227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20831804)
1. Identification of response-modulated genetic interactions by sensitivity-based epistatic analysis.
Batenchuk C; Tepliakova L; Kaern M
BMC Genomics; 2010 Sep; 11():493. PubMed ID: 20831804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Epistatic interaction maps relative to multiple metabolic phenotypes.
Snitkin ES; Segrè D
PLoS Genet; 2011 Feb; 7(2):e1001294. PubMed ID: 21347328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prevalent positive epistasis in Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolic networks.
He X; Qian W; Wang Z; Li Y; Zhang J
Nat Genet; 2010 Mar; 42(3):272-6. PubMed ID: 20101242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modular epistasis and the compensatory evolution of gene deletion mutants.
Rojas Echenique JI; Kryazhimskiy S; Nguyen Ba AN; Desai MM
PLoS Genet; 2019 Feb; 15(2):e1007958. PubMed ID: 30768593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Abundant gene-by-environment interactions in gene expression reaction norms to copper within Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Hodgins-Davis A; Adomas AB; Warringer J; Townsend JP
Genome Biol Evol; 2012; 4(11):1061-79. PubMed ID: 23019066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rewiring of genetic networks in response to DNA damage.
Bandyopadhyay S; Mehta M; Kuo D; Sung MK; Chuang R; Jaehnig EJ; Bodenmiller B; Licon K; Copeland W; Shales M; Fiedler D; Dutkowski J; Guénolé A; van Attikum H; Shokat KM; Kolodner RD; Huh WK; Aebersold R; Keogh MC; Krogan NJ; Ideker T
Science; 2010 Dec; 330(6009):1385-9. PubMed ID: 21127252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Chemical-genetic approaches for exploring the mode of action of natural products.
Lopez A; Parsons AB; Nislow C; Giaever G; Boone C
Prog Drug Res; 2008; 66():237, 239-71. PubMed ID: 18416308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Recursive expectation-maximization clustering: a method for identifying buffering mechanisms composed of phenomic modules.
Guo J; Tian D; McKinney BA; Hartman JL
Chaos; 2010 Jun; 20(2):026103. PubMed ID: 20590332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analyzing the dose-dependence of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae global transcriptional response to methyl methanesulfonate and ionizing radiation.
Benton MG; Somasundaram S; Glasner JD; Palecek SP
BMC Genomics; 2006 Dec; 7():305. PubMed ID: 17140446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genetics. The DNA damage road map.
Friedman N; Schuldiner M
Science; 2010 Dec; 330(6009):1327-8. PubMed ID: 21127235
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Array-based synthetic genetic screens to map bacterial pathways and functional networks in Escherichia coli.
Babu M; Gagarinova A; Emili A
Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 781():99-126. PubMed ID: 21877280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Linking high-resolution metabolic flux phenotypes and transcriptional regulation in yeast modulated by the global regulator Gcn4p.
Moxley JF; Jewett MC; Antoniewicz MR; Villas-Boas SG; Alper H; Wheeler RT; Tong L; Hinnebusch AG; Ideker T; Nielsen J; Stephanopoulos G
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2009 Apr; 106(16):6477-82. PubMed ID: 19346491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robustness and evolvability in natural chemical resistance: identification of novel systems properties, biochemical mechanisms and regulatory interactions.
Venancio TM; Balaji S; Geetha S; Aravind L
Mol Biosyst; 2010 Aug; 6(8):1475-91. PubMed ID: 20517567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Trigenic Synthetic Genetic Array (τ-SGA) Technique for Complex Interaction Analysis.
Kuzmin E; Andrews BJ; Boone C
Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2212():377-400. PubMed ID: 33733368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Epistatic relationships reveal the functional organization of yeast transcription factors.
Zheng J; Benschop JJ; Shales M; Kemmeren P; Greenblatt J; Cagney G; Holstege F; Li H; Krogan NJ
Mol Syst Biol; 2010 Oct; 6():420. PubMed ID: 20959818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. UBC13, a DNA-damage-inducible gene, is a member of the error-free postreplication repair pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Brusky J; Zhu Y; Xiao W
Curr Genet; 2000 Mar; 37(3):168-74. PubMed ID: 10794173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Conditional genetic interactions of RTT107, SLX4, and HRQ1 reveal dynamic networks upon DNA damage in S. cerevisiae.
Leung GP; Aristizabal MJ; Krogan NJ; Kobor MS
G3 (Bethesda); 2014 Apr; 4(6):1059-69. PubMed ID: 24700328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Variance in epistasis links gene regulation and evolutionary rate in the yeast genetic interaction network.
Fierst JL; Phillips PC
Genome Biol Evol; 2012; 4(11):1080-7. PubMed ID: 23019067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Widespread Genetic Incompatibilities between First-Step Mutations during Parallel Adaptation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to a Common Environment.
Ono J; Gerstein AC; Otto SP
PLoS Biol; 2017 Jan; 15(1):e1002591. PubMed ID: 28114370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Refining current knowledge on the yeast FLR1 regulatory network by combined experimental and computational approaches.
Teixeira MC; Dias PJ; Monteiro PT; Sala A; Oliveira AL; Freitas AT; Sá-Correia I
Mol Biosyst; 2010 Dec; 6(12):2471-81. PubMed ID: 20938527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
