These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20836030)

  • 21. Breast MR imaging: current indications and advanced imaging techniques.
    Weinstein S; Rosen M
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2010 Sep; 48(5):1013-42. PubMed ID: 20868898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Breast MR for intraductal masses.
    Harms SE; Harms DE; Pope K; Grear D; Smith-Foley S; Johnson K
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S59-60. PubMed ID: 23083603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Factors influencing the accuracy of biomechanical breast models.
    Tanner C; Schnabel JA; Hill DL; Hawkes DJ; Leach MO; Hose DR
    Med Phys; 2006 Jun; 33(6):1758-69. PubMed ID: 16872083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Breast image registration techniques: a survey.
    Guo Y; Sivaramakrishna R; Lu CC; Suri JS; Laxminarayan S
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2006 Mar; 44(1-2):15-26. PubMed ID: 16929917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Ultrasound and the biomechanical competence of bone.
    Nicholson PF
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008 Jul; 55(7):1539-45. PubMed ID: 18986944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [New trends and novel possibilities in the diagnostic imaging of breast cancer].
    Bidlek M; Kovács E; Fehér K; Gõdény M
    Magy Onkol; 2015 Mar; 59(1):44-55. PubMed ID: 25763913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Elastic registration of prostate MR images based on estimation of deformation states.
    Marami B; Sirouspour S; Ghoul S; Cepek J; Davidson SR; Capson DW; Trachtenberg J; Fenster A
    Med Image Anal; 2015 Apr; 21(1):87-103. PubMed ID: 25624044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Analytical optimization of digital subtraction mammography with contrast medium using a commercial unit.
    Rosado-Méndez I; Palma BA; Brandan ME
    Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5544-57. PubMed ID: 19175112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dynamic thermal modeling of the normal and tumorous breast under elastic deformation.
    Jiang L; Zhan W; Loew MH
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2008; 11(Pt 2):798-805. PubMed ID: 18982678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Modality independent elastography (MIE): a new approach to elasticity imaging.
    Washington CW; Miga MI
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Sep; 23(9):1117-28. PubMed ID: 15377121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Digital mammography: clinical image evaluation.
    Bassett LW; Hoyt AC; Oshiro T
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2010 Sep; 48(5):903-15. PubMed ID: 20868893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Towards a more realistic biomechanical modelling of breast malignant tumours.
    Wessel C; Schnabel JA; Brady M
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Feb; 57(3):631-48. PubMed ID: 22241544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Noninvasive high resolution mechanical strain maps of the spine intervertebral disc using nonrigid registration of magnetic resonance images.
    Reiter DA; Fathallah FA; Farouki RT; Walton JH
    J Biomech; 2012 May; 45(8):1534-9. PubMed ID: 22503578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Automatic detection of abnormal breast thermograms using asymmetry analysis of texture features.
    Francis SV; Sasikala M
    J Med Eng Technol; 2013 Jan; 37(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 23194447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Simulation study of a quasi-monochromatic beam for x-ray computed mammotomography.
    McKinley RL; Tornai MP; Samei E; Bradshaw ML
    Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):800-13. PubMed ID: 15124997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparison of two methods for the segmentation of masses in the digital mammograms.
    Dubey RB; Hanmandlu M; Gupta SK
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2010 Apr; 34(3):185-91. PubMed ID: 19828291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Quantification of acoustic radiation force impulse in differentiating between malignant and benign breast lesions.
    Li Z; Sun J; Zhang J; Hu D; Wang Q; Peng K
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Feb; 40(2):287-92. PubMed ID: 24315390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound.
    Vassiou K; Kanavou T; Vlychou M; Poultsidi A; Athanasiou E; Arvanitis DL; Fezoulidis IV
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 18295425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Manifold-based feature point matching for multi-modal image registration.
    Hu L; Wang M; Song Z
    Int J Med Robot; 2013 Mar; 9(1):e10-8. PubMed ID: 23175165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Use of BI-RADS to interpret magnetic resonance mammography for breast cancer].
    Kharuzhyk SA; Shimanets SV; Karman AV; Shapoval EV
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2014; (4):46-59. PubMed ID: 25775888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.