These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20832060)

  • 21. Neural predictors of auditory word learning.
    Mei L; Chen C; Xue G; He Q; Li T; Xue F; Yang Q; Dong Q
    Neuroreport; 2008 Jan; 19(2):215-9. PubMed ID: 18185111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Does grammar constrain statistical learning? Commentary on Bonatti, Peña, Nespor, and Mehler (2005).
    Keidel JL; Jenison RL; Kluender KR; Seidenberg MS
    Psychol Sci; 2007 Oct; 18(10):922-3. PubMed ID: 17894611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The statistical signature of morphosyntax: a study of Hungarian and Italian infant-directed speech.
    Gervain J; Guevara Erra R
    Cognition; 2012 Nov; 125(2):263-87. PubMed ID: 22874070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Co-occurrence statistics as a language-dependent cue for speech segmentation.
    Saksida A; Langus A; Nespor M
    Dev Sci; 2017 May; 20(3):. PubMed ID: 27146310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Invariance detection within an interactive system: a perceptual gateway to language development.
    Gogate LJ; Hollich G
    Psychol Rev; 2010 Apr; 117(2):496-516. PubMed ID: 20438235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Familiar units prevail over statistical cues in word segmentation.
    Poulin-Charronnat B; Perruchet P; Tillmann B; Peereman R
    Psychol Res; 2017 Sep; 81(5):990-1003. PubMed ID: 27580733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Signal-driven computations in speech processing.
    Peña M; Bonatti LL; Nespor M; Mehler J
    Science; 2002 Oct; 298(5593):604-7. PubMed ID: 12202684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Do current connectionist learning models account for reading development in different languages?
    Hutzler F; Ziegler JC; Perry C; Wimmer H; Zorzi M
    Cognition; 2004 Apr; 91(3):273-96. PubMed ID: 15168898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. New names for known things: on the association of novel word forms with existing semantic information.
    Dobel C; Junghöfer M; Breitenstein C; Klauke B; Knecht S; Pantev C; Zwitserlood P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Jun; 22(6):1251-61. PubMed ID: 19583468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. On consonants, vowels, chickens, and eggs.
    Bonatti LL; Peña M; Nespor M; Mehler J
    Psychol Sci; 2007 Oct; 18(10):924-5. PubMed ID: 17894612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Neural network processing of natural language: II. Towards a unified model of corticostriatal function in learning sentence comprehension and non-linguistic sequencing.
    Dominey PF; Inui T; Hoen M
    Brain Lang; 2009; 109(2-3):80-92. PubMed ID: 18835637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Influences on infant speech processing: toward a new synthesis.
    Werker JF; Tees RC
    Annu Rev Psychol; 1999; 50():509-35. PubMed ID: 10074686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. British English infants segment words only with exaggerated infant-directed speech stimuli.
    Floccia C; Keren-Portnoy T; DePaolis R; Duffy H; Delle Luche C; Durrant S; White L; Goslin J; Vihman M
    Cognition; 2016 Mar; 148():1-9. PubMed ID: 26707426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Infants listen for more phonetic detail in speech perception than in word-learning tasks.
    Stager CL; Werker JF
    Nature; 1997 Jul; 388(6640):381-2. PubMed ID: 9237755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Does morphological complexity affect word segmentation? Evidence from computational modeling.
    Loukatou G; Stoll S; Blasi D; Cristia A
    Cognition; 2022 Mar; 220():104960. PubMed ID: 34920298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Maturing brain mechanisms and developing behavioral language skills.
    Friedrich M; Friederici AD
    Brain Lang; 2010 Aug; 114(2):66-71. PubMed ID: 19665783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Learning diphone-based segmentation.
    Daland R; Pierrehumbert JB
    Cogn Sci; 2011; 35(1):119-55. PubMed ID: 21428994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. On-line Assessment of Statistical Learning by Event-related Potentials.
    Abla D; Katahira K; Okanoya K
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jun; 20(6):952-64. PubMed ID: 18211232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Rapid Statistical Learning Supporting Word Extraction From Continuous Speech.
    Batterink LJ
    Psychol Sci; 2017 Jul; 28(7):921-928. PubMed ID: 28493810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.