195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20822971)
1. A comparative study of allergic contact dermatitis by patch test versus reflectance confocal laser microscopy, with nickel and cobalt.
Sakanashi EN; Matsumura M; Kikuchi K; Ikeda M; Miura H
Eur J Dermatol; 2010; 20(6):705-11. PubMed ID: 20822971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contact allergy in children referred for patch testing: North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 2001-2004.
Zug KA; McGinley-Smith D; Warshaw EM; Taylor JS; Rietschel RL; Maibach HI; Belsito DV; Fowler JF; Storrs FJ; DeLeo VA; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Sasseville D
Arch Dermatol; 2008 Oct; 144(10):1329-36. PubMed ID: 18936397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patch test results with metals and meteorological conditions.
Hegewald J; Uter W; Kranke B; Schnuch A; Gefeller O; Pfahlberg A
Int Arch Allergy Immunol; 2008; 147(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 18594154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Simultaneous sodium lauryl sulphate testing improves the diagnostic validity of allergic patch tests. Results from a prospective multicentre study of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG).
Löffler H; Becker D; Brasch J; Geier J;
Br J Dermatol; 2005 Apr; 152(4):709-19. PubMed ID: 15840103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Result of standard patch test in patients suspected of having allergic contact dermatitis.
Wongpiyabovorn J; Puvabanditsin P
J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Sep; 88 Suppl 4():S177-83. PubMed ID: 16623025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patch test reactions to metal salts in patients with different types of dermatitis.
Turčić P; Marinović Kulišić S; Lipozenčić J
Acta Dermatovenerol Croat; 2013; 21(3):180-4. PubMed ID: 24183222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reflectance confocal microscopy may differentiate acute allergic and irritant contact dermatitis in vivo.
Swindells K; Burnett N; Rius-Diaz F; González E; Mihm MC; González S
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2004 Feb; 50(2):220-8. PubMed ID: 14726876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cross-reactivity between nickel and palladium demonstrated by systemic administration of nickel.
Hindsén M; Spirén A; Bruze M
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Jul; 53(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 15982224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Path test reactions to the Chinese Standard Screening Allergens in 1,135 patients investigated for allergic contact dermatitis.
Liu YQ; Zhao B; Zhuang LH; Fan WX
Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Sep; 8(3):141-3. PubMed ID: 9249281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Allergic contact dermatitis in Iran.
Kashani MN; Gorouhi F; Behnia F; Nazemi MJ; Dowlati Y; Firooz A
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Mar; 52(3):154-8. PubMed ID: 15811031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contact allergy to colophony. Clinical and experimental studies with emphasis on clinical relevance.
Färm G
Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh); 1998; 201():1-42. PubMed ID: 9833065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of allergic vesicular reaction to patch test using in vivo confocal microscopy.
Ardigò M; Longo C; Cristaudo A; Berardesca E; Pellacani G
Skin Res Technol; 2012 Feb; 18(1):61-3. PubMed ID: 21443755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Allergic contact dermatitis: patch testing results at Mount Sinai Medical Center.
Yoo JY; Al Naami M; Markowitz O; Hadi SM
Skinmed; 2010; 8(5):257-60. PubMed ID: 21137633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Late reactions to the patch-test preparations para-phenylenediamine and epoxy resin: a prospective multicentre investigation of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group.
Hillen U; Jappe U; Frosch PJ; Becker D; Brasch J; Lilie M; Fuchs T; Kreft B; Pirker C; Geier J;
Br J Dermatol; 2006 Apr; 154(4):665-70. PubMed ID: 16536809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Differential epidermal expression of the invariant chain in allergic and irritant contact dermatitis.
Emilson A; Lindberg M; Scheynius A
Acta Derm Venereol; 1998 Nov; 78(6):402-7. PubMed ID: 9833035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Nickel, chromium and cobalt sensitization in a patch test population in north-eastern Italy (1996-2010).
Rui F; Bovenzi M; Prodi A; Belloni Fortina A; Romano I; Corradin MT; Larese Filon F
Contact Dermatitis; 2013 Jan; 68(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 22748282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reproducibility of patch test results: a concurrent right-versus-left study using TRUE Test.
Ale SI; Maibach HI
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 May; 50(5):304-12. PubMed ID: 15209812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patch testing reactions to a standard series in 608 patients tested from 1990 to 1997 at Massachusetts General Hospital.
Albert MR; González S; González E
Am J Contact Dermat; 1998 Dec; 9(4):207-11. PubMed ID: 9810020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Lymphocyte proliferation testing in chromium allergic contact dermatitis.
Martins LE; Duarte AJ; Aoki V; Nunes RS; Ogusuku S; Reis VM
Clin Exp Dermatol; 2008 Jul; 33(4):472-7. PubMed ID: 18582233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Macro-video documentation patch tests.
Schuster C; Kränke B; Szolar-Platzer C; Aberer W
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Apr; 52(4):177-83. PubMed ID: 15859988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
