These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20830892)

  • 41. Evaluation of proximal contacts of posterior composite restorations with 4 placement techniques.
    El-Badrawy WA; Leung BW; El-Mowafy O; Rubo JH; Rubo MH
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2003 Mar; 69(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 12622881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Effect of glass inserts on resin composite wear.
    Kawai K; Leinfelder KF
    Am J Dent; 1995 Oct; 8(5):249-52. PubMed ID: 8634161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. 36-month clinical evaluation of two adhesives and microhybrid resin composites in Class I restorations.
    Swift EJ; Ritter AV; Heymann HO; Sturdevant JR; Wilder AD
    Am J Dent; 2008 Jun; 21(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 18686764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Comparative study of composite resin placement: centripetal buildup versus incremental technique.
    Szep S; Frank H; Kenzel B; Gerhardt T; Heidemann D
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2001 Apr; 13(3):243-50; quiz 252. PubMed ID: 11360771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The effect of various placement techniques on the microhardness of Class II (slot) resin composite restorations.
    Moosavi H; Abedini S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Sep; 10(5):E009-16. PubMed ID: 19838605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Direct posterior composite restorations: simplified success through a systematic approach.
    Koczarski MJ; Corredor AC
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2002; 14(1):87-94; quiz 96. PubMed ID: 11905163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Contemporary restoration of Class II caries. Direct posterior composites.
    Abel MG
    Dent Today; 2002 Nov; 21(11):94-7. PubMed ID: 12483933
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Clinical results and new developments of direct posterior restorations.
    Hickel R; Manhart J; García-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):41D-54D. PubMed ID: 11763918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Two-year clinical evaluation of packable and nanostructured resin-based composites placed with two techniques.
    Monteiro PM; Manso MC; Gavinha S; Melo P
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2010 Mar; 141(3):319-29. PubMed ID: 20194388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Morphological analysis of proximal contacts in class II direct restorations with 3D image reconstruction.
    Chuang SF; Su KC; Wang CH; Chang CH
    J Dent; 2011 Jun; 39(6):448-56. PubMed ID: 21504778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Posterior resin composite restorations: a new technique.
    Baratieri LN; Monteiro Júnior S; Correa M; Ritter AV
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Nov; 27(11):733-8. PubMed ID: 9161264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Split increment horizontal layering: a simplified placement technique for direct posterior resin restorations.
    Hassan K; Khier S
    Gen Dent; 2005; 53(6):406-9. PubMed ID: 16366047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Marginal adaptation of heat-pressed glass-ceramic veneers to Class 3 composite restorations in vitro.
    Christgau M; Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Edelmann K
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(4):233-44. PubMed ID: 10823069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Radiographic assessments of Class II resin composite restorations in a clinical study: baseline results.
    Kreulen CM; van Amerongen WE; Akerboom HB; Borgmeijer PJ; Gruythuysen RJ
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1992; 59(2):97-107. PubMed ID: 1583203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Class II composite placement is difficult! Solutions to help overcome the clinical challenges.
    Goodchild JH
    Dent Today; 2013 Nov; 32(11):110, 112, 114, 116-7. PubMed ID: 24358548
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. In vitro marginal leakage around Class II resin composite restorations with glass-ceramic inserts.
    Coli P; Derhami K; Brännström M
    Quintessence Int; 1997 Nov; 28(11):755-60. PubMed ID: 9573868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 6-year results.
    Busato AL; Loguercio AD; Reis A; Carrilho MR
    Am J Dent; 2001 Oct; 14(5):304-8. PubMed ID: 11803995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Finishing and polishing criteria for minimally invasive composite restorations.
    LeSage B
    Gen Dent; 2011; 59(6):422-8; quiz 429-30. PubMed ID: 22313913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Teaching of direct posterior resin composite restorations in UK dental therapy training programmes.
    Lynch CD; Wilson NH
    Br Dent J; 2010 May; 208(9):415-21. PubMed ID: 20448613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Evaluation of proximal contact tightness of Class II resin composite restorations.
    Saber MH; Loomans BA; El Zohairy A; Dörfer CE; El-Badrawy W
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 20166409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.