These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20829151)

  • 21. Effect of finishing time and techniques on marginal sealing ability of two composite restorative materials.
    Lopes GC; Franke M; Maia HP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 12239477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A clinical evaluation of packable and microhybrid resin composite restorations: one-year report.
    de Souza FB; Guimarães RP; Silva CH
    Quintessence Int; 2005 Jan; 36(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 15709496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Three-year follow up assessment of Class II restorations in primary molars with a polyacid-modified composite resin and a hybrid composite.
    Attin T; Opatowski A; Meyer C; Zingg-Meyer B; Buchalla W; Mönting JS
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 11572292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Clinical evaluation of a nanofilled composite in posterior teeth: 12-month results.
    Dresch W; Volpato S; Gomes JC; Ribeiro NR; Reis A; Loguercio AD
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):409-17. PubMed ID: 16924980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A split-mouth randomized clinical trial of conventional and heavy flowable composites in class II restorations.
    Rocha Gomes Torres C; Rêgo HM; Perote LC; Santos LF; Kamozaki MB; Gutierrez NC; Di Nicoló R; Borges AB
    J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):793-9. PubMed ID: 24769385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. One-year comparison of metallic and translucent matrices in Class II composite resin restorations.
    Cenci MS; Demarco FF; Pereira CL; Lund RG; de Carvalho RM
    Am J Dent; 2007 Feb; 20(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 17380807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. 36-month clinical evaluation of two adhesives and microhybrid resin composites in Class I restorations.
    Swift EJ; Ritter AV; Heymann HO; Sturdevant JR; Wilder AD
    Am J Dent; 2008 Jun; 21(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 18686764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Practical posterior composites. Efficient placement and predictable results.
    Griffin JD
    Dent Today; 2003 Feb; 22(2):112-7. PubMed ID: 12680270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A clinical evaluation of a giomer restorative system containing surface prereacted glass ionomer filler: results from a 13-year recall examination.
    Gordan VV; Blaser PK; Watson RE; Mjör IA; McEdward DL; Sensi LG; Riley JL
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2014 Oct; 145(10):1036-43. PubMed ID: 25270702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Flowable materials as an intermediate layer could improve the marginal and internal adaptation of composite restorations in Class-V-cavities.
    Li Q; Jepsen S; Albers HK; Eberhard J
    Dent Mater; 2006 Mar; 22(3):250-7. PubMed ID: 16084584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Class II restorations with a polyacid-modified composite resin in primary molars placed in a dental practice: results of a two-year clinical evaluation.
    Attin T; Opatowski A; Meyer C; Zingg-Meyer B; Mönting JS
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):259-64. PubMed ID: 11203828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Nanocomposites provide reliability and aesthetics.
    Wu JC
    Dent Today; 2010 Jul; 29(7):128-9. PubMed ID: 20687440
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Clinical evaluation of polyacid-modified resin composite posterior restorations: one-year results.
    Luo Y; Lo EC; Fang DT; Wei SH
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Oct; 31(9):630-6. PubMed ID: 11203987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. One-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite restorative material in unprepared Class V restorations.
    Brackett MG; Dib A; Brackett WW; Estrada BE; Reyes AA
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 11931132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. SEM evaluation of marginal sealing on composite restorations using different photoactivation and composite insertion methods.
    Lopes MB; Costa LA; Consani S; Gonini AJ; Sinhoreti MA
    Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(4):394-9. PubMed ID: 20139558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Management of extensive carious lesions in permanent molars of a child with nonmetallic bonded restorations--a case report.
    el-Mowafy O
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2000 Jun; 66(6):302-7. PubMed ID: 10927895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Three-year clinical evaluation of cuspal coverage with combined composite-amalgam in endodontically-treated maxillary premolars.
    Shafiei F; Memarpour M; Doozandeh M
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):599-604. PubMed ID: 21179997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 6-year results.
    Busato AL; Loguercio AD; Reis A; Carrilho MR
    Am J Dent; 2001 Oct; 14(5):304-8. PubMed ID: 11803995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Marginal leakage of filled dentin adhesives used with wet and dry bonding techniques.
    Santini A; Plasschaert AJ; Mitchell S
    Am J Dent; 2000 Apr; 13(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 11764834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Randomized controlled trial of the 2-year clinical performance of a silorane-based resin composite in class 1 posterior restorations.
    Efes BG; Yaman BC; Gurbuz O; Gumuştaş B
    Am J Dent; 2013 Feb; 26(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 23724547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.