115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20832007)
1. Improving the performance of direct Monte Carlo optimization for large tumor volumes.
Alvarez-Moret J; Dirscherl T; Rickhey M; Bogner L
Z Med Phys; 2010; 20(3):197-205. PubMed ID: 20832007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Simultaneous beam geometry and intensity map optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Lee EK; Fox T; Crocker I
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jan; 64(1):301-20. PubMed ID: 16289912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fast direct Monte Carlo optimization using the inverse kernel approach.
Bogner L; Alt M; Dirscherl T; Morgenstern I; Latscha C; Rickhey M
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jul; 54(13):4051-67. PubMed ID: 19502701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Advantage of biological over physical optimization in prostate cancer?
Dirscherl T; Alvarez-Moret J; Bogner L
Z Med Phys; 2011 Sep; 21(3):228-35. PubMed ID: 21530201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Advanced kernel methods vs. Monte Carlo-based dose calculation for high energy photon beams.
Fotina I; Winkler P; Künzler T; Reiterer J; Simmat I; Georg D
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Dec; 93(3):645-53. PubMed ID: 19926153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Head-and-neck IMRT treatments assessed with a Monte Carlo dose calculation engine.
Seco J; Adams E; Bidmead M; Partridge M; Verhaegen F
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):817-30. PubMed ID: 15798257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Monte Carlo-based procedure for independent monitor unit calculation in IMRT treatment plans.
Pisaturo O; Moeckli R; Mirimanoff RO; Bochud FO
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jul; 54(13):4299-310. PubMed ID: 19531844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development of methods for beam angle optimization for IMRT using an accelerated exhaustive search strategy.
Wang X; Zhang X; Dong L; Liu H; Wu Q; Mohan R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Nov; 60(4):1325-37. PubMed ID: 15519806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Monte Carlo evaluation of RapidArc oropharynx treatment planning strategies for sparing of midline structures.
Bush K; Zavgorodni S; Gagne I; Townson R; Ansbacher W; Beckham W
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4465-79. PubMed ID: 20668338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Volumetric modulated arc therapy: planning and evaluation for prostate cancer cases.
Zhang P; Happersett L; Hunt M; Jackson A; Zelefsky M; Mageras G
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 Apr; 76(5):1456-62. PubMed ID: 19540062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dose verification of an IMRT treatment planning system with the BEAM EGS4-based Monte Carlo code.
Francescon P; Cora S; Chiovati P
Med Phys; 2003 Feb; 30(2):144-57. PubMed ID: 12607832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Forward treatment planning for modulated electron radiotherapy (MERT) employing Monte Carlo methods.
Henzen D; Manser P; Frei D; Volken W; Neuenschwander H; Born EJ; Lössl K; Aebersold DM; Stampanoni MF; Fix MK
Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031712. PubMed ID: 24593716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sweeping-window arc therapy: an implementation of rotational IMRT with automatic beam-weight calculation.
Cameron C
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(18):4317-36. PubMed ID: 16148396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of IMRT planning with two-step and one-step optimization: a strategy for improving therapeutic gain and reducing the integral dose.
Abate A; Pressello MC; Benassi M; Strigari L
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Dec; 54(23):7183-98. PubMed ID: 19920309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Beam's-eye-view Dosimetrics-guided inverse planning for aperture-modulated arc therapy.
Ma Y; Popple R; Suh TS; Xing L
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Dec; 75(5):1587-95. PubMed ID: 19733446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of direct machine parameter optimization versus fluence optimization with sequential sequencing in IMRT of hypopharyngeal carcinoma.
Dobler B; Pohl F; Bogner L; Koelbl O
Radiat Oncol; 2007 Sep; 2():33. PubMed ID: 17822529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Incorporating geometric ray tracing to generate initial conditions for intensity modulated arc therapy optimization.
Oliver M; Gladwish A; Craig J; Chen J; Wong E
Med Phys; 2008 Jul; 35(7):3137-50. PubMed ID: 18697539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stochastic versus deterministic kernel-based superposition approaches for dose calculation of intensity-modulated arcs.
Tang G; Earl MA; Luan S; Wang C; Cao D; Yu CX; Naqvi SA
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4733-46. PubMed ID: 18701770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Toward a web-based real-time radiation treatment planning system in a cloud computing environment.
Na YH; Suh TS; Kapp DS; Xing L
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Sep; 58(18):6525-40. PubMed ID: 24002571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
