These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20833845)
1. US of breast masses categorized as BI-RADS 3, 4, and 5: pictorial review of factors influencing clinical management. Raza S; Goldkamp AL; Chikarmane SA; Birdwell RL Radiographics; 2010 Sep; 30(5):1199-213. PubMed ID: 20833845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Pictorial Review of Changes in the BI-RADS Fifth Edition. Rao AA; Feneis J; Lalonde C; Ojeda-Fournier H Radiographics; 2016; 36(3):623-39. PubMed ID: 27082663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. BI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 lesions: value of US in management--follow-up and outcome. Raza S; Chikarmane SA; Neilsen SS; Zorn LM; Birdwell RL Radiology; 2008 Sep; 248(3):773-81. PubMed ID: 18647850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value. Lazarus E; Mainiero MB; Schepps B; Koelliker SL; Livingston LS Radiology; 2006 May; 239(2):385-91. PubMed ID: 16569780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast imaging reporting and data system standardized mammography lexicon: observer variability in lesion description. Baker JA; Kornguth PJ; Floyd CE AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Apr; 166(4):773-8. PubMed ID: 8610547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Updates and revisions to the BI-RADS magnetic resonance imaging lexicon. Edwards SD; Lipson JA; Ikeda DM; Lee JM Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2013 Aug; 21(3):483-93. PubMed ID: 23928239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast imaging reporting and data system lexicon for US: interobserver agreement for assessment of breast masses. Abdullah N; Mesurolle B; El-Khoury M; Kao E Radiology; 2009 Sep; 252(3):665-72. PubMed ID: 19567644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Current Status and Future of BI-RADS in Multimodality Imaging, From the Eghtedari M; Chong A; Rakow-Penner R; Ojeda-Fournier H AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Apr; 216(4):860-873. PubMed ID: 33295802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. BI-RADS Spak DA; Plaxco JS; Santiago L; Dryden MJ; Dogan BE Diagn Interv Imaging; 2017 Mar; 98(3):179-190. PubMed ID: 28131457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Characterization of solid breast masses: use of the sonographic breast imaging reporting and data system lexicon. Costantini M; Belli P; Lombardi R; Franceschini G; Mulè A; Bonomo L J Ultrasound Med; 2006 May; 25(5):649-59; quiz 661. PubMed ID: 16632790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. S-Detect characterization of focal breast lesions according to the US BI RADS lexicon: a pictorial essay. Bartolotta TV; Orlando AAM; Spatafora L; Dimarco M; Gagliardo C; Taibbi A J Ultrasound; 2020 Jun; 23(2):207-215. PubMed ID: 32185702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Observer variability of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) for breast ultrasound. Lee HJ; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Youk JH; Lee JY; Kang DR; Oh KK Eur J Radiol; 2008 Feb; 65(2):293-8. PubMed ID: 17531417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. BI-RADS decoded: detailed guidance on potentially confusing issues. D'Orsi CJ; Newell MS Radiol Clin North Am; 2007 Sep; 45(5):751-63, v. PubMed ID: 17888766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Observer variability and applicability of BI-RADS terminology for breast MR imaging: invasive carcinomas as focal masses. Kim SJ; Morris EA; Liberman L; Ballon DJ; La Trenta LR; Hadar O; Abramson A; Dershaw DD AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Sep; 177(3):551-7. PubMed ID: 11517046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). Liberman L; Menell JH Radiol Clin North Am; 2002 May; 40(3):409-30, v. PubMed ID: 12117184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adjunctive targeted contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for the work-up of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 3 and 4 lesions. Zhang XL; Guan J; Li MZ; Liu MJ; Guo Y; Zheng YL; Yang Z; Yang JY J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2016 Aug; 60(4):485-91. PubMed ID: 27162117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Using the BI-RADS lexicon in a restrictive form of double reading as a strategy for minimizing screening mammography recall rates. Ghate SV; Baker JA; Kim CE; Johnson KS; Walsh R; Soo MS AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Apr; 198(4):962-70. PubMed ID: 22451567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories. Liberman L; Abramson AF; Squires FB; Glassman JR; Morris EA; Dershaw DD AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jul; 171(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 9648759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of age on PPV of sonographic BI-RADS categories 3, 4, and 5. Fu CY; Hsu HH; Yu JC; Hsu GC; Hsu KF; Chan DC; Ku CH; Lu TC; Chu CH Ultraschall Med; 2011 Jan; 32 Suppl 1():S8-13. PubMed ID: 20603785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classification in 51 excised palpable pediatric breast masses. Koning JL; Davenport KP; Poole PS; Kruk PG; Grabowski JE J Pediatr Surg; 2015 Oct; 50(10):1746-50. PubMed ID: 25783351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]