These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20822251)

  • 1. The importance of covariate selection in controlling for selection bias in observational studies.
    Steiner PM; Cook TD; Shadish WR; Clark MH
    Psychol Methods; 2010 Sep; 15(3):250-67. PubMed ID: 20822251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Case matching and the reduction of selection bias in quasi-experiments: The relative importance of pretest measures of outcome, of unreliable measurement, and of mode of data analysis.
    Cook TD; Steiner PM
    Psychol Methods; 2010 Mar; 15(1):56-68. PubMed ID: 20230103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Addressing the issue of channeling bias in observational studies with propensity scores analysis.
    Lobo FS; Wagner S; Gross CR; Schommer JC
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2006 Mar; 2(1):143-51. PubMed ID: 17138506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Propensity score methods and their application in nephrology research.
    Barnieh L; James MT; Zhang J; Hemmelgarn BR
    J Nephrol; 2011; 24(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 21404223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Propensity score methods for creating covariate balance in observational studies].
    Pattanayak CW; Rubin DB; Zell ER
    Rev Esp Cardiol; 2011 Oct; 64(10):897-903. PubMed ID: 21872981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Marginal mean weighting through stratification: a generalized method for evaluating multivalued and multiple treatments with nonexperimental data.
    Hong G
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Mar; 17(1):44-60. PubMed ID: 21843003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Propensity score estimation with missing values using a multiple imputation missingness pattern (MIMP) approach.
    Qu Y; Lipkovich I
    Stat Med; 2009 Apr; 28(9):1402-14. PubMed ID: 19222021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(12):2037-49. PubMed ID: 18038446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing longitudinal binary outcomes in an observational oral health study.
    Shelton BJ; Gilbert GH; Lu Z; Bradshaw P; Chavers LS; Howard G
    Stat Med; 2003 Jun; 22(12):2057-70. PubMed ID: 12802822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Advanced statistics: the propensity score--a method for estimating treatment effect in observational research.
    Newgard CD; Hedges JR; Arthur M; Mullins RJ
    Acad Emerg Med; 2004 Sep; 11(9):953-61. PubMed ID: 15347546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The reverse propensity score to detect selection bias and correct for baseline imbalances.
    Berger VW
    Stat Med; 2005 Sep; 24(18):2777-87. PubMed ID: 15981305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A simple, flexible, and effective covariate-adaptive treatment allocation procedure.
    Loux TM
    Stat Med; 2013 Sep; 32(22):3775-87. PubMed ID: 23637002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Controlling bias in complex nursing intervention studies: a checklist.
    Campbell-Yeo M; Ranger M; Johnston C; Fergusson D
    Can J Nurs Res; 2009 Dec; 41(4):32-50. PubMed ID: 20191712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Extended follow-up and spatial analysis of the American Cancer Society study linking particulate air pollution and mortality.
    Krewski D; Jerrett M; Burnett RT; Ma R; Hughes E; Shi Y; Turner MC; Pope CA; Thurston G; Calle EE; Thun MJ; Beckerman B; DeLuca P; Finkelstein N; Ito K; Moore DK; Newbold KB; Ramsay T; Ross Z; Shin H; Tempalski B
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 May; (140):5-114; discussion 115-36. PubMed ID: 19627030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimating the proportion of studies missing for meta-analysis due to publication bias.
    Formann AK
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Sep; 29(5):732-9. PubMed ID: 18586577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bias due to aggregation of individual covariates in the Cox regression model.
    Abrahamowicz M; Du Berger R; Krewski D; Burnett R; Bartlett G; Tamblyn RM; Leffondré K
    Am J Epidemiol; 2004 Oct; 160(7):696-706. PubMed ID: 15383414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Selection criteria and generalizability within the counterfactual framework: explaining the paradox of antidepressant-induced suicidality?
    Weisberg HI; Hayden VC; Pontes VP
    Clin Trials; 2009 Apr; 6(2):109-18. PubMed ID: 19342462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bias reduction with an adjustment for participants' intent to dropout of a randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Leon AC; Demirtas H; Hedeker D
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(5):540-7. PubMed ID: 17942469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Propensity Score-Based Estimators With Multiple Error-Prone Covariates.
    Hong H; Aaby DA; Siddique J; Stuart EA
    Am J Epidemiol; 2019 Jan; 188(1):222-230. PubMed ID: 30358801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparison of selected causality theories].
    Thoemmes F
    Gesundheitswesen; 2011 Dec; 73(12):880-3. PubMed ID: 22193896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.