These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2082954)

  • 21. Court-ordered care--a complication of pregnancy to avoid.
    Cantor JD
    N Engl J Med; 2012 Jun; 366(24):2237-40. PubMed ID: 22693994
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Maternal versus fetal rights--a clinical dilemma.
    Shriner TL
    Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Apr; 53(4):518-9. PubMed ID: 440658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Foreclosing the use of force: A.C. reversed.
    Annas GJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(4):27-9. PubMed ID: 2211083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Court-ordered obstetrical interventions.
    Kolder VE; Gallagher J; Parsons MT
    N Engl J Med; 1987 May; 316(19):1192-6. PubMed ID: 3574370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The right to say no.
    Ferguson P
    Nurs Times; 1998 Jun 10-16; 94(23):28-30. PubMed ID: 9687749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Inside the womb, outside the law.
    Murphy D
    Nurs Times; 1998 Jun 10-16; 94(23):32. PubMed ID: 9687751
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Court-ordered cesarean poses ethical questions.
    NAACOG Newsl; 1988 Feb; 15(2):1, 5. PubMed ID: 3126394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An Orwellian scenario: court ordered caesarean section and women's autonomy.
    Cahill H
    Nurs Ethics; 1999 Nov; 6(6):494-505. PubMed ID: 10696195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An upside-down world?
    Hewson B
    Mod Midwife; 1997 May; 7(5):18-9. PubMed ID: 9224034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The delivery dilemma: a question of competency.
    Cushing M
    Am J Nurs; 1993 Apr; 93(4):20-2. PubMed ID: 8480798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Patients' Bill of Rights: women's rights under managed care and ERISA preemption.
    Theodos TF
    Am J Law Med; 2000; 26(1):89-108. PubMed ID: 10791118
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Protecting the liberty of pregnant patients.
    Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 1987 May; 316(19):1213-4. PubMed ID: 3574372
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The right to choose.
    Savage W
    Nurs Stand; 1998 May 20-26; 12(35):14. PubMed ID: 9687689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Consent and marital status--the legalities.
    Rozovsky LE; Rozovsky FA
    Can Oper Room Nurs J; 1986 Jun; 4(3):19-20. PubMed ID: 3639758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The constitutionality of court imposed contraception as a condition of probation.
    Mubaraki M
    Crim Justice J; 1992; 14(2):385-405. PubMed ID: 16700114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Abortion 1990s: contemporary issues and the activist court.
    Bertz RC
    West State Univ Law Rev; 1992; 19(2):393-429. PubMed ID: 16047452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Women's rights versus the protection of fetuses.
    Warren MA
    Midwest Med Ethics; 1991; 7(1):1, 3-7. PubMed ID: 16145788
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Prenatal v. parental rights: what a difference an "a" makes.
    Gallagher A
    St Marys Law J; 1989; 21(2):301-24. PubMed ID: 16100799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Compulsory Caesarean sections: an English perspective.
    Francis R
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1998; 14(2):365-89. PubMed ID: 9693485
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Criminalization of pregnant substance abusers: a health care perspective.
    Popovits RM
    J Health Hosp Law; 1991 Jun; 24(6):169-81. PubMed ID: 10170728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.