These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20823243)

  • 1. Long-term reductions in anthropogenic nutrients link to improvements in Chesapeake Bay habitat.
    Ruhl HA; Rybicki NB
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2010 Sep; 107(38):16566-70. PubMed ID: 20823243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-term nutrient reductions lead to the unprecedented recovery of a temperate coastal region.
    Lefcheck JS; Orth RJ; Dennison WC; Wilcox DJ; Murphy RR; Keisman J; Gurbisz C; Hannam M; Landry JB; Moore KA; Patrick CJ; Testa J; Weller DE; Batiuk RA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Apr; 115(14):3658-3662. PubMed ID: 29507225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nutrient limitation of phytoplankton in three tributaries of Chesapeake Bay: Detecting responses following nutrient reductions.
    Zhang Q; Fisher TR; Buchanan C; Gustafson AB; Karrh RR; Murphy RR; Testa JM; Tian R; Tango PJ
    Water Res; 2022 Nov; 226():119099. PubMed ID: 36302271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fish abundances in shoreline habitats and submerged aquatic vegetation in a tidal freshwater embayment of the Potomac River.
    Kraus RT; Jones RC
    Environ Monit Assess; 2012 May; 184(5):3341-57. PubMed ID: 21713468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Application of the benthic index of biotic integrity to environmental monitoring in Chesapeake Bay.
    Llansó RJ; Dauer DM; Vølstad JH; Scott LC
    Environ Monit Assess; 2003; 81(1-3):163-74. PubMed ID: 12620013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment and significance of phytoplankton species composition within Chesapeake Bay and Virginia tributaries through a long-term monitoring program.
    Marshall HG; Lane MF; Nesius KK; Burchardt L
    Environ Monit Assess; 2009 Mar; 150(1-4):143-55. PubMed ID: 19067200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development and evaluation of a spatially-explicit index of Chesapeake Bay health.
    Williams M; Longstaff B; Buchanan C; Llansó R; Dennison W
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2009; 59(1-3):14-25. PubMed ID: 19117579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effluent trading for water quality management: concept and application to the Chesapeake Bay watershed.
    Nishizawa E
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2003; 47(1-6):169-74. PubMed ID: 12787615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Chesapeake Bay's "forgotten" Anacostia River: eutrophication and nutrient reduction measures.
    Solomon CM; Jackson M; Glibert PM
    Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Apr; 191(5):265. PubMed ID: 30953208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Chesapeake Bay eutrophication: scientific understanding, ecosystem restoration, and challenges for agriculture.
    Boesch DF; Brinsfield RB; Magnien RE
    J Environ Qual; 2001; 30(2):303-20. PubMed ID: 11285890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nutrient reduction policies and management strategies of the Chesapeake Bay water quality restoration program.
    Randall CW
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 11496674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term phytoplankton trends and related water quality trends in the lower Chesapeake Bay, Virginia, USA.
    Marshall HG; Lane MF; Nesius KK
    Environ Monit Assess; 2003; 81(1-3):349-60. PubMed ID: 12620027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Linking fisheries to land use: How anthropogenic inputs from the watershed shape fish habitat quality.
    Giacomazzo M; Bertolo A; Brodeur P; Massicotte P; Goyette JO; Magnan P
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 May; 717():135377. PubMed ID: 31839291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Revisiting the Chesapeake Bay phytoplankton index of biotic integrity.
    Johnson JM; Buchanan C
    Environ Monit Assess; 2014 Mar; 186(3):1431-51. PubMed ID: 24114279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spatial scales and probability based sampling in determining levels of benthic community degradation in the Chesapeake Bay.
    Dauer DM; Llansó RJ
    Environ Monit Assess; 2003; 81(1-3):175-86. PubMed ID: 12620014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Complex interactions between autotrophs in shallow marine and freshwater ecosystems: implications for community responses to nutrient stress.
    Havens KE; Hauxwell J; Tyler AC; Thomas S; McGlathery KJ; Cebrian J; Valiela I; Steinman AD; Hwang SJ
    Environ Pollut; 2001; 113(1):95-107. PubMed ID: 11351765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing ecological integrity for impaired waters decisions in Chesapeake Bay, USA.
    Llansó RJ; Dauer DM; Vølstad JH
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2009; 59(1-3):48-53. PubMed ID: 19084878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Linking optimization and ecological models in a decision support tool for oyster restoration and management.
    North EW; King DM; Xu J; Hood RR; Newell RI; Paynter K; Kellogg ML; Liddel MK; Boesch DF
    Ecol Appl; 2010 Apr; 20(3):851-66. PubMed ID: 20437969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Historical eutrophication in a river-estuary complex in mid-coast Maine.
    Köster D; Lichter J; Lea PD; Nurse A
    Ecol Appl; 2007 Apr; 17(3):765-78. PubMed ID: 17494395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nutrient limitation of phytoplankton in Chesapeake Bay: Development of an empirical approach for water-quality management.
    Zhang Q; Fisher TR; Trentacoste EM; Buchanan C; Gustafson AB; Karrh R; Murphy RR; Keisman J; Wu C; Tian R; Testa JM; Tango PJ
    Water Res; 2021 Jan; 188():116407. PubMed ID: 33065415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.