147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20831487)
1. Feasibility and sensitivity study of helical tomotherapy for dose painting plans.
Deveau MA; Bowen SR; Westerly DC; Jeraj R
Acta Oncol; 2010 Oct; 49(7):991-6. PubMed ID: 20831487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Feasibility of dose painting using volumetric modulated arc optimization and delivery.
Korreman SS; Ulrich S; Bowen S; Deveau M; Bentzen SM; Jeraj R
Acta Oncol; 2010 Oct; 49(7):964-71. PubMed ID: 20831483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dose painting based on tumor uptake of Cu-ATSM and FDG: a comparative study.
Clausen MM; Hansen AE; Lundemann M; Hollensen C; Pommer T; Munck Af Rosenschöld P; Kristensen AT; Kjær A; McEvoy FJ; Engelholm SA
Radiat Oncol; 2014 Oct; 9():228. PubMed ID: 25319766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Feasibility and robustness of dose painting by numbers in proton therapy with contour-driven plan optimization.
Barragán AM; Differding S; Janssens G; Lee JA; Sterpin E
Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):2006-17. PubMed ID: 25832091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Investigation of pitch and jaw width to decrease delivery time of helical tomotherapy treatments for head and neck cancer.
Moldovan M; Fontenot JD; Gibbons JP; Lee TK; Rosen II; Fields RS; Hogstrom KR
Med Dosim; 2011; 36(4):397-403. PubMed ID: 21377865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiation dose escalation based on FDG-PET driven dose painting by numbers in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a dosimetric comparison between TomoTherapy-HA and RapidArc.
Differding S; Sterpin E; Hermand N; Vanstraelen B; Nuyts S; de Patoul N; Denis JM; Lee JA; Grégoire V
Radiat Oncol; 2017 Mar; 12(1):59. PubMed ID: 28335778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of treatment planning parameters for dose painting head and neck plans delivered with tomotherapy.
Skórska M; Piotrowski T; Ryczkowski A; Kaźmierska J
Br J Radiol; 2016; 89(1060):20150970. PubMed ID: 26828971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dosimetric and radiobiological comparison of helical tomotherapy, forward-planned intensity-modulated radiotherapy and two-phase conformal plans for radical radiotherapy treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas.
Chatterjee S; Willis N; Locks SM; Mott JH; Kelly CG
Br J Radiol; 2011 Dec; 84(1008):1083-90. PubMed ID: 22101580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Methodology for adaptive and robust FDG-PET escalated dose painting by numbers in head and neck tumors.
Differding S; Sterpin E; Janssens G; Hanin FX; Lee JA; Grégoire V
Acta Oncol; 2016; 55(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 26079436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intensity modulated arc therapy implementation in a three phase adaptive (18)F-FDG-PET voxel intensity-based planning strategy for head-and-neck cancer.
Berwouts D; Olteanu LA; Speleers B; Duprez F; Madani I; Vercauteren T; De Neve W; De Gersem W
Radiat Oncol; 2016 Apr; 11():52. PubMed ID: 27039294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A novel approach to overcome hypoxic tumor resistance: Cu-ATSM-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Chao KS; Bosch WR; Mutic S; Lewis JS; Dehdashti F; Mintun MA; Dempsey JF; Perez CA; Purdy JA; Welch MJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Mar; 49(4):1171-82. PubMed ID: 11240261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Helical tomotherapy to LINAC plan conversion utilizing RayStation Fallback planning.
Zhang X; Penagaricano J; Narayanasamy G; Corry P; Liu T; Sanjay M; Paudel N; Morrill S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):178-185. PubMed ID: 28291935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Expected clinical impact of the differences between planned and delivered dose distributions in helical tomotherapy for treating head and neck cancer using helical megavoltage CT images.
Mavroidis P; Stathakis S; Gutierrez A; Esquivel C; Shi C; Papanikolaou N
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 10(3):125-139. PubMed ID: 19692977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A study of IMRT planning parameters on planning efficiency, delivery efficiency, and plan quality.
Mittauer K; Lu B; Yan G; Kahler D; Gopal A; Amdur R; Liu C
Med Phys; 2013 Jun; 40(6):061704. PubMed ID: 23718583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hypoxia-targeted radiotherapy dose painting for head and neck cancer using (18)F-FMISO PET: a biological modeling study.
Chang JH; Wada M; Anderson NJ; Lim Joon D; Lee ST; Gong SJ; Gunawardana DH; Sachinidis J; O'Keefe G; Gan HK; Khoo V; Scott AM
Acta Oncol; 2013 Nov; 52(8):1723-9. PubMed ID: 23317145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of linac based fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy and tomotherapy treatment plans for skull-base tumors.
Soisson ET; Tomé WA; Richards GM; Mehta MP
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Mar; 78(3):313-21. PubMed ID: 16490269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prescribing and evaluating target dose in dose-painting treatment plans.
Håkansson K; Specht L; Aznar MC; Rasmussen JH; Bentzen SM; Vogelius IR
Acta Oncol; 2014 Sep; 53(9):1251-6. PubMed ID: 24914483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adaptive dose painting by numbers for head-and-neck cancer.
Duprez F; De Neve W; De Gersem W; Coghe M; Madani I
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Jul; 80(4):1045-55. PubMed ID: 20643512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Helical tomotherapy planning for left-sided breast cancer patients with positive lymph nodes: comparison to conventional multiport breast technique.
Goddu SM; Chaudhari S; Mamalui-Hunter M; Pechenaya OL; Pratt D; Mutic S; Zoberi I; Jeswani S; Powell SN; Low DA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Mar; 73(4):1243-51. PubMed ID: 19251096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
