These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20835401)

  • 1. Potential signal to accommodation from the Stiles-Crawford effect and ocular monochromatic aberrations.
    Stark LR; Kruger PB; Rucker FJ; Swanson WH; Schmidt N; Hardy C; Rutman H; Borgovan T; Burke S; Badar M; Shah R
    J Mod Opt; 2009 Nov; 56(20):2203-2216. PubMed ID: 20835401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Small foveal targets for studies of accommodation and the Stiles-Crawford effect.
    Kruger PB; Stark LR; Nguyen HN
    Vision Res; 2004 Nov; 44(24):2757-67. PubMed ID: 15342220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Human eyes do not need monochromatic aberrations for dynamic accommodation.
    Bernal-Molina P; Marín-Franch I; Del Águila-Carrasco AJ; Esteve-Taboada JJ; López-Gil N; Kruger PB; Montés-Micó R
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Sep; 37(5):602-609. PubMed ID: 28681436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dynamic accommodation without feedback does not respond to isolated blur cues.
    Esteve-Taboada JJ; Del Águila-Carrasco AJ; Bernal-Molina P; López-Gil N; Montés-Micó R; Kruger P; Marín-Franch I
    Vision Res; 2017 Jul; 136():50-56. PubMed ID: 28619515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Monochromatic aberrations provide an odd-error cue to focus direction.
    Wilson BJ; Decker KE; Roorda A
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2002 May; 19(5):833-9. PubMed ID: 11999959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Stiles-Crawford effect and subjective measurement of aberrations.
    Atchison DA; Scott DH
    Vision Res; 2002 Apr; 42(9):1089-102. PubMed ID: 11997048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accommodation and the Stiles-Crawford effect: theory and a case study.
    Kruger PB; López-Gil N; Stark LR
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2001 Sep; 21(5):339-51. PubMed ID: 11563420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accommodation-related changes in monochromatic aberrations of the human eye as a function of age.
    López-Gil N; Fernández-Sánchez V; Legras R; Montés-Micó R; Lara F; Nguyen-Khoa JL
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Apr; 49(4):1736-43. PubMed ID: 18385098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Monocular accommodation response to random defocus changes induced by a tuneable lens.
    Sharmin N; Vohnsen B
    Vision Res; 2019 Dec; 165():45-53. PubMed ID: 31634733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of just-noticeable differences for refractive errors and spherical aberration using visual simulation.
    Legras R; Chateau N; Charman WN
    Optom Vis Sci; 2004 Sep; 81(9):718-28. PubMed ID: 15365392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accommodation to static chromatic simulations of blurred retinal images.
    Lee JH; Stark LR; Cohen S; Kruger PB
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1999 May; 19(3):223-35. PubMed ID: 10627841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Subjective measurement of the Stiles-Crawford effect of the first kind with variation in accommodation.
    Nilagiri VK; Suheimat M; Lambert AJ; Atchison DA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2021 Sep; 41(5):1110-1118. PubMed ID: 34387885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of Stiles-Crawford effect apodization on spatial visual performance.
    Atchison DA; Joblin A; Smith G
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 1998 Sep; 15(9):2545-51. PubMed ID: 9729867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of Stiles-Crawford apodization on visual acuity.
    Atchison DA; Scott DH; Strang NC; Artal P
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2002 Jun; 19(6):1073-83. PubMed ID: 12049344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measurement of monochromatic ocular aberrations of human eyes as a function of accommodation by the Howland aberroscope technique.
    Atchison DA; Collins MJ; Wildsoet CF; Christensen J; Waterworth MD
    Vision Res; 1995 Feb; 35(3):313-23. PubMed ID: 7892727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accommodation Responds to Optical Vergence and Not Defocus Blur Alone.
    Del Águila-Carrasco AJ; Marín-Franch I; Bernal-Molina P; Esteve-Taboada JJ; Kruger PB; Montés-Micó R; López-Gil N
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2017 Mar; 58(3):1758-1763. PubMed ID: 28324117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Age-related changes in ocular aberrations with accommodation.
    Radhakrishnan H; Charman WN
    J Vis; 2007 May; 7(7):11.1-21. PubMed ID: 17685807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Apodization by the Stiles-Crawford effect moderates the visual impact of retinal image defocus.
    Zhang X; Ye M; Bradley A; Thibos L
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 1999 Apr; 16(4):812-20. PubMed ID: 10192960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of third-order aberrations on dynamic accommodation.
    López-Gil N; Rucker FJ; Stark LR; Badar M; Borgovan T; Burke S; Kruger PB
    Vision Res; 2007 Mar; 47(6):755-65. PubMed ID: 17280697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A method for simulation of foveal vision during wear of corrective lenses.
    Legras R; Chateau N; Charman WN
    Optom Vis Sci; 2004 Sep; 81(9):729-38. PubMed ID: 15365393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.