301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20830892)
21. Reduction of marginal gaps in composite restorations by use of glass-ceramic inserts.
George LA; Richards ND; Eichmiller FC
Oper Dent; 1995; 20(4):151-4. PubMed ID: 8700783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Double-blind randomized clinical trial of posterior composite restorations with or without bevel: 6-month follow-up.
Coelho-de-Souza FH; Klein-Júnior CA; Camargo JC; Beskow T; Balestrin MD; Demarco FF
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Mar; 11(2):001-8. PubMed ID: 20228981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Managing stress with composite resin, Part 1: The restorative-tooth interface.
Terry DA; Leinfelder KF
Dent Today; 2006 Dec; 25(12):98, 100-4; quiz 104. PubMed ID: 17193798
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Effect of different modes of light curing and resin composites on microleakage of Class II restorations.
Hardan LS; Amm EW; Ghayad A
Odontostomatol Trop; 2008 Dec; 31(124):27-34. PubMed ID: 19441264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Curing light intensity effects on wear resistance of two resin composites.
St-Georges AJ; Swift EJ; Thompson JY; Heymann HO
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):410-7. PubMed ID: 12120780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Direct resin composites for 2002 and beyond.
Small BW
Gen Dent; 2002; 50(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 12029793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials.
Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Droz D
J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18647507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design.
Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Commentary: effect of polishing direction on the marginal adaptation of composite resin restorations.
Wakefield C
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2013 Apr; 25(2):139-40. PubMed ID: 23617388
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Influence of volumetric shrinkage and curing light intensity on proximal contact tightness of class II resin composite restorations: in vitro study.
El-Shamy H; Saber MH; Dörfer CE; El-Badrawy W; Loomans BA
Oper Dent; 2012; 37(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 22313267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Class II glass ionomer cermet tunnel, resin sandwich and amalgam restorations over 2 years.
Wilkie R; Lidums A; Smales R
Am J Dent; 1993 Aug; 6(4):181-4. PubMed ID: 7803004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Microleakage reduction using glass-ceramic inserts.
Godder B; Zhukovsky L; Trushkowsky R; Epelboym D
Am J Dent; 1994 Apr; 7(2):74-6. PubMed ID: 8054188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. An alternative method to reduce polymerization shrinkage in direct posterior composite restorations.
Deliperi S; Bardwell DN
J Am Dent Assoc; 2002 Oct; 133(10):1387-98. PubMed ID: 12403542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Randomised trial of resin-based restorations in Class I and Class II beveled preparations in primary molars: 48-month results.
Alves dos Santos MP; Luiz RR; Maia LC
J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):451-9. PubMed ID: 20188783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Achieving form and function for Class II restorations using aesthetic resin stratification.
Shannon AT
Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 18(5):323-8. PubMed ID: 16903545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. SEM and microleakage evaluation of the marginal integrity of two types of class V restorations with or without the use of a light-curable coating material and of polishing.
Magni E; Zhang L; Hickel R; Bossù M; Polimeni A; Ferrari M
J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):885-91. PubMed ID: 18757129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Class II composite restorations with metallic and translucent matrices: 2-year follow-up findings.
Demarco FF; Cenci MS; Lima FG; Donassollo TA; André Dde A; Leida FL
J Dent; 2007 Mar; 35(3):231-7. PubMed ID: 17034926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Adhesion, layering, and finishing of resin composite restorations for class II cavity preparations.
Ferraris F
Eur J Esthet Dent; 2007; 2(2):210-21. PubMed ID: 19655566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Three-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance and wear of a nanocomposite versus a hybrid composite.
Palaniappan S; Bharadwaj D; Mattar DL; Peumans M; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P
Dent Mater; 2009 Nov; 25(11):1302-14. PubMed ID: 19577288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Nanohybrid composite vs. fine hybrid composite in extended class II cavities: clinical and microscopic results after 2 years.
Krämer N; Reinelt C; García-Godoy F; Taschner M; Petschelt A; Frankenberger R
Am J Dent; 2009 Aug; 22(4):228-34. PubMed ID: 19824560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
