These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20830891)

  • 1. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of cermet tunnel restorations on primary molars.
    Zenkner JE; Baratieri LN; Monteiro SJ; de Andrada MA; Vieira LC
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Nov; 24(11):783-91. PubMed ID: 20830891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A 3-year clinical evaluation of Ketac-Silver restorations in primary molars.
    Holst A
    Swed Dent J; 1996; 20(6):209-14. PubMed ID: 9065982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical performance of a compomer and amalgam for the interproximal restoration of primary molars: a 24-month evaluation.
    Duggal MS; Toumba KJ; Sharma NK
    Br Dent J; 2002 Sep; 193(6):339-42. PubMed ID: 12368893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical evaluation of glass-ionomer tunnel restorations in primary molars: 36 months results.
    Markovic D; Peric T
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Mar; 53(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 18304240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of factors affecting failure of glass cermet tunnel restorations in a multi-center study.
    Pilebro CE; van Dijken JW
    Clin Oral Investig; 2001 Jun; 5(2):96-101. PubMed ID: 11480816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Randomized clinical trial of adhesive restorations in primary molars. 18-month results.
    Casagrande L; Dalpian DM; Ardenghi TM; Zanatta FB; Balbinot CE; García-Godoy F; De Araujo FB
    Am J Dent; 2013 Dec; 26(6):351-5. PubMed ID: 24640441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A 3-year clinical study of tunnel restorations.
    Strand GV; Nordbø H; Tveit AB; Espelid I; Wikstrand K; Eide GE
    Eur J Oral Sci; 1996 Aug; 104(4 ( Pt 1)):384-9. PubMed ID: 8930587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical evaluation of composite resin tunnel restorations on primary molars.
    de Freitas AR; de Andrada MA; Baratieri LN; Monteiro Júnior S; de Sousa CN
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Jun; 25(6):419-24. PubMed ID: 7938431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Glass ionomer-silver cermet Class II tunnel-restorations for primary molars.
    Croll TP
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1988; 55(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 2968382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Randomised trial of resin-based restorations in Class I and Class II beveled preparations in primary molars: 48-month results.
    Alves dos Santos MP; Luiz RR; Maia LC
    J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):451-9. PubMed ID: 20188783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tunnel restorations in permanent teeth. A 7 year follow up study.
    Hasselrot L
    Swed Dent J; 1998; 22(1-2):1-7. PubMed ID: 9646387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical evaluation of three caries removal approaches in primary teeth: a randomised controlled trial.
    Phonghanyudh A; Phantumvanit P; Songpaisan Y; Petersen PE
    Community Dent Health; 2012 Jun; 29(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 22779380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tunnel restorations. A 3 1/2-year follow up study of Class I and II tunnel restorations in permanent and primary teeth.
    Hasselrot L
    Swed Dent J; 1993; 17(5):173-82. PubMed ID: 8291027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study.
    Kavvadia K; Kakaboura A; Vanderas AP; Papagiannoulis L
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Restoration of small proximal dentin lesions with the tunnel technique. A 3-year clinical study performed in Public Dental Service clinics.
    Holst A; Brännström M
    Swed Dent J; 1998; 22(4):143-8. PubMed ID: 9850556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical evaluation of atraumatic restorations in primary molars: a comparison between 2 glass ionomer cements.
    Menezes JP; Rosenblatt A; Medeiros E
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2006; 73(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 16948370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Class II amalgam restorations, glass-ionomer tunnel restorations, and caries development on adjacent tooth surfaces: a 3-year clinical study.
    Svanberg M
    Caries Res; 1992; 26(4):315-8. PubMed ID: 1423449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Randomized controlled clinical trial of the 24-months survival of composite resin restorations after one-step incomplete and complete excavation on primary teeth.
    Franzon R; Opdam NJ; Guimarães LF; Demarco FF; Casagrande L; Haas AN; Araujo FB
    J Dent; 2015 Oct; 43(10):1235-41. PubMed ID: 26231301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach for the management of dental caries.
    Smales RJ; Yip HK
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Jun; 33(6):427-32. PubMed ID: 12073723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Class II glass ionomer cermet tunnel, resin sandwich and amalgam restorations over 2 years.
    Wilkie R; Lidums A; Smales R
    Am J Dent; 1993 Aug; 6(4):181-4. PubMed ID: 7803004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.