These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2083502)

  • 1. Children's use of anatomically detailed dolls to recount an event.
    Goodman GS; Aman C
    Child Dev; 1990 Dec; 61(6):1859-71. PubMed ID: 2083502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The accuracy of children's reports with anatomically correct dolls.
    Katz SM; Schonfeld DJ; Carter AS; Leventhal JM; Cicchetti DV
    J Dev Behav Pediatr; 1995 Apr; 16(2):71-6. PubMed ID: 7790517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of dolls to interview young children: issues of symbolic representation.
    DeLoache JS; Marzolf DP
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1995 Aug; 60(1):155-73. PubMed ID: 7545206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Anatomically-neutral dolls: their effects on the memory and suggestibility of 4- to 6-year-old eyewitnesses.
    Samra J; Yuille JC
    Child Abuse Negl; 1996 Dec; 20(12):1261-72. PubMed ID: 8985617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Developmental differences in the function and use of anatomical dolls during interviews with alleged sexual abuse victims.
    Thierry KL; Lamb ME; Orbach Y; Pipe ME
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 2005 Dec; 73(6):1125-34. PubMed ID: 16392985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interviewing young children about body touch and handling.
    Steward MS; Steward DS
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 1996; 61(4-5):1-214. PubMed ID: 8972588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sexualized doll play among young children: implications for the use of anatomical dolls in sexual abuse evaluations.
    Everson MD; Boat BW
    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 1990 Sep; 29(5):736-42. PubMed ID: 2228926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Specificity and sensitivity of sexually anatomically correct dolls in substantiating abuse: a pilot study.
    Realmuto GM; Jensen JB; Wescoe S
    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 1990 Sep; 29(5):743-6. PubMed ID: 2228927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of nonanatomical dolls in the sexual abuse interview.
    Britton HL; O'Keefe MA
    Child Abuse Negl; 1991; 15(4):567-73. PubMed ID: 1959088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Parameters of remembering and forgetting in the transition from infancy to early childhood.
    Bauer PJ; Wenner JA; Dropik PL; Wewerka SS
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2000; 65(4):i-vi, 1-204. PubMed ID: 12467092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Psychological science and the use of anatomically detailed dolls in child sexual-abuse assessments.
    Koocher GP; Goodman GS; White CS; Friedrich WN; Sivan AB; Reynolds CR
    Psychol Bull; 1995 Sep; 118(2):199-222. PubMed ID: 7568570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Developmental changes in event memory.
    Farrar MJ; Goodman GS
    Child Dev; 1992 Feb; 63(1):173-87. PubMed ID: 1551325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Anatomically correct dolls used in interviews of young children suspected of having been sexually abused.
    Leventhal JM; Hamilton J; Rekedal S; Tebano-Micci A; Eyster C
    Pediatrics; 1989 Nov; 84(5):900-6. PubMed ID: 2797984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Children's use of anatomically detailed dolls to report genital touching in a medical examination: developmental and gender comparisons.
    Bruck M; Ceci SJ; Francoeur E
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2000 Mar; 6(1):74-83. PubMed ID: 10937313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Children's suggestibility for an instance of a repeated event versus a unique event: the effect of degree of association between variable details.
    Connolly DA; Price HL
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2006 Mar; 93(3):207-23. PubMed ID: 16111696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assumptions and beliefs about the role of AD dolls in child sexual abuse validation interviews: are they supported empirically?
    Skinner LJ
    Behav Sci Law; 1996; 14(2):167-85. PubMed ID: 10160234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Young children's references to temporal attributes of allegedly experienced events in the course of forensic interviews.
    Orbach Y; Lamb ME
    Child Dev; 2007; 78(4):1100-20. PubMed ID: 17650128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does the nature of the experience influence suggestibility? A study of children's event memory.
    Gobbo C; Mega C; Pipe ME
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2002 Apr; 81(4):502-30. PubMed ID: 11890734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The response of young, non-sexually abused children to anatomically correct dolls.
    Glaser D; Collins C
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 1989 Jul; 30(4):547-60. PubMed ID: 2768357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceptions and predictors of children's credibility of a unique event and an instance of a repeated event.
    Connolly DA; Price HL; Lavoie JA; Gordon HM
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Feb; 32(1):92-112. PubMed ID: 17253152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.