144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20824376)
1. Comparing complications of esophagectomy and pancreaticoduodenectomy and potential impact on hospital systems utilizing the accordion severity grading system.
Low DE; Kuppusamy M; Hashimoto Y; Traverso LW
J Gastrointest Surg; 2010 Nov; 14(11):1646-52. PubMed ID: 20824376
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Accordion severity grading system: assessment of relationship between costs, length of hospital stay, and survival in patients with complications after esophagectomy for cancer.
Carrott PW; Markar SR; Kuppusamy MK; Traverso LW; Low DE
J Am Coll Surg; 2012 Sep; 215(3):331-6. PubMed ID: 22683069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Extremes of body mass index and postoperative complications after esophagectomy.
Wightman SC; Posner MC; Patti MG; Ganai S; Watson S; Prachand V; Ferguson MK
Dis Esophagus; 2017 May; 30(5):1-6. PubMed ID: 28375438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: A novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.
DeOliveira ML; Winter JM; Schafer M; Cunningham SC; Cameron JL; Yeo CJ; Clavien PA
Ann Surg; 2006 Dec; 244(6):931-7; discussion 937-9. PubMed ID: 17122618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Useful benchmarks to evaluate outcomes after esophagectomy and pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Traverso LW; Shinchi H; Low DE
Am J Surg; 2004 May; 187(5):604-8. PubMed ID: 15135674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laparoscopic vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy: overall outcomes and severity of complications using the Accordion Severity Grading System.
Asbun HJ; Stauffer JA
J Am Coll Surg; 2012 Dec; 215(6):810-9. PubMed ID: 22999327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: We need to redefine grades B and C.
Hackert T; Hinz U; Pausch T; Fesenbeck I; Strobel O; Schneider L; Fritz S; Büchler MW
Surgery; 2016 Mar; 159(3):872-7. PubMed ID: 26603847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Defining morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy: use of a prospective complication grading system.
Grobmyer SR; Pieracci FM; Allen PJ; Brennan MF; Jaques DP
J Am Coll Surg; 2007 Mar; 204(3):356-64. PubMed ID: 17324768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Early postoperative outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy in the elderly.
Haigh PI; Bilimoria KY; DiFronzo LA
Arch Surg; 2011 Jun; 146(6):715-23. PubMed ID: 21690449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Factors associated with failure of enhanced recovery after surgery program in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Zhang XY; Zhang XZ; Lu FY; Zhang Q; Chen W; Ma T; Bai XL; Liang TB
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2020 Feb; 19(1):51-57. PubMed ID: 31563597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Update on clinical impact, documentation, and management of complications associated with esophagectomy.
Low DE; Bodnar A
Thorac Surg Clin; 2013 Nov; 23(4):535-50. PubMed ID: 24199703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Grading of complications and risk factor evaluation in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
Asa Z; Greenberg R; Ghinea R; Inbar R; Wasserberg N; Avital S
Surg Endosc; 2013 Oct; 27(10):3748-53. PubMed ID: 23636522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative weighting of postoperative complications based on the accordion severity grading system: demonstration of potential impact using the american college of surgeons national surgical quality improvement program.
Porembka MR; Hall BL; Hirbe M; Strasberg SM
J Am Coll Surg; 2010 Mar; 210(3):286-98. PubMed ID: 20193891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Postoperative morbidity index: a quantitative measure of severity of postoperative complications.
Strasberg SM; Hall BL
J Am Coll Surg; 2011 Nov; 213(5):616-26. PubMed ID: 21871822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Non-Invasive Detection of Anastomotic Leakage Following Esophageal and Pancreatic Surgery by Urinary Analysis.
Plat VD; van Gaal N; Covington JA; Neal M; de Meij TGJ; van der Peet DL; Zonderhuis B; Kazemier G; de Boer NKH; Daams F
Dig Surg; 2019; 36(2):173-180. PubMed ID: 29909416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of complications after liver surgery: Two novel grading systems applied to patients undergoing hepatectomy.
Xu LN; Yang B; Li GP; Gao DW
J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci; 2017 Jun; 37(3):352-356. PubMed ID: 28585138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Establishing a quantitative benchmark for morbidity in pancreatoduodenectomy using ACS-NSQIP, the Accordion Severity Grading System, and the Postoperative Morbidity Index.
Vollmer CM; Lewis RS; Hall BL; Allendorf JD; Beane JD; Behrman SW; Callery MP; Christein JD; Drebin JA; Epelboym I; He J; Pitt HA; Winslow E; Wolfgang C; Strasberg SM
Ann Surg; 2015 Mar; 261(3):527-36. PubMed ID: 25268299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Post-discharge complications after esophagectomy account for high readmission rates.
Chen SY; Molena D; Stem M; Mungo B; Lidor AO
World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Jun; 22(22):5246-53. PubMed ID: 27298567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reducing postoperative complications and improving clinical outcome: Enhanced recovery after surgery in pancreaticoduodenectomy - A retrospective cohort study.
Dai J; Jiang Y; Fu D
Int J Surg; 2017 Mar; 39():176-181. PubMed ID: 28132917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Postoperative complications after transthoracic esophagectomy for cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction are correlated with early cancer recurrence: role of systematic grading of complications using the modified Clavien classification.
Lerut T; Moons J; Coosemans W; Van Raemdonck D; De Leyn P; Decaluwé H; Decker G; Nafteux P
Ann Surg; 2009 Nov; 250(5):798-807. PubMed ID: 19809297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
