These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20826367)

  • 1. Evaluation of an experimental dental porcelain.
    Hamouda IM; El-Waseffy NA; Hasan AM; El-Falal AA
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2010 Nov; 3(8):610-8. PubMed ID: 20826367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Microstructure, hardness, corrosion resistance and porcelain shear bond strength comparison between cast and hot pressed CoCrMo alloy for metal-ceramic dental restorations.
    Henriques B; Soares D; Silva FS
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2012 Aug; 12():83-92. PubMed ID: 22659369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Strength, fracture toughness and microstructure of a selection of all-ceramic materials. Part I. Pressable and alumina glass-infiltrated ceramics.
    Guazzato M; Albakry M; Ringer SP; Swain MV
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jun; 20(5):441-8. PubMed ID: 15081550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of interface characterization and adhesion of glass ceramics to commercially pure titanium and gold alloy after thermal- and mechanical-loading.
    Vásquez VZ; Ozcan M; Kimpara ET
    Dent Mater; 2009 Feb; 25(2):221-31. PubMed ID: 18718654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of a high fracture toughness composite ceramic for dental applications.
    Aboushelib MN; Kleverlaan CJ; Feilzer AJ
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Oct; 17(7):538-44. PubMed ID: 18761572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of hydrofluoric acid surface treatment and bond strength of a zirconia veneering ceramic.
    Chaiyabutr Y; McGowan S; Phillips KM; Kois JC; Giordano RA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):194-202. PubMed ID: 18762031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of bond strength of a pressed ceramic fused to metal versus feldspathic porcelain fused to metal.
    Schweitzer DM; Goldstein GR; Ricci JL; Silva NR; Hittelman EL
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Dec; 14(4):239-47. PubMed ID: 16359480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Shear bond strength comparison between conventional porcelain fused to metal and new functionally graded dental restorations after thermal-mechanical cycling.
    Henriques B; Gonçalves S; Soares D; Silva FS
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2012 Sep; 13():194-205. PubMed ID: 22922336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Shear bond strength of metal-ceramic repair systems.
    dos Santos JG; Fonseca RG; Adabo GL; dos Santos Cruz CA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Sep; 96(3):165-73. PubMed ID: 16990069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the bond strength of laser-sintered and cast base metal dental alloys to porcelain.
    Akova T; Ucar Y; Tukay A; Balkaya MC; Brantley WA
    Dent Mater; 2008 Oct; 24(10):1400-4. PubMed ID: 18417202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of veneering porcelain thickness of all-ceramic and metal ceramic crowns on failure resistance after cyclic loading.
    Shirakura A; Lee H; Geminiani A; Ercoli C; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Feb; 101(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 19167536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Elastic constants, Vickers hardness, and fracture toughness of fluorrichterite-based glass-ceramics.
    Denry IL; Holloway JA
    Dent Mater; 2004 Mar; 20(3):213-9. PubMed ID: 15209226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of artificial saliva storage on microhardness and fracture toughness of a hydrothermal glass-ceramic.
    Fahmy NZ; El Guindy J; Zamzam M
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jun; 18(4):324-31. PubMed ID: 19486457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Shear bond strengths of a ceramic system to alternative metal alloys.
    de Melo RM; Travassos AC; Neisser MP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 15624000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of different bonding agents on shear bond strengths of composite-bonded porcelain to enamel.
    Cura C; Saraçoglu A; Cötert HS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):394-9. PubMed ID: 12690353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of soldering on metal-porcelain bond strength in repaired porcelain-fused-to-metal castings.
    Galindo DF; Ercoli C; Graser GN; Tallents RH; Moss ME
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jan; 85(1):88-94. PubMed ID: 11174684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bond strength and interfacial characterization of eight low fusing porcelains to cp Ti.
    Zinelis S; Barmpagadaki X; Vergos V; Chakmakchi M; Eliades G
    Dent Mater; 2010 Mar; 26(3):264-73. PubMed ID: 19962750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Shear bond strengths of 2 intraoral porcelain repair systems to porcelain or metal substrates.
    Haselton DR; Diaz-Arnold AM; Dunne JT
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Nov; 86(5):526-31. PubMed ID: 11725281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors affecting the shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded to different ceramic surfaces.
    Abu Alhaija ES; Abu AlReesh IA; AlWahadni AM
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 19903729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of ion exchange on the microstructure, strength, and thermal expansion behavior of a leucite-reinforced porcelain.
    Denry IL; Holloway JA; Rosenstiel SF
    J Dent Res; 1998 Apr; 77(4):583-8. PubMed ID: 9539461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.