These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20825395)

  • 1. Likelihood methods for binary responses of present components in a cluster.
    Li X; Bandyopadhyay D; Lipsitz S; Sinha D
    Biometrics; 2011 Jun; 67(2):629-35. PubMed ID: 20825395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Association models for clustered data with binary and continuous responses.
    Lin L; Bandyopadhyay D; Lipsitz SR; Sinha D
    Biometrics; 2010 Mar; 66(1):287-93. PubMed ID: 19432772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bridging conditional and marginal inference for spatially referenced binary data.
    Boehm L; Reich BJ; Bandyopadhyay D
    Biometrics; 2013 Jun; 69(2):545-54. PubMed ID: 23724862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minimum Hellinger distance estimation for k-component poisson mixture with random effects.
    Xiang L; Yau KK; Van Hui Y; Lee AH
    Biometrics; 2008 Jun; 64(2):508-18. PubMed ID: 17970817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multilevel latent class models with dirichlet mixing distribution.
    Di CZ; Bandeen-Roche K
    Biometrics; 2011 Mar; 67(1):86-96. PubMed ID: 20560936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimation efficiency and tests of covariate effects with clustered binary data.
    Neuhaus JM
    Biometrics; 1993 Dec; 49(4):989-96. PubMed ID: 8117909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A general approach for two-stage analysis of multilevel clustered non-Gaussian data.
    Chervoneva I; Iglewicz B; Hyslop T
    Biometrics; 2006 Sep; 62(3):752-9. PubMed ID: 16984317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Semiparametric frailty models for clustered failure time data.
    Yu Z; Lin X; Tu W
    Biometrics; 2012 Jun; 68(2):429-36. PubMed ID: 22070739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bivariate categorical data analysis using normal linear conditional multinomial probability model.
    Sun B; Sutradhar B
    Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(3):469-86. PubMed ID: 25320019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analyzing spatially distributed binary data using independent-block estimating equations.
    Oman SD; Landsman V; Carmel Y; Kadmon R
    Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):892-900. PubMed ID: 17489971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficient pairwise composite likelihood estimation for spatial-clustered data.
    Bai Y; Kang J; Song PX
    Biometrics; 2014 Sep; 70(3):661-70. PubMed ID: 24945876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pseudo-value regression of clustered multistate current status data with informative cluster sizes.
    Anyaso-Samuel S; Bandyopadhyay D; Datta S
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2023 Aug; 32(8):1494-1510. PubMed ID: 37323013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance of a mixed effects logistic regression model for binary outcomes with unequal cluster size.
    Heo M; Leon AC
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(3):513-26. PubMed ID: 15920895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Informative cluster sizes for subcluster-level covariates and weighted generalized estimating equations.
    Huang Y; Leroux B
    Biometrics; 2011 Sep; 67(3):843-51. PubMed ID: 21281273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of population-averaged and cluster-specific models for the analysis of cluster randomized trials with missing binary outcomes: a simulation study.
    Ma J; Raina P; Beyene J; Thabane L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Jan; 13():9. PubMed ID: 23343209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of clustered binary outcomes using within-cluster paired resampling.
    Rieger RH; Weinberg CR
    Biometrics; 2002 Jun; 58(2):332-41. PubMed ID: 12071406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bias correction in random effects models with sparse binary responses.
    Korre AK; Vasdekis VG
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2023 Nov; 32(11):2226-2239. PubMed ID: 37776847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Association models for periodontal disease progression: a comparison of methods for clustered binary data.
    Ten Have TR; Landis JR; Weaver SL
    Stat Med; 1995 Feb; 14(4):413-29. PubMed ID: 7746980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Two random effects models for multivariate binary data.
    McDonald BW
    Biometrics; 1994 Mar; 50(1):164-72. PubMed ID: 8086599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inference for marginal linear models for clustered longitudinal data with potentially informative cluster sizes.
    Wang M; Kong M; Datta S
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2011 Aug; 20(4):347-67. PubMed ID: 20223781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.