740 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20831289)
1. International comparison of comparative effectiveness research in five jurisdictions: insights for the US.
Levy AR; Mitton C; Johnston KM; Harrigan B; Briggs AH
Pharmacoeconomics; 2010; 28(10):813-30. PubMed ID: 20831289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Case Studies: Factors Influencing Divergent HTA Reimbursement Recommendations in Australia, Canada, England, and Scotland.
Allen N; Walker SR; Liberti L; Salek S
Value Health; 2017 Mar; 20(3):320-328. PubMed ID: 28292476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. HTA decision-making for drugs for rare diseases: comparison of processes across countries.
Stafinski T; Glennie J; Young A; Menon D
Orphanet J Rare Dis; 2022 Jul; 17(1):258. PubMed ID: 35804398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differences in Health Technology Assessment Recommendations Among European Jurisdictions: The Role of Practice Variations.
Vreman RA; Mantel-Teeuwisse AK; Hövels AM; Leufkens HGM; Goettsch WG
Value Health; 2020 Jan; 23(1):10-16. PubMed ID: 31952664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Methods for the comparative evaluation of pharmaceuticals.
Zentner A; Velasco-Garrido M; Busse R
GMS Health Technol Assess; 2005 Nov; 1():Doc09. PubMed ID: 21289930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Health technology assessment in Australia: a role for clinical registries?
Scott AM
Aust Health Rev; 2017 Mar; 41(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 27028134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Payer Perspectives on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Health Care Decision Making: Oncology Examples.
Brogan AP; DeMuro C; Barrett AM; D'Alessio D; Bal V; Hogue SL
J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2017 Feb; 23(2):125-134. PubMed ID: 28125369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Health technology assessment for cancer medicines across the G7 countries and Oceania: an international, cross-sectional study.
Jenei K; Raymakers AJN; Bayle A; Berger-Thürmel K; Cherla A; Honda K; Jackson CCGA; Karikios D; Trapani D; Berry S; Gyawali B
Lancet Oncol; 2023 Jun; 24(6):624-635. PubMed ID: 37269843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Determinants of Managed Entry Agreements in the context of Health Technology Assessment: a comparative analysis of oncology therapies in four countries.
Efthymiadou O; Kanavos P
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2021 Jan; 37():e31. PubMed ID: 33509311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Commonalities and differences in HTA outcomes: a comparative analysis of five countries and implications for coverage decisions.
Nicod E; Kanavos P
Health Policy; 2012 Dec; 108(2-3):167-77. PubMed ID: 23088802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Using effectiveness and cost-effectiveness to make drug coverage decisions: a comparison of Britain, Australia, and Canada.
Clement FM; Harris A; Li JJ; Yong K; Lee KM; Manns BJ
JAMA; 2009 Oct; 302(13):1437-43. PubMed ID: 19809025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Companies' Health Technology Assessment Strategies and Practices in Australia, Canada, England, France, Germany, Italy and Spain: An Industry Metrics Study.
Wang T; McAuslane N; Liberti L; Gardarsdottir H; Goettsch W; Leufkens H
Front Pharmacol; 2020; 11():594549. PubMed ID: 33390978
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.
Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S
Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Policies for Use of Real-World Data in Health Technology Assessment (HTA): A Comparative Study of Six HTA Agencies.
Makady A; Ham RT; de Boer A; Hillege H; Klungel O; Goettsch W;
Value Health; 2017 Apr; 20(4):520-532. PubMed ID: 28407993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Health technology assessment of medical devices: What is different? An overview of three European projects.
Schnell-Inderst P; Mayer J; Lauterberg J; Hunger T; Arvandi M; Conrads-Frank A; Nachtnebel A; Wild C; Siebert U
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2015; 109(4-5):309-18. PubMed ID: 26354131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Health benefit assessment of pharmaceuticals: An international comparison of decisions from Germany, England, Scotland and Australia.
Fischer KE; Heisser T; Stargardt T
Health Policy; 2016 Oct; 120(10):1115-1122. PubMed ID: 27628196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Health Technology Assessment in Australia: The Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee and Medical Services Advisory Committee.
Kim H; Byrnes J; Goodall S;
Value Health Reg Issues; 2021 May; 24():6-11. PubMed ID: 33429153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Harmonization of HTA--based reimbursement and regulatory approval activities: a qualitative study.
Tsoi B; O'Reilly D; Masucci L; Drummond M; Goeree R
J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol; 2015; 22(1):e78-89. PubMed ID: 25715384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
