These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2082452)
1. Quality assessment of blood pressure measurements in epidemiological surveys. The impact of last digit preference and the proportions of identical duplicate measurements. WHO Monica Project [corrected]. Hense HW; Kuulasmaa K; Zaborskis A; Kupsc W; Tuomilehto J Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1990; 38(5-6):463-8. PubMed ID: 2082452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of blood pressure measurement quality in the baseline surveys of the WHO MONICA project. Hense HW; Koivisto AM; Kuulasmaa K; Zaborskis A; Kupsc W; Tuomilehto J J Hum Hypertens; 1995 Dec; 9(12):935-46. PubMed ID: 8746637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Terminal digit bias in a specialty hypertension faculty practice. Thavarajah S; White WB; Mansoor GA J Hum Hypertens; 2003 Dec; 17(12):819-22. PubMed ID: 14704725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Who's really hypertensive?--Quality control issues in the assessment of blood pressure for randomized trials. Reid CM; Ryan P; Miles H; Willson K; Beilin LJ; Brown MA; Jennings GL; Johnston CI; Macdonald GJ; Marley JE; McNeil JJ; Morgan TO; West MJ; Wing LM Blood Press; 2005; 14(3):133-8. PubMed ID: 16036492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Blood pressure measurements in epidemiological surveys--time to change? Hense HW; Stieber J; Kuch B; Keil U Z Kardiol; 1996; 85 Suppl 3():66-70. PubMed ID: 8896302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Risk factor measurement quality in primary care routine data was variable but nondifferential between individuals. Lyratzopoulos G; Heller RF; Hanily M; Lewis PS J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Mar; 61(3):261-267. PubMed ID: 18226749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of observer and patient factors on the occurrence of digit preference for zero in blood pressure measurement in a hypertension specialty clinic: evidence for the need of continued observation. Graves JW; Bailey KR; Grossardt BR; Gullerud RE; Meverden RA; Grill DE; Sheps SG Am J Hypertens; 2006 Jun; 19(6):567-72. PubMed ID: 16733227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Reliability of arterial blood pressure measurement in an arterial hypertension study]. Leão de Aquino EM; Magalhães LC; Araújo MJ; Chagas de Almeida MC Arq Bras Cardiol; 1996 Jan; 66(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 8731319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of terminal digit preference on blood pressure measurement and treatment in primary care. Nietert PJ; Wessell AM; Feifer C; Ornstein SM Am J Hypertens; 2006 Feb; 19(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 16448884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. End-digit preference in general practice: a comparison of the conventional auscultatory and electronic oscillometric methods. Burnier M; Gasser UE Blood Press; 2008; 17(2):104-9. PubMed ID: 18568699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The 2004 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for the management of hypertension: Part I--Blood pressure measurement, diagnosis and assessment of risk. Hemmelgarn BR; Zarnke KB; Campbell NR; Feldman RD; McKay DW; McAlister FA; Khan N; Schiffrin EL; Myers MG; Bolli P; Honos G; Lebel M; Levine M; Padwal R; Can J Cardiol; 2004 Jan; 20(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 14968141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Blood pressure determination by traditionally trained personnel is less reliable and tends to underestimate the severity of moderate to severe hypertension. Roubsanthisuk W; Wongsurin U; Saravich S; Buranakitjaroen P Blood Press Monit; 2007 Apr; 12(2):61-8. PubMed ID: 17353647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Office blood pressure and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurements: high proportion of disagreement in resistant hypertension. Rodrigues CS; Bloch KV; da Rocha Nogueira A J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jul; 62(7):745-51. PubMed ID: 19128937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Quality assurance in Riva-Rocci blood pressure measurement: simultaneous sphygmomanometry with open and covered pressure display]. Hartmann B; Weise H; Bassenge E Z Kardiol; 1988 Aug; 77(8):537-42. PubMed ID: 3176598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Observer error in systolic blood pressure measurement in the elderly. A case for automatic recorders? Hla KM; Vokaty KA; Feussner JR Arch Intern Med; 1986 Dec; 146(12):2373-6. PubMed ID: 2877645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Are four duplicate remeasurements sufficient for diagnosing mild hypertension? Brueren M; Petri H; Schouten H; van Weel C; van Ree J J Hum Hypertens; 1996 Jun; 10(6):349-52. PubMed ID: 8872796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Blood pressure measurement in children; strongly varying in quality and interpretation]. Hirasing RA; Donckerwolcke RA Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1991 Jun; 135(22):983-6. PubMed ID: 2062394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using structural equation models to evaluate the magnitude of measurement error in blood pressure. Batista-Foguet JM; Coenders G; Ferragud MA Stat Med; 2001 Aug; 20(15):2351-68. PubMed ID: 11468768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Home blood pressure measurement may lead to less strict control of office blood pressure. Eto K; Tsuchihashi T; Ohta Y; Onaka U; Ueno M Clin Exp Hypertens; 2008 Apr; 30(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 18425702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]