228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20826192)
1. Recontouring teeth and closing diastemas with direct composite buildups: a clinical evaluation of survival and quality parameters.
Wolff D; Kraus T; Schach C; Pritsch M; Mente J; Staehle HJ; Ding P
J Dent; 2010 Dec; 38(12):1001-9. PubMed ID: 20826192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Recontouring teeth and closing diastemas with direct composite buildups: a 5-year follow-up.
Frese C; Schiller P; Staehle HJ; Wolff D
J Dent; 2013 Nov; 41(11):979-85. PubMed ID: 23954577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A 6.5-year clinical follow-up of direct resin composite buildups in the posterior dentition: Introduction of a new minimally invasive restorative method.
Staehle HJ; Wohlrab T; Saure D; Wolff D; Frese C
J Dent; 2015 Oct; 43(10):1211-7. PubMed ID: 26165864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Closure of diastema and gingival recontouring using direct adhesive restorations: a case report.
De Araujo EM; Fortkamp S; Baratieri LN
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2009; 21(4):229-40. PubMed ID: 19689720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nine-year evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite open sandwich technique in Class II cavities.
Lindberg A; van Dijken JW; Lindberg M
J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 16956709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The evaluation of direct composite restorations for the worn mandibular anterior dentition - clinical performance and patient satisfaction.
Poyser NJ; Briggs PF; Chana HS; Kelleher MG; Porter RW; Patel MM
J Oral Rehabil; 2007 May; 34(5):361-76. PubMed ID: 17441877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical evaluation of direct cuspal coverage with posterior composite resin restorations.
Deliperi S; Bardwell DN
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2006; 18(5):256-65; discussion 266-7. PubMed ID: 16987320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up.
van Dijken JW
J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20193727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 17-year findings.
da Rosa Rodolpho PA; Cenci MS; Donassollo TA; Loguércio AD; Demarco FF
J Dent; 2006 Aug; 34(7):427-35. PubMed ID: 16314023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Seven-year clinical evaluation of painful cracked teeth restored with a direct composite restoration.
Opdam NJ; Roeters JJ; Loomans BA; Bronkhorst EM
J Endod; 2008 Jul; 34(7):808-11. PubMed ID: 18570984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Direct adhesive restoration of anterior teeth: Part 2. Clinical protocol.
de Araujo EM; Baratieri LN; Monteiro S; Vieira LC; de Andrada MA
Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2003 Jun; 15(5):351-7; quiz 359. PubMed ID: 12926402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Five-year clinical performance of posterior resin composite restorations placed by dental students.
Opdam NJ; Loomans BA; Roeters FJ; Bronkhorst EM
J Dent; 2004 Jul; 32(5):379-83. PubMed ID: 15193786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Management of extensive carious lesions in permanent molars of a child with nonmetallic bonded restorations--a case report.
el-Mowafy O
J Can Dent Assoc; 2000 Jun; 66(6):302-7. PubMed ID: 10927895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-year clinical evaluation of a flowable and a hybrid resin composite in non-carious cervical lesions.
Kubo S; Yokota H; Yokota H; Hayashi Y
J Dent; 2010 Mar; 38(3):191-200. PubMed ID: 19840829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A 4-year clinical evaluation of direct composite build-ups for space closure after orthodontic treatment.
Demirci M; Tuncer S; Öztaş E; Tekçe N; Uysal Ö
Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Dec; 19(9):2187-99. PubMed ID: 25802222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical performance of pulpotomized primary molars restored with resin-based materials. 24-month results.
Cehreli ZC; Cetinguc A; Cengiz SB; Altay AN
Am J Dent; 2006 Oct; 19(5):262-6. PubMed ID: 17073200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fiber-reinforced composite fixed dental prostheses in the anterior area: a 4.5-year follow-up.
Frese C; Schiller P; Staehle HJ; Wolff D
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 24529838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Eighteen-month clinical evaluation of microhybrid, packable and nanofilled resin composites in Class I restorations.
Sadeghi M; Lynch CD; Shahamat N
J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Jul; 37(7):532-7. PubMed ID: 20202097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Longevity of posterior resin composite restorations in permanent teeth in Public Dental Health Service: a prospective 8 years follow up.
Pallesen U; van Dijken JW; Halken J; Hallonsten AL; Höigaard R
J Dent; 2013 Apr; 41(4):297-306. PubMed ID: 23228499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Survival of self-etch adhesive Class II composite restorations using ART and conventional cavity preparations in primary molars.
Eden E; Topaloglu-Ak A; Frencken JE; van't Hof M
Am J Dent; 2006 Dec; 19(6):359-63. PubMed ID: 17212078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
