236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20822285)
1. Adjudicative competence: evidence that impairment in "rational understanding" is taxonic.
Marcus DK; Poythress NG; Edens JF; Lilienfeld SO
Psychol Assess; 2010 Sep; 22(3):716-22. PubMed ID: 20822285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. AAPL Practice Guideline for the forensic psychiatric evaluation of competence to stand trial.
Mossman D; Noffsinger SG; Ash P; Frierson RL; Gerbasi J; Hackett M; Lewis CF; Pinals DA; Scott CL; Sieg KG; Wall BW; Zonana HV;
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(4 Suppl):S3-72. PubMed ID: 18083992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing dimensions of competency to stand trial: construct validation of the ECST-R.
Rogers R; Jackson RL; Sewell KW; Tillbrook CE; Martin MA
Assessment; 2003 Dec; 10(4):344-51. PubMed ID: 14682480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Opinion formation in evaluating the adjudicative competence and restorability of criminal defendants: a review of 8,000 evaluations.
Warren JI; Murrie DC; Stejskal W; Colwell LH; Morris J; Chauhan P; Dietz P
Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(2):113-32. PubMed ID: 16557643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantifying the accuracy of forensic examiners in the absence of a "gold standard".
Mossman D; Bowen MD; Vanness DJ; Bienenfeld D; Correll T; Kay J; Klykylo WM; Lehrer DS
Law Hum Behav; 2010 Oct; 34(5):402-17. PubMed ID: 19771499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Competence to stand trial should require rational understanding.
Felthous AR
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2011; 39(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 21389162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. AAPL Practice Guideline for the Forensic Psychiatric Evaluation of Competence to Stand Trial: an American legal perspective.
Fitch WL
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(4):509-13. PubMed ID: 18086744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Competency to stand trial adjudication: a comparison of female and male defendants.
Riley SE
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1998; 26(2):223-40. PubMed ID: 9664258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Capacity of forensic patients to consent to research: the use of the MacCAT-CR.
McDermott BE; Gerbasi JB; Quanbeck C; Scott CL
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(3):299-307. PubMed ID: 16186191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Competence to stand trial: clinician reliability and the role of offense severity.
Rosenfeld B; Ritchie K
J Forensic Sci; 1998 Jan; 43(1):151-7. PubMed ID: 9456535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Competence to proceed: a functional and context-determinative decision.
Bennett GT; Sullwold AF
J Forensic Sci; 1984 Oct; 29(4):1119-26. PubMed ID: 6502111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correlates of adjudicative competence among psychiatrically impaired juveniles.
Warren JI; Aaron J; Ryan E; Chauhan P; DuVal J
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(3):299-309. PubMed ID: 14584528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factor structure and validity of the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool-Criminal Adjudication.
Zapf PA; Skeem JL; Golding SL
Psychol Assess; 2005 Dec; 17(4):433-45. PubMed ID: 16393010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Linguistic diversity in deaf defendants and due process rights.
Miller KR; Vernon M
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2001; 6(3):226-34. PubMed ID: 15451852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Juvenile offenders: competence to stand trial.
Soulier M
Psychiatr Clin North Am; 2012 Dec; 35(4):837-54. PubMed ID: 23107566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating competency to stand trial with evidence-based practice.
Rogers R; Johansson-Love J
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(4):450-60. PubMed ID: 20018994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Defendant's or convict's competency to stand trial - forensic psychiatric evaluation.
Cynkier PN
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2017; 67(3):214-225. PubMed ID: 29460611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Commentary: A road map for research in restoration of competency to stand trial.
Scott CL
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 12817841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The MacArthur Adjudicative Competence Study: diagnosis, psychopathology, and competence-related abilities.
Hoge SK; Poythress N; Bonnie RJ; Monahan J; Eisenberg M; Feucht-Haviar T
Behav Sci Law; 1997; 15(3):329-45. PubMed ID: 9415960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing competency competently: toward a rational standard for competency-to-stand-trial assessments.
Morris GH; Haroun AM; Naimark D
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(3):231-45. PubMed ID: 15515910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
