delayed motor intention.
    Badets A; Albinet CT; Blandin Y
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Oct; 141(2):205-13. PubMed ID: 22968194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Methodological issues in measures of imitative reaction times.
    Aicken MD; Wilson AD; Williams JH; Mon-Williams M
    Brain Cogn; 2007 Apr; 63(3):304-8. PubMed ID: 17070640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Twin peaks: an ERP study of action planning and control in co-acting individuals.
    Sebanz N; Knoblich G; Prinz W; Wascher E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 May; 18(5):859-70. PubMed ID: 16768383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Are spatial responses to visuospatial stimuli and spoken responses to auditory letters ideomotor-compatible tasks? Examination of set-size effects on dual-task interference.
    Shin YK; Proctor RW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Nov; 129(3):352-64. PubMed ID: 18845280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The impact of subliminal effect images in voluntary vs. stimulus-driven actions.
    Le Bars S; Hsu YF; Waszak F
    Cognition; 2016 Nov; 156():6-15. PubMed ID: 27467892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Action-effect negativity: irrelevant action effects are monitored like relevant feedback.
    Band GP; van Steenbergen H; Ridderinkhof KR; Falkenstein M; Hommel B
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Dec; 82(3):211-8. PubMed ID: 19665516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Visuomotor and motorvisual priming with different types of set-level congruency: evidence in support of ideomotor theory, and the planning and control model (PCM).
    Thomaschke R; Miall RC; Rueß M; Mehta PR; Hopkins B
    Psychol Res; 2018 Nov; 82(6):1073-1090. PubMed ID: 28756514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.