These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20831240)

  • 1. Training a scoring function for the alignment of small molecules.
    Chan SL; Labute P
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Sep; 50(9):1724-35. PubMed ID: 20831240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A new protein binding pocket similarity measure based on comparison of clouds of atoms in 3D: application to ligand prediction.
    Hoffmann B; Zaslavskiy M; Vert JP; Stoven V
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Feb; 11():99. PubMed ID: 20175916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Small Step Toward Generalizability: Training a Machine Learning Scoring Function for Structure-Based Virtual Screening.
    Scantlebury J; Vost L; Carbery A; Hadfield TE; Turnbull OM; Brown N; Chenthamarakshan V; Das P; Grosjean H; von Delft F; Deane CM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2023 May; 63(10):2960-2974. PubMed ID: 37166179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. DrugScore(CSD)-knowledge-based scoring function derived from small molecule crystal data with superior recognition rate of near-native ligand poses and better affinity prediction.
    Velec HF; Gohlke H; Klebe G
    J Med Chem; 2005 Oct; 48(20):6296-303. PubMed ID: 16190756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computational fragment-based drug design to explore the hydrophobic sub-pocket of the mitotic kinesin Eg5 allosteric binding site.
    Oguievetskaia K; Martin-Chanas L; Vorotyntsev A; Doppelt-Azeroual O; Brotel X; Adcock SA; de Brevern AG; Delfaud F; Moriaud F
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2009 Aug; 23(8):571-82. PubMed ID: 19533373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comprehensive survey of small-molecule binding pockets in proteins.
    Gao M; Skolnick J
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2013 Oct; 9(10):e1003302. PubMed ID: 24204237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An electronic environment and contact direction sensitive scoring function for predicting affinities of protein-ligand complexes in Contour(®).
    Lindblom PR; Wu G; Liu Z; Jim KC; Baldwin JJ; Gregg RE; Claremon DA; Singh SB
    J Mol Graph Model; 2014 Sep; 53():118-127. PubMed ID: 25123650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction of the Favorable Hydration Sites in a Protein Binding Pocket and Its Application to Scoring Function Formulation.
    Li Y; Gao Y; Holloway MK; Wang R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Sep; 60(9):4359-4375. PubMed ID: 32401510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Machine learning in computational docking.
    Khamis MA; Gomaa W; Ahmed WF
    Artif Intell Med; 2015 Mar; 63(3):135-52. PubMed ID: 25724101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ligand-based pharmacophore detection, screening of potential gliptins and docking studies to get effective antidiabetic agents.
    Agrawal R; Jain P; Dikshit SN
    Comb Chem High Throughput Screen; 2012 Dec; 15(10):849-76. PubMed ID: 23140189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Crystal structure of a glutamate/aspartate binding protein complexed with a glutamate molecule: structural basis of ligand specificity at atomic resolution.
    Hu Y; Fan CP; Fu G; Zhu D; Jin Q; Wang DC
    J Mol Biol; 2008 Sep; 382(1):99-111. PubMed ID: 18640128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Learning from Docked Ligands: Ligand-Based Features Rescue Structure-Based Scoring Functions When Trained on Docked Poses.
    Boyles F; Deane CM; Morris GM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Nov; 62(22):5329-5341. PubMed ID: 34469150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development of pharmacophore similarity-based quantitative activity hypothesis and its applicability domain: applied on a diverse data-set of HIV-1 integrase inhibitors.
    Kumar SP; Jasrai YT; Mehta VP; Pandya HA
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2015; 33(4):706-22. PubMed ID: 24735019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Incremental window-based protein sequence alignment algorithms.
    Rangwala H; Karypis G
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Jan; 23(2):e17-23. PubMed ID: 17237087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. LS-align: an atom-level, flexible ligand structural alignment algorithm for high-throughput virtual screening.
    Hu J; Liu Z; Yu DJ; Zhang Y
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Jul; 34(13):2209-2218. PubMed ID: 29462237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Converging a Knowledge-Based Scoring Function: DrugScore
    Dittrich J; Schmidt D; Pfleger C; Gohlke H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Jan; 59(1):509-521. PubMed ID: 30513206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Constructing patch-based ligand-binding pocket database for predicting function of proteins.
    Sael L; Kihara D
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Mar; 13 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S7. PubMed ID: 22536870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of scoring functions for protein sequence profile alignment.
    Edgar RC; Sjölander K
    Bioinformatics; 2004 May; 20(8):1301-8. PubMed ID: 14962936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. FLAME: a program to flexibly align molecules.
    Cho SJ; Sun Y
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(1):298-306. PubMed ID: 16426065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. AIScore chemically diverse empirical scoring function employing quantum chemical binding energies of hydrogen-bonded complexes.
    Raub S; Steffen A; Kämper A; Marian CM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Jul; 48(7):1492-510. PubMed ID: 18597446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.