These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20829698)

  • 1. Technology-limited and patient-derived versus audibility-derived fittings in bone-anchored hearing aid users: a validation study.
    Hodgetts WE; Hagler P; Hakansson BE; Soli SD
    Ear Hear; 2011 Feb; 32(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 20829698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Audiometric evaluation of bilaterally fitted bone-anchored hearing aids.
    Bosman AJ; Snik AF; van der Pouw CT; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
    Audiology; 2001; 40(3):158-67. PubMed ID: 11465298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fitting range of the BAHA Cordelle.
    Bosman AJ; Snik AF; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Aug; 45(8):429-37. PubMed ID: 17005485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Better performance with bone-anchored hearing aid than acoustic devices in patients with severe air-bone gap.
    de Wolf MJ; Hendrix S; Cremers CW; Snik AF
    Laryngoscope; 2011 Mar; 121(3):613-6. PubMed ID: 21344443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of three approaches to verifying aided Baha output.
    Hodgetts WE; Håkansson BE; Hagler P; Soli S
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Apr; 49(4):286-95. PubMed ID: 20053158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Active middle ear implant compared with open-fit hearing aid in sloping high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
    Boeheim K; Pok SM; Schloegel M; Filzmoser P
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Apr; 31(3):424-9. PubMed ID: 20042907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electroacoustic evaluation of frequency-modulated receivers interfaced with personal hearing aids.
    Schafer EC; Thibodeau LM; Whalen HS; Overson GJ
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2007 Oct; 38(4):315-26. PubMed ID: 17890512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The bone-anchored hearing aid compared with conventional hearing aids. Audiologic results and the patients' opinions.
    Snik AF; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1995 Feb; 28(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 7739870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Personality, hearing problems, and amplification characteristics: contributions to self-report hearing aid outcomes.
    Cox RM; Alexander GC; Gray GA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):141-62. PubMed ID: 17496667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bone-anchored Hearing Aids: correlation between pure-tone thresholds and outcome in three user groups.
    Pfiffner F; Kompis M; Stieger C
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):884-90. PubMed ID: 19730146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The bone-anchored hearing aid. Design principles, indications, and long-term clinical results.
    Tjellström A; Håkansson B
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1995 Feb; 28(1):53-72. PubMed ID: 7739869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Functional benefit of the bone-anchored hearing aid with different auditory profiles: objective and subjective measures.
    van Wieringen A; De Voecht K; Bosman AJ; Wouters J
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2011 Apr; 36(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 21414178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term results with the titanium bone-anchored hearing aid: the U.S. experience.
    Wazen JJ; Caruso M; Tjellstrom A
    Am J Otol; 1998 Nov; 19(6):737-41. PubMed ID: 9831146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Improvement of hearing aid fitting with digital aids and new fitting strategies].
    Schorn K; Baumann U
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1999 Jan; 78(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 10080122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fitting range of the BAHA Intenso.
    Bosman AJ; Snik FM; Mylanus EA; Cremers WR
    Int J Audiol; 2009; 48(6):346-52. PubMed ID: 19925342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tolerable hearing aid delays. V. Estimation of limits for open canal fittings.
    Stone MA; Moore BC; Meisenbacher K; Derleth RP
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):601-17. PubMed ID: 18469715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Results of the bone-anchored hearing aid in unilateral hearing loss.
    Wazen JJ; Spitzer J; Ghossaini SN; Kacker A; Zschommler A
    Laryngoscope; 2001 Jun; 111(6):955-8. PubMed ID: 11404603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the audiologic results obtained with the bone-anchored hearing aid attached to the headband, the testband, and to the "snap" abutment.
    Verstraeten N; Zarowski AJ; Somers T; Riff D; Offeciers EF
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Jan; 30(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 18957902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical results with a percutaneous bone-anchored hearing aid.
    Abramson M; Fay TH; Kelly JP; Wazen JJ; Liden G; Tjellstrom A
    Laryngoscope; 1989 Jul; 99(7 Pt 1):707-10. PubMed ID: 2747393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The bone-anchored hearing aid: quality-of-life assessment.
    Hol MK; Spath MA; Krabbe PF; van der Pouw CT; Snik AF; Cremers CW; Mylanus EA
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 Apr; 130(4):394-9. PubMed ID: 15096420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.