These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20830738)

  • 41. Biomechanical analysis of distal femur fracture fixation: fixed-angle screw-plate construct versus condylar blade plate.
    Higgins TF; Pittman G; Hines J; Bachus KN
    J Orthop Trauma; 2007 Jan; 21(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 17211268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Intertrochanteric fractures of the hip treated with the hip compression screw: analysis of problems.
    Doherty JH; Lyden JP
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1979 Jun; (141):184-7. PubMed ID: 477103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Dynamic hip screw versus 3 parallel screws in the treatment of garden 1 + 2 and garden 3 + 4 cervical hip fractures.
    Levi N
    Panminerva Med; 1999 Sep; 41(3):233-7. PubMed ID: 10568121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A laboratory model to evaluate cutout resistance of implants for pertrochanteric fracture fixation.
    Sommers MB; Roth C; Hall H; Kam BC; Ehmke LW; Krieg JC; Madey SM; Bottlang M
    J Orthop Trauma; 2004 Jul; 18(6):361-8. PubMed ID: 15213501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Is the rotation of the femoral head a potential initiation for cutting out? A theoretical and experimental approach.
    Lenich A; Bachmeier S; Prantl L; Nerlich M; Hammer J; Mayr E; Al-Munajjed AA; Füchtmeier B
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2011 Apr; 12():79. PubMed ID: 21513536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Which screw?].
    Håheim LL
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2001 Oct; 121(24):2862. PubMed ID: 11706501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparison of migration behavior between single and dual lag screw implants for intertrochanteric fracture fixation.
    Kouvidis GK; Sommers MB; Giannoudis PV; Katonis PG; Bottlang M
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2009 May; 4():16. PubMed ID: 19450283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Combined NoLok/Keyed Compression Hip Screw System.
    Orthop Nurs; 1989; 8(5):36-7. PubMed ID: 2797851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Influence of reduced tip-apex distance on helical blade fixation-a biomechanical study.
    Lenz M; Schwinn J; Hofmann-Fliri L; Schwyn R; Knobe M; Klos K; Kielstein H; Hofmann GO; Gueorguiev B
    J Orthop Res; 2019 Mar; 37(3):649-654. PubMed ID: 30548876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Peri-implant bone microstructure determines dynamic implant cut-out.
    Basler SE; Traxler J; Müller R; van Lenthe GH
    Med Eng Phys; 2013 Oct; 35(10):1442-9. PubMed ID: 23623173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Analysis of the micro-migration of sliding hip screws by using point-based registration.
    Raudaschl P; Fritscher K; Roth T; Kammerlander C; Schubert R
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2010 Sep; 5(5):455-60. PubMed ID: 20567950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Unacceptable variation in the core diameters of some AO type cancellous screws.
    J R Soc Med; 1989 Mar; 82(3):181. PubMed ID: 2704019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [The overhang sign and the screw sign in the early diagnosis of coxarthritis].
    FRANCON F; PERLES L
    Acta Physiother Rheumatol Belg; 1950; 5(2):87-9. PubMed ID: 15432214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Early Experience with the Trochanteric Fixation Nail-Advanced (TFN-A): A Descriptive Review of Thirty-Four Cases from a Single Center.
    Unsay JC; Chua Tjun Huat I; Kwek Beng Kee E
    Indian J Orthop; 2020 Dec; 54(Suppl 2):246-253. PubMed ID: 33194098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Impact of blade direction on postoperative femoral head varus in PFNA fixed patients: a clinical review and biomechanical research.
    Xu Y; Zhang X; Li J; Miao Y; Ying P; Chen C; Xu W; Wang Q
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2024; 12():1381201. PubMed ID: 39070167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Meta-analysis of the clinical efficacy of the Gamma3 nail
    Wu X; Gao B
    World J Orthop; 2024 Mar; 15(3):285-292. PubMed ID: 38596186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Research progress on evaluation methods for head-neck nail position in femoral intertrochanteric fractures].
    Fei L; Zheng X; Xu X; Ye J
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Sep; 37(9):1149-1155. PubMed ID: 37718430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Which head element is more effective for cement augmentation of TFNA? Helical blade versus lag screw.
    Mitsuzawa S; Nakamata T; Mitamura S; Yasuda T; Matsuda S
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2023 Jul; 24(1):544. PubMed ID: 37400808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. U-blade gamma 3 vs. gamma 3 nails for intertrochanteric hip fracture: Meta-analysis.
    Mariscal G; Lorente R; Barrios C
    Front Surg; 2022; 9():1015554. PubMed ID: 36504573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Biomechanical comparison of lag screw and non-spiral blade fixation of a novel femoral trochanteric nail in an osteoporotic bone model.
    Fuse Y; Zenke Y; Okimoto N; Yoshioka T; Yamanaka Y; Kawasaki M; Terayama H; Sakai A
    Sci Rep; 2022 Jan; 12(1):782. PubMed ID: 35039574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.