These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
8. Working times of elastomeric impression materials determined by dimensional accuracy. Tan E; Chai J; Wozniak WT Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(2):188-96. PubMed ID: 8639243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of complete dental arch impressions and stone casts using a three-dimensional measurement system. Effects on accuracy of rubber impression materials and trays. Ishida K Dent Jpn (Tokyo); 1990; 27(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 2099294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Correlation between the degree of deformation of the stone die and the amount of the master die undercut. Part 1. Single tooth die. Murakami H; Takehana S; Abe T; Yamamoto Y; Takenaka M Aichi Gakuin Dent Sci; 1989; 2():57-65. PubMed ID: 2701499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of water temperature on the accuracy of stone casts recovered from addition-reaction elastomeric impression materials. Saunders WP; Sharkey SW; Smith GM Int J Prosthodont; 1990; 3(6):577-81. PubMed ID: 2083027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study. Caputi S; Varvara G J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Qualitative and quantitative three-dimensional accuracy of a single tooth captured by elastomeric impression materials: an in vitro study. Schaefer O; Schmidt M; Goebel R; Kuepper H J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Sep; 108(3):165-72. PubMed ID: 22944312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of 2 impression techniques for ITI implants. Akça K; Cehreli MC Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(4):517-23. PubMed ID: 15346748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Working time of elastomeric impression materials: relevance of rheological tests. Balkenhol M; Kanehira M; Finger WJ; Wöstmann B Am J Dent; 2007 Dec; 20(6):347-52. PubMed ID: 18269123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions. Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of sulcular width on the linear accuracy of impression materials in the presence of an undercut. Baharav H; Kupershmidt I; Laufer BZ; Cardash HS Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(5):585-9. PubMed ID: 15543916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of five impression techniques on the dimensional accuracy of master models. Fenske C Braz Dent J; 2000; 11(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 11210270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Compatibility of impressions and die stone material. Omana HM; Rinne VW; Truong TT Oper Dent; 1990; 15(3):82-5. PubMed ID: 2133931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions: virtual three-dimensional analysis of exactness. Persson AS; Odén A; Andersson M; Sandborgh-Englund G Dent Mater; 2009 Jul; 25(7):929-36. PubMed ID: 19264353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]