134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20822263)
1. Development and validation of culture-specific Variable Response Inconsistency and True Response Inconsistency scales for use with the Korean MMPI-2.
Ketterer HL; Han K; Hur J; Moon K
Psychol Assess; 2010 Sep; 22(3):504-19. PubMed ID: 20822263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Psychometric functioning of the MMPI-2-RF VRIN-r and TRIN-r scales with varying degrees of randomness, acquiescence, and counter-acquiescence.
Handel RW; Ben-Porath YS; Tellegen A; Archer RP
Psychol Assess; 2010 Mar; 22(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 20230155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An evaluation of the MMPI-2 and MMPI-a true response inconsistency (TRIN) scales.
Handel RW; Arnau RC; Archer RP; Dandy KL
Assessment; 2006 Mar; 13(1):98-106. PubMed ID: 16443721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Psychometric Examination, Adaptation, and Evaluation of the Hebrew Translation of the MMPI-2-RF VRIN-r and TRIN-r Validity Scales.
Shkalim E; Ben-Porath YS; Handel RW; Almagor M; Tellegen A
J Pers Assess; 2016; 98(6):608-15. PubMed ID: 27219330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The MMPI-2 in Perú: a normative study.
Scott RL; Pampa WM
J Pers Assess; 2000 Feb; 74(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 10779935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Gender differences on the MMPI across American and Korean adult and adolescent normative samples.
Han K; Park HI; Weed NC; Lim J; Johnson A; Joles C
J Pers Assess; 2013; 95(2):197-206. PubMed ID: 23410238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detecting random, partially random, and nonrandom Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 protocols.
Pinsoneault TB
Psychol Assess; 2007 Mar; 19(1):159-64. PubMed ID: 17371131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detecting random, partially random, and nonrandom Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-Adolescent protocols.
Pinsoneault TB
Psychol Assess; 2005 Dec; 17(4):476-80. PubMed ID: 16393014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analyzing psychopathology items: a case for nonparametric item response theory modeling.
Meijer RR; Baneke JJ
Psychol Methods; 2004 Sep; 9(3):354-68. PubMed ID: 15355153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effectiveness of MMPI-A items in discriminating between normative and clinical samples.
Archer RP; Handel RW; Lynch KD
J Pers Assess; 2001 Dec; 77(3):420-35. PubMed ID: 11781030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Variable Response Inconsistency scale and a True Response Inconsistency scale for the Millon Adolescent Clinical Inventory.
Pinsoneault TB
Psychol Assess; 2002 Sep; 14(3):320-30. PubMed ID: 12214438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. "False feigners": Examining the impact of non-content-based invalid responding on the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form content-based invalid responding indicators.
Burchett D; Dragon WR; Smith Holbert AM; Tarescavage AM; Mattson CA; Handel RW; Ben-Porath YS
Psychol Assess; 2016 May; 28(5):458-70. PubMed ID: 26302101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparability of scores on the MMPI-2-RF scales generated with the MMPI-2 and MMPI-2-RF booklets.
Van der Heijden PT; Egger JI; Derksen JJ
J Pers Assess; 2010 May; 92(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 20408025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Syndromal complexity, paradigm shifts, and the future of validation research: comments on Nichols and Rogers, Sewell, Harrison, and Jordan.
Weed NC
J Pers Assess; 2006 Oct; 87(2):217-22. PubMed ID: 16972826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validity of the substance abuse scales of the MMPI-2 in a college student sample.
Svanum S; McGrew J; Ehrmann L
J Pers Assess; 1994 Jun; 62(3):427-39. PubMed ID: 8027909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MMPI-A validity scale uses and limitations in detecting varying levels of random responding.
Archer RP; Handel RW; Lynch KD; Elkins DE
J Pers Assess; 2002 Jun; 78(3):417-31. PubMed ID: 12146812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) scores generated from the MMPI-2 and MMPI-2-RF test booklets: internal structure comparability in a sample of criminal defendants.
Tarescavage AM; Alosco ML; Ben-Porath YS; Wood A; Luna-Jones L
Assessment; 2015 Apr; 22(2):188-97. PubMed ID: 24934218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The MMPI-2 Restructured Clinical (RC) Scales and restraints to innovation, or "what have they done to my song?".
Finn SE; Kamphuis JH
J Pers Assess; 2006 Oct; 87(2):202-10. PubMed ID: 16972824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effective cutoffs for detecting random, partially random, and nonrandom 370-item MMPI-2 short form protocols.
Pinsoneault TB
J Pers Assess; 2011 Jan; 93(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 21184329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The MMPI-2 Clinical Scales and Restructured Clinical (RC) Scales: comparative psychometric properties and relative diagnostic efficiency in young adults.
Osberg TM; Haseley EN; Kamas MM
J Pers Assess; 2008 Jan; 90(1):81-92. PubMed ID: 18444099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
