These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20833104)

  • 41. Clinician reports of the impact of electronic ordering on an emergency department.
    Georgiou A; Westbrook JI
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2009; 150():678-82. PubMed ID: 19745397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. What can IT do for you?
    Solovy A
    Trustee; 2005 Oct; 58(9):42-4. PubMed ID: 16317881
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Medication Administration Time Study (MATS): nursing staff performance of medication administration.
    Elganzouri ES; Standish CA; Androwich I
    J Nurs Adm; 2009 May; 39(5):204-10. PubMed ID: 19423985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Preprinted order sets as a safety intervention in pediatric sedation.
    Broussard M; Bass PF; Arnold CL; McLarty JW; Bocchini JA
    J Pediatr; 2009 Jun; 154(6):865-8. PubMed ID: 19181332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Turnaround time and transaction costs.
    Viccellio P
    Ann Emerg Med; 2008 Feb; 51(2):186-7. PubMed ID: 17719694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Using a low-cost simulation approach for assessing the impact of a medication administration system on workflow.
    Kushniruk AW; Borycki EM; Kuwata S; Watanabe H
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 136():567-72. PubMed ID: 18487791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Prevention of pediatric medication errors by hospital pharmacists and the potential benefit of computerized physician order entry.
    Wang JK; Herzog NS; Kaushal R; Park C; Mochizuki C; Weingarten SR
    Pediatrics; 2007 Jan; 119(1):e77-85. PubMed ID: 17200262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The role of computerized order sets in pediatric inpatient asthma treatment.
    Chisolm DJ; McAlearney AS; Veneris S; Fisher D; Holtzlander M; McCoy KS
    Pediatr Allergy Immunol; 2006 May; 17(3):199-206. PubMed ID: 16672007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Finding the ROI in EMRs.
    Thompson DI; Fleming NS
    Healthc Financ Manage; 2008 Jul; 62(7):76-81. PubMed ID: 18683417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Evaluating the implementation and use of a computerized physician order entry system: a case study.
    La Cour V; Hellstern-Hauerslev C
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2007; 130():75-9. PubMed ID: 17917182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comparison of direct and indirect nursing-care times between physician order entry system and electronic medical records.
    Choi WH; Park IS; Shin HJ; Joo YH; Kim YA; Jung EH; Kang MJ
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 122():288-93. PubMed ID: 17102266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Showing them evidence.
    Hagland M
    Healthc Inform; 2011 Jun; 28(6):54-5. PubMed ID: 21736213
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Impact of computerised physician order entry (CPOE) on the incidence of chemotherapy-related medication errors: a systematic review.
    Srinivasamurthy SK; Ashokkumar R; Kodidela S; Howard SC; Samer CF; Chakradhara Rao US
    Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 2021 Aug; 77(8):1123-1131. PubMed ID: 33624119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Evaluating hospital information system according to ISO 9241 part 12.
    Montazeri M; Khajouei R; Montazeri M
    Digit Health; 2020; 6():2055207620979466. PubMed ID: 33354336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Risk factors associated with medication ordering errors.
    Abraham J; Galanter WL; Touchette D; Xia Y; Holzer KJ; Leung V; Kannampallil T
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2021 Jan; 28(1):86-94. PubMed ID: 33221852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Defining electronic-prescribing and infusion-related medication errors in paediatric intensive care - a Delphi study.
    Howlett MM; Cleary BJ; Breatnach CV
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2018 Dec; 18(1):130. PubMed ID: 30526623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Evidence-based usability design principles for medication alerting systems.
    Marcilly R; Ammenwerth E; Roehrer E; Niès J; Beuscart-Zéphir MC
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2018 Jul; 18(1):69. PubMed ID: 30041647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Comparison of heuristic and cognitive walkthrough usability evaluation methods for evaluating health information systems.
    Khajouei R; Zahiri Esfahani M; Jahani Y
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2017 Apr; 24(e1):e55-e60. PubMed ID: 27497799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. An appraisal of published usability evaluations of electronic health records via systematic review.
    Ellsworth MA; Dziadzko M; O'Horo JC; Farrell AM; Zhang J; Herasevich V
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2017 Jan; 24(1):218-226. PubMed ID: 27107451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. User Interface Problems of a Nationwide Inpatient Information System: A Heuristic Evaluation.
    Atashi A; Khajouei R; Azizi A; Dadashi A
    Appl Clin Inform; 2016; 7(1):89-100. PubMed ID: 27081409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.