BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20826895)

  • 1. Analysis of shielding calculation methods for 16- and 64-slice computed tomography facilities.
    Moreno C; Cenizo E; Bodineau C; Mateo B; Ortega EM
    J Radiol Prot; 2010 Sep; 30(3):557-65. PubMed ID: 20826895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Establishment of scatter factors for use in shielding calculations and risk assessment for computed tomography facilities.
    Wallace H; Martin CJ; Sutton DG; Peet D; Williams JR
    J Radiol Prot; 2012 Mar; 32(1):39-50. PubMed ID: 22327169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Criteria for establishing shielding of multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) rooms.
    Verdun FR; Aroua A; Baechler S; Schmidt S; Trueb PR; Bochud FO
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):403-9. PubMed ID: 20215444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of shielding calculation methods for multi-slice computed tomography (CT) systems.
    Cole JA; Platten DJ
    J Radiol Prot; 2008 Dec; 28(4):511-23. PubMed ID: 19029585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Monte Carlo based method to estimate radiation dose from multidetector CT (MDCT): cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms.
    DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Cody DD; Stevens DM; McCollough CH; O'Daniel J; McNitt-Gray MF
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):3989-4004. PubMed ID: 16177525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Shielding requirements in helical tomotherapy.
    Baechler S; Bochud FO; Verellen D; Moeckli R
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(16):5057-67. PubMed ID: 17671353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the CT scatter fractions provided in NCRP Report No. 147 to scanner-specific scatter fractions and the consequences for calculated barrier thickness.
    Larson SC; Goodsitt MM; Christodoulou EG; Larson LS
    Health Phys; 2007 Aug; 93(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 17622822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of deterministic and Monte Carlo methods in shielding design.
    Oliveira AD; Oliveira C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):254-7. PubMed ID: 16381723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mathematical modeling of the radiation dose received from photons passing over and through shielding walls in a PET/CT suite.
    Fog LS; Cormack J
    Health Phys; 2010 Dec; 99(6):769-79. PubMed ID: 21068595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of different methods for shielding design in computed tomography.
    Ciraj-Bjelac O; Arandjic D; Kosutic D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):133-6. PubMed ID: 21743070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monte Carlo simulation of a computed tomography x-ray tube.
    Bazalova M; Verhaegen F
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Oct; 52(19):5945-55. PubMed ID: 17881811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiation shielding design of a new tomotherapy facility.
    Zacarias A; Balog J; Mills M
    Health Phys; 2006 Oct; 91(4):289-95. PubMed ID: 16966872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Determination of the weighted CT dose index in modern multi-detector CT scanners.
    Perisinakis K; Damilakis J; Tzedakis A; Papadakis A; Theocharopoulos N; Gourtsoyiannis N
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Nov; 52(21):6485-95. PubMed ID: 17951857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of computed tomography shielding design methods using RadShield.
    DeLorenzo MC; Yang K; Wu DH; Wang W; Rutel IB
    J Radiol Prot; 2017 Jun; 37(2):492-505. PubMed ID: 28397710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiation shielding technology.
    Shultis JK; Faw RE
    Health Phys; 2005 Apr; 88(4):297-322. PubMed ID: 15761292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of the integrity of structural shielding of four computed tomography facilities in the greater Accra region of Ghana.
    Nkansah A; Schandorf C; Boadu M; Fletcher JJ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Aug; 155(4):423-31. PubMed ID: 23419904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Radiation shielding technology.
    Shultis JK; Faw RE
    Health Phys; 2005 Jun; 88(6):587-612. PubMed ID: 15891456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dosimetric considerations on TEPC fluka-simulation and measurements.
    Rollet S; Beck P; Ferrari A; Pelliccioni M; Autischer M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):833-7. PubMed ID: 15353755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of four methods used in determination of secondary shielding requirements for a teletherapy facility: a case study of 137Cs room in Tanzania.
    Muhogora WE; Nyanda AM; Ngoye WM
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2004 Dec; 61(6):1295-302. PubMed ID: 15388124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Neutron shielding calculations in a proton therapy facility based on Monte Carlo simulations and analytical models: criterion for selecting the method of choice.
    Titt U; Newhauser WD
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):144-8. PubMed ID: 16381702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.