These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20831303)

  • 81. Observational studies of treatment effectiveness in neurology.
    Kalincik T; Roos I; Sharmin S
    Brain; 2023 Dec; 146(12):4799-4808. PubMed ID: 37587541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. Should researchers use single indicators, best indicators, or multiple indicators in structural equation models?
    Hayduk LA; Littvay L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Oct; 12():159. PubMed ID: 23088287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. Adaptive designs for comparative effectiveness research trials.
    Kairalla JA; Coffey CS; Thomann MA; Shorr RI; Muller KE
    Clin Res Regul Aff; 2015; 32(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 27773984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. Nonparametric Variable Selection for Predictive Models and Subpopulations in Clinical Trials.
    Zhu J; Xie J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(4):781-94. PubMed ID: 24905059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. On two-stage estimation of structural instrumental variable models.
    Choi BY; Fine JP; Brookhart MA
    Biometrika; 2017 Dec; 104(4):881-899. PubMed ID: 29430042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. HETEROGENEITY IN TREATMENT EFFECT AND COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH.
    Luo Z
    China Health Rev; 2011 Oct; 2(3):2-7. PubMed ID: 25364768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. Two-stage residual inclusion estimation: addressing endogeneity in health econometric modeling.
    Terza JV; Basu A; Rathouz PJ
    J Health Econ; 2008 May; 27(3):531-43. PubMed ID: 18192044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. Instrumental variable analyses. Exploiting natural randomness to understand causal mechanisms.
    Iwashyna TJ; Kennedy EH
    Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2013 Jun; 10(3):255-60. PubMed ID: 23802827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. Regression methods in the empiric analysis of health care data.
    Skrepnek GH
    J Manag Care Pharm; 2005 Apr; 11(3):240-51. PubMed ID: 15804208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. Using relative brain size as predictor variable: Serious pitfalls and solutions.
    Smeele SQ
    Ecol Evol; 2022 Sep; 12(9):e9273. PubMed ID: 36188504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. Statistical Power of Alternative Structural Models for Comparative Effectiveness Research: Advantages of Modeling Unreliability.
    Coman EN; Iordache E; Dierker L; Fifield J; Schensul JJ; Suggs S; Barbour R
    J Mod Appl Stat Methods; 2014 May; 13(1):71-90. PubMed ID: 26640421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. Local Effects of Intervention: a Configural Analysis.
    von Eye A; Wiedermann W; Herman KC; Reinke W
    Prev Sci; 2023 Apr; 24(3):419-430. PubMed ID: 33983557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. State of the art in selection of variables and functional forms in multivariable analysis-outstanding issues.
    Sauerbrei W; Perperoglou A; Schmid M; Abrahamowicz M; Becher H; Binder H; Dunkler D; Harrell FE; Royston P; Heinze G;
    Diagn Progn Res; 2020; 4():3. PubMed ID: 32266321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. Instrumental variable estimation for functional concurrent regression models.
    Petrovich J; Taoufik B; Davis ZG
    J Appl Stat; 2024; 51(8):1570-1589. PubMed ID: 38863803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. Composite variables: when and how.
    Song MK; Lin FC; Ward SE; Fine JP
    Nurs Res; 2013; 62(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 23114795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. Tenets of Good Practice in Regression Analysis. A Brief Tutorial.
    Pisică D; Dammers R; Boersma E; Volovici V
    World Neurosurg; 2022 May; 161():230-239.e6. PubMed ID: 35505539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. Basic Statistics for Surgeons.
    Xu J; An VVG; Sivakumar BS
    J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol; 2022 Jun; 27(3):421-429. PubMed ID: 35808879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. Potential Bias of Instrumental Variable Analysis in Comparative Effectiveness Research for Bariatric Surgery.
    Garabedian LF
    JAMA Netw Open; 2022 Aug; 5(8):e2225970. PubMed ID: 35980642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. Model Misinterpretation within Biology: Phenotypes, Statistics, Networks, and Inference.
    Kliebenstein DJ
    Front Plant Sci; 2012; 3():13. PubMed ID: 22645568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. Improving Registry-Based Observational Comparative Effectiveness Studies by Prospectively Incorporating Robust Treatment Preference Instruments.
    Redfors B
    JACC Adv; 2023 Jul; 2(5):100413. PubMed ID: 38939014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.