110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20836030)
1. Modeling breast biomechanics for multi-modal image analysis--successes and challenges.
Rajagopal V; Nielsen PMF; Nash MP
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med; 2010; 2(3):293-304. PubMed ID: 20836030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast lesion co-localisation between X-ray and MR images using finite element modelling.
Lee AW; Rajagopal V; Babarenda Gamage TP; Doyle AJ; Nielsen PM; Nash MP
Med Image Anal; 2013 Dec; 17(8):1256-64. PubMed ID: 23860392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A review of biomechanically informed breast image registration.
Hipwell JH; Vavourakis V; Han L; Mertzanidou T; Eiben B; Hawkes DJ
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Jan; 61(2):R1-31. PubMed ID: 26733349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automatic multimodal 2D/3D breast image registration using biomechanical FEM models and intensity-based optimization.
Hopp T; Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Kreisel P; Kaiser WA; Gemmeke H; Ruiter NV
Med Image Anal; 2013 Feb; 17(2):209-18. PubMed ID: 23265802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A complete software application for automatic registration of x-ray mammography and magnetic resonance images.
Solves-Llorens JA; Rupérez MJ; Monserrat C; Feliu E; García M; Lloret M
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081903. PubMed ID: 25086534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Breast image registration and deformation modeling.
Boehler T; Zoehrer F; Harz M; Hahn HK
Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 2012; 40(3):235-58. PubMed ID: 22694202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A biomechanical breast model evaluated with respect to MRI data collected in three different positions.
Mîra A; Carton AK; Muller S; Payan Y
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2018 Dec; 60():191-199. PubMed ID: 30408760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Co-registration of MR-mammography and X-ray mammography.
Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Hopp T; Ruiter NV; Kaiser WA
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S27-9. PubMed ID: 23083591
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Imaging anisotropic and viscous properties of breast tissue by magnetic resonance-elastography.
Sinkus R; Tanter M; Catheline S; Lorenzen J; Kuhl C; Sondermann E; Fink M
Magn Reson Med; 2005 Feb; 53(2):372-87. PubMed ID: 15678538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of nonrigid image registration using finite-element methods: application to breast MR images.
Schnabel JA; Tanner C; Castellano-Smith AD; Degenhard A; Leach MO; Hose DR; Hill DL; Hawkes DJ
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Feb; 22(2):238-47. PubMed ID: 12716000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analytic modeling of breast elastography.
Liu HT; Sun LZ; Wang G; Vannier MW
Med Phys; 2003 Sep; 30(9):2340-9. PubMed ID: 14528956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Frictional contact mechanics methods for soft materials: application to tracking breast cancers.
Chung JH; Rajagopal V; Laursen TA; Nielsen PM; Nash MP
J Biomech; 2008; 41(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 17727862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MRI to X-ray mammography registration using a volume-preserving affine transformation.
Mertzanidou T; Hipwell J; Cardoso MJ; Zhang X; Tanner C; Ourselin S; Bick U; Huisman H; Karssemeijer N; Hawkes D
Med Image Anal; 2012 Jul; 16(5):966-75. PubMed ID: 22513136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative evaluation of free-form deformation registration for dynamic contrast-enhanced MR mammography.
Tanner C; Schnabel JA; Hill DL; Hawkes DJ; Degenhard A; Leach MO; Hose DR; Hall-Craggs MA; Usiskin SI
Med Phys; 2007 Apr; 34(4):1221-33. PubMed ID: 17500454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Recent technological advancements in breast ultrasound.
Eisenbrey JR; Dave JK; Forsberg F
Ultrasonics; 2016 Aug; 70():183-90. PubMed ID: 27179143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A novel breast software phantom for biomechanical modeling of elastography.
Bhatti SN; Sridhar-Keralapura M
Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):1748-68. PubMed ID: 22482599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reproducibility of the assessment of tumor extent in the breast using multiple image modalities.
Zeggelink WF; Deurloo EE; Bartelink H; Rutgers EJ; Gilhuijs KG
Med Phys; 2003 Nov; 30(11):2919-26. PubMed ID: 14655939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An inverse problem solution for measuring the elastic modulus of intact ex vivo breast tissue tumours.
Samani A; Plewes D
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1247-60. PubMed ID: 17301452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast image analysis for risk assessment, detection, diagnosis, and treatment of cancer.
Giger ML; Karssemeijer N; Schnabel JA
Annu Rev Biomed Eng; 2013; 15():327-57. PubMed ID: 23683087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Correlation between mammographic density and volumetric fibroglandular tissue estimated on breast MR images.
Wei J; Chan HP; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Zhou C; Paquerault S; Chenevert T; Goodsitt MM
Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):933-42. PubMed ID: 15125012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
