These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20826472)

  • 21. Biomimetic surface coatings for atmospheric water capture prepared by dewetting of polymer films.
    Thickett SC; Neto C; Harris AT
    Adv Mater; 2011 Aug; 23(32):3718-22. PubMed ID: 21766344
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An evaluation of selected vinyl polysiloxane and vinyl polysiloxane-hybrid elastomeric impression materials.
    Megremis S; Tiba A; Vogt K; Geary R; Kuehne J
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2012 Apr; 143(4):405-6. PubMed ID: 22467705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Properties of the tray adhesive of an addition polymerizing silicone to impression tray materials.
    Sulong MZ; Setchell DJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Dec; 66(6):743-7. PubMed ID: 1805022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Fabrication of biomimetic superhydrophobic surface using hierarchical polyaniline spheres.
    Dong X; Wang J; Zhao Y; Wang Z; Wang S
    J Nanosci Nanotechnol; 2011 Jun; 11(6):5083-8. PubMed ID: 21770147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Rheological properties of vinyl polysiloxane impression pastes.
    Martinez JE; Combe EC; Pesun IJ
    Dent Mater; 2001 Nov; 17(6):471-6. PubMed ID: 11567683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Are you removing your PVS impression materials too soon?
    Lawson NC; Burgess JO
    Alpha Omegan; 2013; 106(1-2):38-9. PubMed ID: 24864397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The dynamic interaction of water with four dental impression materials during cure.
    Hosseinpour D; Berg JC
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jun; 18(4):292-300. PubMed ID: 19210607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Dimensional accuracy and surface detail reproduction of two hydrophilic vinyl polysiloxane impression materials tested under dry, moist, and wet conditions.
    Petrie CS; Walker MP; O'mahony AM; Spencer P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Oct; 90(4):365-72. PubMed ID: 14564291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Frictional adhesion of patterned surfaces and implications for gecko and biomimetic systems.
    Zeng H; Pesika N; Tian Y; Zhao B; Chen Y; Tirrell M; Turner KL; Israelachvili JN
    Langmuir; 2009 Jul; 25(13):7486-95. PubMed ID: 19522483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of disinfection of custom tray materials on adhesive properties of several impression material systems.
    Thompson GA; Vermilyea SG; Agar JR
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Dec; 72(6):651-6. PubMed ID: 7853264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Material gradients in fibrillar insect attachment systems: the role of joint-like elements.
    Heepe L; Höft S; Michels J; Gorb SN
    Soft Matter; 2018 Aug; 14(34):7026-7033. PubMed ID: 30109340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Influence of tray rigidity and impression technique on accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane impressions.
    Hoyos A; Soderholm KJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 21210004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A reversible wet/dry adhesive inspired by mussels and geckos.
    Lee H; Lee BP; Messersmith PB
    Nature; 2007 Jul; 448(7151):338-41. PubMed ID: 17637666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Poly(vinylmethylsiloxane) elastomer networks as functional materials for cell adhesion and migration studies.
    Ahmed S; Yang HK; Ozcam AE; Efimenko K; Weiger MC; Genzer J; Haugh JM
    Biomacromolecules; 2011 Apr; 12(4):1265-71. PubMed ID: 21361274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Multiscale effects and capillary interactions in functional biomimetic surfaces for energy conversion and green engineering.
    Nosonovsky M; Bhushan B
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2009 Apr; 367(1893):1511-39. PubMed ID: 19324721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Adhesive properties of several impression material systems: Part II.
    Chai JY; Jameson LM; Moser JB; Hesby RA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Sep; 66(3):287-92. PubMed ID: 1800721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Insects did it first: a micropatterned adhesive tape for robotic applications.
    Gorb SN; Sinha M; Peressadko A; Daltorio KA; Quinn RD
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2007 Dec; 2(4):S117-25. PubMed ID: 18037721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effect of custom tray material type and surface treatment on the tensile bond strength of an impression material/adhesive system.
    Dixon DL; Breeding LC; Bosser MJ; Nafso AJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 1993; 6(3):303-6. PubMed ID: 8397701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Hierarchical macroscopic fibrillar adhesives: in situ study of buckling and adhesion mechanisms on wavy substrates.
    Bauer CT; Kroner E; Fleck NA; Arzt E
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2015 Oct; 10(6):066002. PubMed ID: 26496128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [The study on surface porosity of die stone. Influence of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials].
    Okuda N; Ueno S; Kawada E; Nakanishi K; Sumii T
    Shikwa Gakuho; 1990 Feb; 90(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 2135095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.