These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20824669)

  • 1. Switchable transparency and wetting of elastomeric smart windows.
    Lee SG; Lee DY; Lim HS; Lee DH; Lee S; Cho K
    Adv Mater; 2010 Nov; 22(44):5013-7. PubMed ID: 20824669
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optical mechanotransduction with carbazole-based luminescent liquid single-crystal elastomers.
    Garcia-Amorós J; Velasco D
    Macromol Rapid Commun; 2015 Apr; 36(8):755-61. PubMed ID: 25704537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pillar versus dimple patterned surfaces for wettability and adhesion with varying scales.
    Li M; Dai Q; Huang W; Wang X
    J R Soc Interface; 2018 Nov; 15(148):. PubMed ID: 30429264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of disinfection and sterilization on the tensile strength, surface roughness, and wettability of elastomers.
    Kotha SB; Ramakrishnaiah R; Devang Divakar D; Celur SL; Qasim S; Matinlinna JP
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2017 Nov; 8(4):. PubMed ID: 27782374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hydrophilicity of unset and set elastomeric impression materials.
    Rupp F; Geis-Gerstorfer J
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(6):552-4. PubMed ID: 21209992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hydrophilicity of elastomeric non-aqueous impression materials during setting.
    Rupp F; Axmann D; Jacobi A; Groten M; Geis-Gerstorfer J
    Dent Mater; 2005 Feb; 21(2):94-102. PubMed ID: 15681007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A robust smart window: reversibly switching from high transparency to angle-independent structural color display.
    Ge D; Lee E; Yang L; Cho Y; Li M; Gianola DS; Yang S
    Adv Mater; 2015 Apr; 27(15):2489-95. PubMed ID: 25732127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A novel thermotropic elastomer based on highly-filled LDH-SSB composites.
    Das A; George JJ; Kutlu B; Leuteritz A; Wang DY; Rooj S; Jurk R; Rajeshbabu R; Stöckelhuber KW; Galiatsatos V; Heinrich G
    Macromol Rapid Commun; 2012 Feb; 33(4):337-42. PubMed ID: 22271599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Commentary. Tear strength of five elastomeric impression materials at two setting times and two tearing rates.
    Powers JM
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2008; 20(3):194. PubMed ID: 18533982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An evaluation of selected vinyl polysiloxane and vinyl polysiloxane-hybrid elastomeric impression materials.
    Megremis S; Tiba A; Vogt K; Geary R; Kuehne J
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2012 Apr; 143(4):405-6. PubMed ID: 22467705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Voltage-controlled surface wrinkling of elastomeric coatings.
    van den Ende D; Kamminga JD; Boersma A; Andritsch T; Steeneken PG
    Adv Mater; 2013 Jul; 25(25):3438-42. PubMed ID: 23703838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mechanically programmed shape change in laminated elastomeric composites.
    Robertson JM; Torbati AH; Rodriguez ED; Mao Y; Baker RM; Qi HJ; Mather PT
    Soft Matter; 2015 Jul; 11(28):5754-64. PubMed ID: 26086682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Force decay of elastomeric chains - a mechanical design and product comparison study.
    Balhoff DA; Shuldberg M; Hagan JL; Ballard RW; Armbruster PC
    J Orthod; 2011 Mar; 38(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 21367827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Elastomeric impression materials: factors to consider.
    Helvey GA
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2011 Oct; 32(8):58-9. PubMed ID: 22073812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of relative humidity on the hydrophilicity of unset elastomeric impression materials.
    Rupp F; Axmann D; Geis-Gerstorfer J
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(1):69-71. PubMed ID: 18350951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparative study to determine the wettability and castability of different elastomeric impression materials.
    Reddy GV; Reddy NS; Itttigi J; Jagadeesh KN
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 May; 13(3):356-63. PubMed ID: 22918010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Numerical study of effect of elastomeric stress absorbers on stress reduction in bone-dental implant interface.
    Mehdi G; Belarbi A; Mansouri B; Azari Z
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2015; 23(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 25760271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Elastomeric impression materials].
    Levartovsky S; Folkman M; Alter E; Pilo R
    Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2011 Apr; 28(2):54-64, 75. PubMed ID: 21848031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tear strength of five elastomeric impression materials at two setting times and two tearing rates.
    Lawson NC; Burgess JO; Litaker M
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2008; 20(3):186-93. PubMed ID: 18533981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sterilizing elastomeric chains without losing mechanical properties. Is it possible?
    Pithon MM; Ferraz CS; Rosa FC; Rosa LP
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(3):96-100. PubMed ID: 26154462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.