These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20835533)

  • 1. Speech recognition according to the length of hearing aid use.
    Petry T; Santos SN; Costa MJ
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2010; 76(4):462-8. PubMed ID: 20835533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Hearing aids: objective and subjective evaluations of linear and nonlinear amplification users].
    Costa LP; Iório MC
    Pro Fono; 2006; 18(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 16625868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dynamic relation between working memory capacity and speech recognition in noise during the first 6 months of hearing aid use.
    Ng EH; Classon E; Larsby B; Arlinger S; Lunner T; Rudner M; Rönnberg J
    Trends Hear; 2014 Nov; 18():. PubMed ID: 25421088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Study of benefit and of acclimatization in recent users of hearing aids].
    Amorim RM; Almeida Kd
    Pro Fono; 2007; 19(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 17461346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speech perception of hearing impaired people using a hearing aid with noise supression algorithms.
    Oliveira JR; Lopes ES; Alves AF
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2010; 76(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 20339683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acclimatization effect in speech recognition: evaluation without hearing aids.
    Santos SN; Petry T; Costa MJ
    Pro Fono; 2010; 22(4):543-8. PubMed ID: 21271114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sentence recognition in noise and perceived benefit of noise reduction on the receiver and transmitter sides of a BICROS hearing aid.
    Oeding K; Valente M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(10):980-91. PubMed ID: 24384083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech Perception in Noise and Listening Effort of Older Adults With Nonlinear Frequency Compression Hearing Aids.
    Shehorn J; Marrone N; Muller T
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):215-225. PubMed ID: 28806193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acclimatization to hearing aids.
    Dawes P; Munro KJ; Kalluri S; Edwards B
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):203-12. PubMed ID: 24351612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech recognition ability in noise and its relationship to perceived hearing aid benefit.
    Cord MT; Leek MR; Walden BE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2000 Oct; 11(9):475-83. PubMed ID: 11057731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of compression and hearing aid style on directional hearing aid benefit and performance.
    Ricketts T; Lindley G; Henry P
    Ear Hear; 2001 Aug; 22(4):348-61. PubMed ID: 11527041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of compression release time of a hearing aid on sentence recognition and the quality judgment of speech.
    Shetty HN; Raju S
    Noise Health; 2019; 21(103):232-241. PubMed ID: 32978360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acoustic stimulation effect on temporal processing skills in elderly subjects before and after hearing aid fitting.
    Pinheiro MM; Dias KZ; Pereira LD
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2012; 78(4):9-16. PubMed ID: 22936130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differences in Word and Phoneme Recognition in Quiet, Sentence Recognition in Noise, and Subjective Outcomes between Manufacturer First-Fit and Hearing Aids Programmed to NAL-NL2 Using Real-Ear Measures.
    Valente M; Oeding K; Brockmeyer A; Smith S; Kallogjeri D
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Sep; 29(8):706-721. PubMed ID: 30222541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of nonlinear frequency compression on Mandarin speech and sound-quality perception in hearing-aid users.
    Chen X; You Y; Yang J; Qian J; Lu Q; Kuehnel V; Rehmann J; Liu B; Xu L
    Int J Audiol; 2020 Jul; 59(7):524-533. PubMed ID: 32441563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Field trials using a digital hearing aid with active noise reduction and dual-microphone directionality.
    Boymans M; Dreschler WA
    Audiology; 2000; 39(5):260-8. PubMed ID: 11093610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech recognition performance of patients with sensorineural hearing loss under unaided and aided conditions using linear and compression hearing AIDS.
    Shanks JE; Wilson RH; Larson V; Williams D
    Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):280-90. PubMed ID: 12195170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of threshold-based fitting strategies for nonlinear hearing aids.
    Stelmachowicz PG; Dalzell S; Peterson D; Kopun J; Lewis DL; Hoover BE
    Ear Hear; 1998 Apr; 19(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 9562535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using Speech Recall in Hearing Aid Fitting and Outcome Evaluation Under Ecological Test Conditions.
    Lunner T; Rudner M; Rosenbom T; Ågren J; Ng EH
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37 Suppl 1():145S-54S. PubMed ID: 27355764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Longitudinal outcomes of cochlear implantation and bimodal hearing in a large group of adults: A multicenter clinical study.
    Kelsall D; Lupo J; Biever A
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2021; 42(1):102773. PubMed ID: 33161258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.