These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20828724)
1. Nottingham grades of lobular carcinoma lack the prognostic implications they bear for ductal carcinoma. Wachtel MS; Halldorsson A; Dissanaike S J Surg Res; 2011 Mar; 166(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 20828724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical and biological characteristics of breast cancer. Kocic B; Filipovic S; Petrovic B; Mijalkovic D; Rancic N; Poultsidi A J BUON; 2010; 15(4):660-7. PubMed ID: 21229626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcomes of breast-conservation therapy for invasive lobular carcinoma are equivalent to those for invasive ductal carcinoma. Vo TN; Meric-Bernstam F; Yi M; Buchholz TA; Ames FC; Kuerer HM; Bedrosian I; Hunt KK Am J Surg; 2006 Oct; 192(4):552-5. PubMed ID: 16978974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Metaplastic carcinoma of the breast. Okada N; Hasebe T; Iwasaki M; Tamura N; Akashi-Tanaka S; Hojo T; Shibata T; Sasajima Y; Kanai Y; Kinoshita T Hum Pathol; 2010 Jul; 41(7):960-70. PubMed ID: 20236684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does routine grading of invasive lobular cancer of the breast have the same prognostic significance as for ductal cancers? Sinha PS; Bendall S; Bates T Eur J Surg Oncol; 2000 Dec; 26(8):733-7. PubMed ID: 11087636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Disseminated tumour cells in the bone marrow in early breast cancer: morphological categories of immunocytochemically positive cells have different impact on clinical outcome. Synnestvedt M; Borgen E; Schlichting E; Schirmer CB; Renolen A; Giercksky KE; Nesland JM; Naume B Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2013 Apr; 138(2):485-97. PubMed ID: 23456230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Triple-negative breast cancers: unique clinical presentations and outcomes. Billar JA; Dueck AC; Stucky CC; Gray RJ; Wasif N; Northfelt DW; McCullough AE; Pockaj BA Ann Surg Oncol; 2010 Oct; 17 Suppl 3():384-90. PubMed ID: 20853062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes in pleomorphic lobular breast carcinoma of the breast: a SEER population-based study. Yang LP; Sun HF; Zhao Y; Chen MT; Zhang N; Jin W Cancer Med; 2017 Dec; 6(12):2867-2875. PubMed ID: 29131529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Characteristics and prognosis of breast cancer in younger women. Dirier A; Burhanedtin-Zincircioglu S; Karadayi B; Isikdogan A; Aksu R J BUON; 2009; 14(4):619-23. PubMed ID: 20148452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bone metastasis is strongly associated with estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-negative breast carcinomas. Wei B; Wang J; Bourne P; Yang Q; Hicks D; Bu H; Tang P Hum Pathol; 2008 Dec; 39(12):1809-15. PubMed ID: 18715613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Observation of an increase in "aggressive tumor forms" in increasing incidence of breast carcinoma]. Engelhardt C; Sauerland C; Bettges G Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1996 Mar; 56(3):124-7. PubMed ID: 8674957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multicentric and multifocal versus unifocal breast cancer: is the tumor-node-metastasis classification justified? Weissenbacher TM; Zschage M; Janni W; Jeschke U; Dimpfl T; Mayr D; Rack B; Schindlbeck C; Friese K; Dian D Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Jul; 122(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 20454925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after breast-conserving treatment for early breast cancer: risk factors and impact on distant metastases. Komoike Y; Akiyama F; Iino Y; Ikeda T; Akashi-Tanaka S; Ohsumi S; Kusama M; Sano M; Shin E; Suemasu K; Sonoo H; Taguchi T; Nishi T; Nishimura R; Haga S; Mise K; Kinoshita T; Murakami S; Yoshimoto M; Tsukuma H; Inaji H Cancer; 2006 Jan; 106(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 16333848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. FOXA1 expression in breast cancer--correlation with luminal subtype A and survival. Badve S; Turbin D; Thorat MA; Morimiya A; Nielsen TO; Perou CM; Dunn S; Huntsman DG; Nakshatri H Clin Cancer Res; 2007 Aug; 13(15 Pt 1):4415-21. PubMed ID: 17671124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of the clinical outcomes of patients with invasive lobular carcinoma and invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast according to molecular subtype in a Korean population. Lim ST; Yu JH; Park HK; Moon BI; Ko BK; Suh YJ World J Surg Oncol; 2014 Mar; 12():56. PubMed ID: 24621330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Similar long-term results of breast-conservation treatment for Stage I and II invasive lobular carcinoma compared with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: The University of Pennsylvania experience. Santiago RJ; Harris EE; Qin L; Hwang WT; Solin LJ Cancer; 2005 Jun; 103(12):2447-54. PubMed ID: 15887223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prognostic factors for patients with liver metastases from breast cancer. Eichbaum MH; Kaltwasser M; Bruckner T; de Rossi TM; Schneeweiss A; Sohn C Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Mar; 96(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 16319993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Primary breast cancer phenotypes associated with propensity for central nervous system metastases. Tham YL; Sexton K; Kramer R; Hilsenbeck S; Elledge R Cancer; 2006 Aug; 107(4):696-704. PubMed ID: 16826579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Invasive lobular breast cancer: does grade matter? Margenthaler JA J Surg Res; 2011 Jul; 169(1):16-8. PubMed ID: 20850783 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]