These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20831863)

  • 1. The phonemic restoration effect reveals pre-N400 effect of supportive sentence context in speech perception.
    Groppe DM; Choi M; Huang T; Schilz J; Topkins B; Urbach TP; Kutas M
    Brain Res; 2010 Nov; 1361():54-66. PubMed ID: 20831863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Phonemic restoration in a sentence context: evidence from early and late ERP effects.
    Sivonen P; Maess B; Lattner S; Friederici AD
    Brain Res; 2006 Nov; 1121(1):177-89. PubMed ID: 17027933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual information constrains early and late stages of spoken-word recognition in sentence context.
    Brunellière A; Sánchez-García C; Ikumi N; Soto-Faraco S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):136-47. PubMed ID: 23797145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Semantic retrieval of spoken words with an obliterated initial phoneme in a sentence context.
    Sivonen P; Maess B; Friederici AD
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Nov; 408(3):220-5. PubMed ID: 17005322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Phonemic restoration: insights from a new methodology.
    Samuel AG
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1981 Dec; 110(4):474-94. PubMed ID: 6459403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceptual restoration of a "missing" speech sound: auditory induction or illusion?
    Repp BH
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 Jan; 51(1):14-32. PubMed ID: 1549420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How and when accentuation influences temporally selective attention and subsequent semantic processing during on-line spoken language comprehension: an ERP study.
    Li XQ; Ren GQ
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jul; 50(8):1882-94. PubMed ID: 22564478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cross-modal phonetic encoding facilitates the McGurk illusion and phonemic restoration.
    Abbott NT; Shahin AJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2018 Dec; 120(6):2988-3000. PubMed ID: 30303762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrophysiological and phonological change detection measures of auditory word processing in normal Persian-speaking children.
    Ziatabar Ahmadi SZ; Mahmoudian S; Ashayeri H; Allaeddini F; Farhadi M
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Nov; 90():220-226. PubMed ID: 27729137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of semantic and syntactic context constraints on lexical selection and integration in spoken-word comprehension as revealed by ERPs.
    van den Brink D; Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004; 16(6):1068-84. PubMed ID: 15298793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Narrowed expectancies under degraded speech: revisiting the N400.
    Strauß A; Kotz SA; Obleser J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2013 Aug; 25(8):1383-95. PubMed ID: 23489145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attention within auditory word perception: insights from the phonemic restoration illusion.
    Samuel AG; Ressler WH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1986 Feb; 12(1):70-9. PubMed ID: 2939193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How long-term memory and accentuation interact during spoken language comprehension.
    Li X; Yang Y
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Apr; 51(5):967-78. PubMed ID: 23376769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lexical competition in nonnative speech comprehension.
    FitzPatrick I; Indefrey P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Jun; 22(6):1165-78. PubMed ID: 19583470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The redundancy of phonemes in sentential context.
    Stilp CE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):EL323-8. PubMed ID: 22088035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neural Mechanisms Underlying Cross-Modal Phonetic Encoding.
    Shahin AJ; Backer KC; Rosenblum LD; Kerlin JR
    J Neurosci; 2018 Feb; 38(7):1835-1849. PubMed ID: 29263241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of phonological and semantic features of sentence-ending words on visual event-related brain potentials.
    Connolly JF; Phillips NA; Forbes KA
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1995 Apr; 94(4):276-87. PubMed ID: 7537200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of processing requirements on neurophysiological responses to spoken sentences.
    Connolly JF; Stewart SH; Phillips NA
    Brain Lang; 1990 Aug; 39(2):302-18. PubMed ID: 2224497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Revisiting the incremental effects of context on word processing: Evidence from single-word event-related brain potentials.
    Payne BR; Lee CL; Federmeier KD
    Psychophysiology; 2015 Nov; 52(11):1456-69. PubMed ID: 26311477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interplay between acoustic/phonetic and semantic processes during spoken sentence comprehension: an ERP study.
    Boulenger V; Hoen M; Jacquier C; Meunier F
    Brain Lang; 2011 Feb; 116(2):51-63. PubMed ID: 20965558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.