These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20830883)
1. The effect of cuspal coverage on the fracture resistance of teeth restored with indirect composite resin restorations. Burke FJ; Wilson NH; Watts DC Quintessence Int; 1993 Dec; 24(12):875-80. PubMed ID: 20830883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of cavity design and restorative material on the fracture resistance of maxillary premolars. Cubas GB; Camacho GB; Pereira-Cenci T; Nonaka T; Barbin EL Gen Dent; 2010; 58(2):e84-8. PubMed ID: 20236909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of fracture resistance of teeth restored with ceramic inlay and resin composite: an in vitro study. Desai PD; Das UK Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):877. PubMed ID: 22484893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fracture resistance of root filled premolar teeth restored with direct composite resin with or without cusp coverage. Xie KX; Wang XY; Gao XJ; Yuan CY; Li JX; Chu CH Int Endod J; 2012 Jun; 45(6):524-9. PubMed ID: 22242600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of fiber post and cusp coverage on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars directly restored with composite resin. Mohammadi N; Kahnamoii MA; Yeganeh PK; Navimipour EJ J Endod; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1428-32. PubMed ID: 19801245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of cavity preparation design on fracture strength and mode of fracture of laboratory-processed composite resin restorations. Fonseca RB; Fernandes-Neto AJ; Correr-Sobrinho L; Soares CJ J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Oct; 98(4):277-84. PubMed ID: 17936127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with extensive composite resin restorations. Plotino G; Buono L; Grande NM; Lamorgese V; Somma F J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Mar; 99(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 18319094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tensile bond strength and flexural modulus of resin cements--influence on the fracture resistance of teeth restored with ceramic inlays. Habekost Lde V; Camacho GB; Demarco FF; Powers JM Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):488-95. PubMed ID: 17910226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Resistance to maxillary premolar fractures after restoration of class II preparations with resin composite or ceromer. de Freitas CR; Miranda MI; de Andrade MF; Flores VH; Vaz LG; Guimarães C Quintessence Int; 2002 Sep; 33(8):589-94. PubMed ID: 12238690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with indirect composite resins: the effect of alternative luting procedures. Burke FJ; Wilson NH; Watts DC Quintessence Int; 1994 Apr; 25(4):269-75. PubMed ID: 8058900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of laminate technique using glass ionomer and resin composite for restoration of root filled teeth. Taha NA; Palamara JE; Messer HH J Dent; 2012 Aug; 40(8):617-23. PubMed ID: 22521705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Class II composite restorations: importance of cervical enamel in vitro. Laegreid T; Gjerdet NR; Vult von Steyern P; Johansson AK Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 21777100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fracture resistance and microtensile bond strength of maxillary premolars restored with two resin composite inlay systems. Sun YS; Chen YM; Smales RJ; Yip KH Am J Dent; 2008 Apr; 21(2):97-100. PubMed ID: 18578176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth, with variable marginal ridge thicknesses, restored with composite resin and composite resin reinforced with Ribbond: an in vitro study. Kalburge V; Yakub SS; Kalburge J; Hiremath H; Chandurkar A Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 23965445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]