These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20837575)

  • 1. Assessing equity in systematic reviews: realising the recommendations of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health.
    Tugwell P; Petticrew M; Kristjansson E; Welch V; Ueffing E; Waters E; Bonnefoy J; Morgan A; Doohan E; Kelly MP
    BMJ; 2010 Sep; 341():c4739. PubMed ID: 20837575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prevention and self-management interventions are top priorities for osteoarthritis systematic reviews.
    Jaramillo A; Welch VA; Ueffing E; Gruen RL; Bragge P; Lyddiatt A; Tugwell P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 May; 66(5):503-510.e4. PubMed ID: 22995854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations.
    Manchikanti L
    Pain Physician; 2008; 11(2):161-86. PubMed ID: 18354710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Killing inequity: final report of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health].
    Holcík J
    Cas Lek Cesk; 2009; 148(1):4-9. PubMed ID: 19634276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence-based dental care--a concept review.
    Nainar SM
    Pediatr Dent; 1998; 20(7):418-21. PubMed ID: 9866146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tips for learners of evidence-based medicine: 4. Assessing heterogeneity of primary studies in systematic reviews and whether to combine their results.
    Hatala R; Keitz S; Wyer P; Guyatt G;
    CMAJ; 2005 Mar; 172(5):661-5. PubMed ID: 15738493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. AHRQ series paper 4: assessing harms when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the effective health-care program.
    Chou R; Aronson N; Atkins D; Ismaila AS; Santaguida P; Smith DH; Whitlock E; Wilt TJ; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 May; 63(5):502-12. PubMed ID: 18823754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing applicability when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program.
    Atkins D; Chang SM; Gartlehner G; Buckley DI; Whitlock EP; Berliner E; Matchar D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Nov; 64(11):1198-207. PubMed ID: 21463926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Finding evidence for comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program.
    Relevo R; Balshem H
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Nov; 64(11):1168-77. PubMed ID: 21684115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Systematic reviews for evidence-based management: how to find them and what to do with them.
    Chan KS; Morton SC; Shekelle PG
    Am J Manag Care; 2004 Nov; 10(11 Pt 1):806-12. PubMed ID: 15623270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Conducting quantitative synthesis when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program.
    Fu R; Gartlehner G; Grant M; Shamliyan T; Sedrakyan A; Wilt TJ; Griffith L; Oremus M; Raina P; Ismaila A; Santaguida P; Lau J; Trikalinos TA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Nov; 64(11):1187-97. PubMed ID: 21477993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. AHRQ series commentary 1: rating the evidence in comparative effectiveness reviews.
    Falck-Ytter Y; Schünemann H; Guyatt G
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 May; 63(5):474-5. PubMed ID: 20189352
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. AHRQ series paper 5: grading the strength of a body of evidence when comparing medical interventions--agency for healthcare research and quality and the effective health-care program.
    Owens DK; Lohr KN; Atkins D; Treadwell JR; Reston JT; Bass EB; Chang S; Helfand M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 May; 63(5):513-23. PubMed ID: 19595577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Desired attributes of evidence assessments for evidence-based practices.
    Leff HS; Conley JA
    Adm Policy Ment Health; 2006 Nov; 33(6):648-58. PubMed ID: 16804745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Why certain systematic reviews reach uncertain conclusions.
    Petticrew M
    BMJ; 2003 Apr; 326(7392):756-8. PubMed ID: 12676848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Best practice for prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease through an equity lens: a review.
    Beauchamp A; Peeters A; Tonkin A; Turrell G
    Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil; 2010 Oct; 17(5):599-606. PubMed ID: 20562629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Promoting health equity in conflict-affected fragile states.
    Bornemisza O; Ranson MK; Poletti TM; Sondorp E
    Soc Sci Med; 2010 Jan; 70(1):80-8. PubMed ID: 19853342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.