These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20831303)

  • 21. Decomposition analysis as a framework for understanding heterogeneity of treatment effects in non-randomized health care studies.
    Crown WH
    Pharm Stat; 2021 Sep; 20(5):945-951. PubMed ID: 33724684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Targeted learning in real-world comparative effectiveness research with time-varying interventions.
    Neugebauer R; Schmittdiel JA; van der Laan MJ
    Stat Med; 2014 Jun; 33(14):2480-520. PubMed ID: 24535915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Confounder adjustment in observational comparative effectiveness researches: (2) statistical adjustment approaches for unmeasured confounders].
    Huang LL; Wei YY; Chen F
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Nov; 40(11):1450-1455. PubMed ID: 31838820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparative Effectiveness Study in Multiple Sclerosis Patients Using Instrumental Variable Analysis.
    Hosseini H; Mansournia MA; Nabavi SM; Akhlaghi AA; Gholami J; Mohammad K; Majdzadeh R
    Arch Iran Med; 2018 Aug; 21(8):368-375. PubMed ID: 30113859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Can we make smart choices between OLS and contaminated IV methods?
    Basu A; Chan KC
    Health Econ; 2014 Apr; 23(4):462-72. PubMed ID: 23765683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Practice-based evidence research in rehabilitation: an alternative to randomized controlled trials and traditional observational studies.
    Horn SD; DeJong G; Deutscher D
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Aug; 93(8 Suppl):S127-37. PubMed ID: 22840879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Can statistical linkage of missing variables reduce bias in treatment effect estimates in comparative effectiveness research studies?
    Crown W; Chang J; Olson M; Kahler K; Swindle J; Buzinec P; Shah N; Borah B
    J Comp Eff Res; 2015 Sep; 4(5):455-63. PubMed ID: 26436848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Estimating effects of nursing intervention via propensity score analysis.
    Qin R; Titler MG; Shever LL; Kim T
    Nurs Res; 2008; 57(6):444-52. PubMed ID: 19018219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The landscape of comparative effectiveness research in rheumatology.
    DeWitt EM; Brunner HI
    Nat Rev Rheumatol; 2014 Jan; 10(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 24061502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Distinguishing Selection Bias and Confounding Bias in Comparative Effectiveness Research.
    Haneuse S
    Med Care; 2016 Apr; 54(4):e23-9. PubMed ID: 24309675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Issues for covariance analysis of dichotomous and ordered categorical data from randomized clinical trials and non-parametric strategies for addressing them.
    Koch GG; Tangen CM; Jung JW; Amara IA
    Stat Med; 1998 Aug 15-30; 17(15-16):1863-92. PubMed ID: 9749453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparative effectiveness clinical trials to advance treatment of myasthenia gravis.
    Guptill JT; Raja S; Sanders DB; Narayanaswami P
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2018 Feb; 1413(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 29377158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The use of clinical trials in comparative effectiveness research on mental health.
    Blanco C; Rafful C; Olfson M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 66(8 Suppl):S29-36. PubMed ID: 23849150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Observational study designs for comparative effectiveness research: an alternative approach to close evidence gaps in head-and-neck cancer.
    Goulart BH; Ramsey SD; Parvathaneni U
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Jan; 88(1):106-14. PubMed ID: 24331656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparative effectiveness research in cancer with observational data.
    Giordano SH
    Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book; 2015; ():e330-5. PubMed ID: 25993193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Surgery for epilepsy.
    West S; Nevitt SJ; Cotton J; Gandhi S; Weston J; Sudan A; Ramirez R; Newton R
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 Jun; 6(6):CD010541. PubMed ID: 31237346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparative effectiveness research: opportunities in surgical oncology.
    Neuman HB; Greenberg CC
    Semin Radiat Oncol; 2014 Jan; 24(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 24314341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A tall order on a tight timeframe: stakeholder perspectives on comparative effectiveness research using electronic clinical data.
    Holve E; Lopez MH; Scott L; Segal C
    J Comp Eff Res; 2012 Sep; 1(5):441-51. PubMed ID: 24236421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. High-dimensional propensity score algorithm in comparative effectiveness research with time-varying interventions.
    Neugebauer R; Schmittdiel JA; Zhu Z; Rassen JA; Seeger JD; Schneeweiss S
    Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(5):753-81. PubMed ID: 25488047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The ISPOR Good Practices for Quality Improvement of Cost-Effectiveness Research Task Force Report.
    McGhan WF; Al M; Doshi JA; Kamae I; Marx SE; Rindress D
    Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1086-99. PubMed ID: 19744291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.