BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20825844)

  • 1. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation feedback improves the quality of chest compression provided by hospital health care professionals.
    Pozner CN; Almozlino A; Elmer J; Poole S; McNamara D; Barash D
    Am J Emerg Med; 2011 Jul; 29(6):618-25. PubMed ID: 20825844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality and resuscitation training by combining audiovisual feedback and debriefing.
    Dine CJ; Gersh RE; Leary M; Riegel BJ; Bellini LM; Abella BS
    Crit Care Med; 2008 Oct; 36(10):2817-22. PubMed ID: 18766092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of chest compression rate guidance on the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation performed on manikins.
    Jäntti H; Silfvast T; Turpeinen A; Kiviniemi V; Uusaro A
    Resuscitation; 2009 Apr; 80(4):453-7. PubMed ID: 19203821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An audiovisual feedback device for compression depth, rate and complete chest recoil can improve the CPR performance of lay persons during self-training on a manikin.
    Krasteva V; Jekova I; Didon JP
    Physiol Meas; 2011 Jun; 32(6):687-99. PubMed ID: 21606561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of one-rescuer compression/ventilation ratios on cardiopulmonary resuscitation in infant, pediatric, and adult manikins.
    Srikantan SK; Berg RA; Cox T; Tice L; Nadkarni VM
    Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2005 May; 6(3):293-7. PubMed ID: 15857527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance of chest compressions with the use of a new audio-visual feedback device: a randomized manikin study in health care professionals.
    Wutzler A; Bannehr M; von Ulmenstein S; Loehr L; Förster J; Kühnle Y; Finn A; Storm C; Haverkamp W
    Resuscitation; 2015 Feb; 87():81-5. PubMed ID: 25449342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality of closed chest compression on a manikin in ambulance vehicles and flying helicopters with a real time automated feedback.
    Havel C; Schreiber W; Trimmel H; Malzer R; Haugk M; Richling N; Riedmüller E; Sterz F; Herkner H
    Resuscitation; 2010 Jan; 81(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 19926386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality of cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) during paediatric resuscitation training: time to stop the blind leading the blind.
    Arshid M; Lo TY; Reynolds F
    Resuscitation; 2009 May; 80(5):558-60. PubMed ID: 19328616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rescuer fatigue: standard versus continuous chest-compression cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
    Heidenreich JW; Berg RA; Higdon TA; Ewy GA; Kern KB; Sanders AB
    Acad Emerg Med; 2006 Oct; 13(10):1020-6. PubMed ID: 17015418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Incomplete chest wall decompression: a clinical evaluation of CPR performance by trained laypersons and an assessment of alternative manual chest compression-decompression techniques.
    Aufderheide TP; Pirrallo RG; Yannopoulos D; Klein JP; von Briesen C; Sparks CW; Deja KA; Kitscha DJ; Provo TA; Lurie KG
    Resuscitation; 2006 Dec; 71(3):341-51. PubMed ID: 17070644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation on manikins: on the floor and in the bed.
    Jäntti H; Silfvast T; Turpeinen A; Kiviniemi V; Uusaro A
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2009 Oct; 53(9):1131-7. PubMed ID: 19388894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interactive video instruction improves the quality of dispatcher-assisted chest compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation in simulated cardiac arrests.
    Yang CW; Wang HC; Chiang WC; Hsu CW; Chang WT; Yen ZS; Ko PC; Ma MH; Chen SC; Chang SC
    Crit Care Med; 2009 Feb; 37(2):490-5. PubMed ID: 19114904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects and limitations of an AED with audiovisual feedback for cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized manikin study.
    Fischer H; Gruber J; Neuhold S; Frantal S; Hochbrugger E; Herkner H; Schöchl H; Steinlechner B; Greif R
    Resuscitation; 2011 Jul; 82(7):902-7. PubMed ID: 21454006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of caregiver gender, age, and feedback prompts on chest compression rate and depth.
    Peberdy MA; Silver A; Ornato JP
    Resuscitation; 2009 Oct; 80(10):1169-74. PubMed ID: 19674826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Motion detection technology as a tool for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) quality training: a randomised crossover mannequin pilot study.
    Semeraro F; Frisoli A; Loconsole C; Bannò F; Tammaro G; Imbriaco G; Marchetti L; Cerchiari EL
    Resuscitation; 2013 Apr; 84(4):501-7. PubMed ID: 23238423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. CPR PRO® device reduces rescuer fatigue during continuous chest compression cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized crossover trial using a manikin model.
    Kovic I; Lulic D; Lulic I
    J Emerg Med; 2013 Oct; 45(4):570-7. PubMed ID: 23845522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of mattress deflection on CPR quality assessment for older children and adolescents.
    Nishisaki A; Nysaether J; Sutton R; Maltese M; Niles D; Donoghue A; Bishnoi R; Helfaer M; Perkins GD; Berg R; Arbogast K; Nadkarni V
    Resuscitation; 2009 May; 80(5):540-5. PubMed ID: 19342150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality of out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation with real time automated feedback: a prospective interventional study.
    Kramer-Johansen J; Myklebust H; Wik L; Fellows B; Svensson L; Sørebø H; Steen PA
    Resuscitation; 2006 Dec; 71(3):283-92. PubMed ID: 17070980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Incomplete chest wall decompression: a clinical evaluation of CPR performance by EMS personnel and assessment of alternative manual chest compression-decompression techniques.
    Aufderheide TP; Pirrallo RG; Yannopoulos D; Klein JP; von Briesen C; Sparks CW; Deja KA; Conrad CJ; Kitscha DJ; Provo TA; Lurie KG
    Resuscitation; 2005 Mar; 64(3):353-62. PubMed ID: 15733766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality of lay person CPR performance with compression: ventilation ratios 15:2, 30:2 or continuous chest compressions without ventilations on manikins.
    Odegaard S; Saether E; Steen PA; Wik L
    Resuscitation; 2006 Dec; 71(3):335-40. PubMed ID: 17069958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.