634 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20836004)
1. Cytological differential diagnosis among adenocarcinoma, epithelial mesothelioma, and reactive mesothelial cells in serous effusions by immunocytochemistry.
Su XY; Li GD; Liu WP; Xie B; Jiang YH
Diagn Cytopathol; 2011 Dec; 39(12):900-8. PubMed ID: 20836004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Immunocytochemical panel for distinguishing between carcinoma and reactive mesothelial cells in body cavity fluids.
Politi E; Kandaraki C; Apostolopoulou C; Kyritsi T; Koutselini H
Diagn Cytopathol; 2005 Mar; 32(3):151-5. PubMed ID: 15690338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Immunocytochemistry in the differential diagnosis of serous effusions: a comparative evaluation of eight monoclonal antibodies in Papanicolaou stained smears.
Lozano MD; Panizo A; Toledo GR; Sola JJ; Pardo-Mindán J
Cancer; 2001 Feb; 93(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 11241268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Significance of combining detection of E-cadherin, carcinoembryonic antigen, and calretinin in cytological differential diagnosis of serous effusion].
Su XY; Li GD; Liu HB; Jiang LL
Ai Zheng; 2004 Oct; 23(10):1185-9. PubMed ID: 15473932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Malignant mesothelioma: immunohistochemistry and DNA ploidy analysis as methods to differentiate mesothelioma from benign reactive mesothelial cell proliferation and adenocarcinoma in pleural and peritoneal effusions.
Friedman MT; Gentile P; Tarectecan A; Fuchs A
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Oct; 120(10):959-66. PubMed ID: 12046609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of three cytologic preparation methods and immunocytochemistries to distinguish adenocarcinoma cells from reactive mesothelial cells in serous effusion.
Ueda J; Iwata T; Ono M; Takahashi M
Diagn Cytopathol; 2006 Jan; 34(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 16355377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The diagnostic utility of D2-40, calretinin, CK5/6, desmin and MOC-31 in the differentiation of mesothelioma from adenocarcinoma in pleural effusion cytology.
Hyun TS; Barnes M; Tabatabai ZL
Acta Cytol; 2012; 56(5):527-32. PubMed ID: 23075894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differentiation of mesothelioma from adenocarcinoma in serous effusions: the role of hyaluronic acid and CD44 localization.
Afify AM; Stern R; Michael CW
Diagn Cytopathol; 2005 Mar; 32(3):145-50. PubMed ID: 15690337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differentiating reactive mesothelial cells from metastatic adenocarcinoma in serous effusions: the utility of immunocytochemical panel in the differential diagnosis.
Saleh HA; El-Fakharany M; Makki H; Kadhim A; Masood S
Diagn Cytopathol; 2009 May; 37(5):324-32. PubMed ID: 19191294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Calretinin, thrombomodulin, CEA, and CD15: a useful combination of immunohistochemical markers for differentiating pleural epithelial mesothelioma from peripheral pulmonary adenocarcinoma.
Comin CE; Novelli L; Boddi V; Paglierani M; Dini S
Hum Pathol; 2001 May; 32(5):529-36. PubMed ID: 11381372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of a panel of markers in the differential diagnosis of adenocarcinoma and reactive mesothelial cells in fluid cytology.
Ko EC; Jhala NC; Shultz JJ; Chhieng DC
Am J Clin Pathol; 2001 Nov; 116(5):709-15. PubMed ID: 11710688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [A comparative evaluation of immunohistochemical markers for the differential diagnosis between malignant mesothelioma, non-small cell carcinoma involving the pleura, and benign reactive mesothelial cell proliferation].
Szczepulska-Wójcik E; Langfort R; Roszkowski-Sliz K
Pneumonol Alergol Pol; 2007; 75(1):57-69. PubMed ID: 17541913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Podoplanin is a useful marker for identifying mesothelioma in malignant effusions.
Hanna A; Pang Y; Bedrossian CW; Dejmek A; Michael CW
Diagn Cytopathol; 2010 Apr; 38(4):264-9. PubMed ID: 20146302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. D2-40 is not a specific marker for cells of mesothelial origin in serous effusions.
Bassarova AV; Nesland JM; Davidson B
Am J Surg Pathol; 2006 Jul; 30(7):878-82. PubMed ID: 16819331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic Accuracy of a Limited Immuno-panel of Calretinin and Ber-EP4 for Diagnosis of Malignant Effusions.
Khurram N; Anis T; Yusuf NW
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2019 Jan; 29(1):33-36. PubMed ID: 30630566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The combination of CEA, EMA, and BerEp4 and hyaluronan analysis specifically identifies 79% of all histologically verified mesotheliomas causing an effusion.
Dejmek A; Hjerpe A
Diagn Cytopathol; 2005 Mar; 32(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 15690331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The value of calretinin and cytokeratin 5/6 as markers for mesothelioma in cell block preparations of serous effusions.
Shield PW; Koivurinne K
Cytopathology; 2008 Aug; 19(4):218-23. PubMed ID: 17916095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Immunocytochemistry of malignant mesothelioma: OV632 as a marker of malignant mesothelioma.
Delahaye M; Hoogsteden HC; Van der Kwast TH
J Pathol; 1991 Oct; 165(2):137-43. PubMed ID: 1744800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Differential diagnostic value of B72.3, Ber-EP4 and calretinin in serous effusions].
Li XJ; Pan QJ; Shen GH; Liu XY; Sun YT
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2005 Jul; 27(7):438-41. PubMed ID: 16188134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The value of ThinPrep and cytospin preparation in pleural effusion cytological diagnosis of mesothelioma and adenocarcinoma.
Ylagan LR; Zhai J
Diagn Cytopathol; 2005 Mar; 32(3):137-44. PubMed ID: 15690333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
