These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20832850)

  • 1. Polymerization stress, shrinkage and elastic modulus of current low-shrinkage restorative composites.
    Boaro LC; Gonçalves F; Guimarães TC; Ferracane JL; Versluis A; Braga RR
    Dent Mater; 2010 Dec; 26(12):1144-50. PubMed ID: 20832850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of shrinkage strain, modulus, and instrument compliance on polymerization shrinkage stress of light-cured composites during the initial curing stage.
    Min SH; Ferracane J; Lee IB
    Dent Mater; 2010 Oct; 26(10):1024-33. PubMed ID: 20684977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Polymerization characteristics, flexural modulus and microleakage evaluation of silorane-based and methacrylate-based composites.
    Gao BT; Lin H; Han JM; Zheng G
    Am J Dent; 2011 Apr; 24(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 21698989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Polymerization profile analysis of resin composite dental restorative materials in real time.
    Naoum SJ; Ellakwa A; Morgan L; White K; Martin FE; Lee IB
    J Dent; 2012 Jan; 40(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 22044773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Factors influencing marginal cavity adaptation of nanofiller containing resin composite restorations.
    Takahashi H; Finger WJ; Wegner K; Utterodt A; Komatsu M; Wöstmann B; Balkenhol M
    Dent Mater; 2010 Dec; 26(12):1166-75. PubMed ID: 20884047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Post-gel polymerization contraction of "low shrinkage" composite restoratives.
    Yap AU; Soh MS
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):182-7. PubMed ID: 15088730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do low-shrink composites reduce polymerization shrinkage effects?
    Tantbirojn D; Pfeifer CS; Braga RR; Versluis A
    J Dent Res; 2011 May; 90(5):596-601. PubMed ID: 21282725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of dental restorative composites containing polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane methacrylate.
    Fong H; Dickens SH; Flaim GM
    Dent Mater; 2005 Jun; 21(6):520-9. PubMed ID: 15904694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Investigations on a methacrylate-based flowable composite based on the SDR™ technology.
    Ilie N; Hickel R
    Dent Mater; 2011 Apr; 27(4):348-55. PubMed ID: 21194743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of stepped light exposure on the volumetric polymerization shrinkage and bulk modulus of dental composites and an unfilled resin.
    Price RB; Rizkalla AS; Hall GC
    Am J Dent; 2000 Aug; 13(4):176-80. PubMed ID: 11763926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A review of polymerization shrinkage stress: current techniques for posterior direct resin restorations.
    Giachetti L; Scaminaci Russo D; Bambi C; Grandini R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Sep; 7(4):79-88. PubMed ID: 16957794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contraction stress, elastic modulus, and degree of conversion of three flowable composites.
    Cadenaro M; Codan B; Navarra CO; Marchesi G; Turco G; Di Lenarda R; Breschi L
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2011 Jun; 119(3):241-5. PubMed ID: 21564319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contraction stress related to composite inorganic content.
    Gonçalves F; Kawano Y; Braga RR
    Dent Mater; 2010 Jul; 26(7):704-9. PubMed ID: 20378161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of micro-tensile bond strengths of composite materials in comparison to their polymerization shrinkage.
    Ilie N; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R
    Dent Mater; 2006 Jul; 22(7):593-601. PubMed ID: 16289723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fast curing of restorative materials through the soft light energy release.
    De Santis R; Gloria A; Prisco D; Amendola E; Puppulin L; Pezzotti G; Rengo S; Ambrosio L; Nicolais L
    Dent Mater; 2010 Sep; 26(9):891-900. PubMed ID: 20554315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Investigating filler morphology and mechanical properties of new low-shrinkage resin composite types.
    Leprince J; Palin WM; Mullier T; Devaux J; Vreven J; Leloup G
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 May; 37(5):364-76. PubMed ID: 20202096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contraction stress of low-shrinkage composite materials assessed with different testing systems.
    Marchesi G; Breschi L; Antoniolli F; Di Lenarda R; Ferracane J; Cadenaro M
    Dent Mater; 2010 Oct; 26(10):947-53. PubMed ID: 20566212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of interfacial bond quality on the direction of polymerization shrinkage flow in resin composite restorations.
    Cho BH; Dickens SH; Bae JH; Chang CG; Son HH; Um CM
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 12022463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Organosilicon dental composite restoratives based on 1,3-bis[(p-acryloxymethyl) phenethyl] tetramethyldisiloxane.
    Lai JH; Johnson AE; Douglas RB
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jul; 20(6):570-8. PubMed ID: 15134945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of low-elastic modulus liner and base as stress-absorbing layer in composite resin restorations.
    Oliveira LC; Duarte S; Araujo CA; Abrahão A
    Dent Mater; 2010 Mar; 26(3):e159-69. PubMed ID: 20031198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.